BharatTax.net
← All Phrases

“Section 9(1)(5)(c)”

Section References (mined)Section 9Section 9(1)(5)(c)2 judgments

BNP PARIBAS,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (IT), CIRCLE 1(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4449/MUM/2023[AY 2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satyapal Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 148Section 2

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “I”, MUMBAI Before Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Accountant Member & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

BNP PARIBAS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONA TAXATION)-CIRCLE 1(3)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 3416/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, M/S Bnp Paribas 1 North Avenue, Maker Maxity, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai – 400051

For Appellant: Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Ajay Kumar Sharma
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 270A

Page 1 ITA No.3416/Mum/2023 M/s BNP Paribas Vs. ACIT (IT) Circle 1(3)(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Section 9(1)(5)(c) — 2 judgments | BharatTax | BharatTax