← All Phrases

“income from other sources”

Income HeadsSection 56Section 568,248 judgments

The decision most relied on for income from other sources is Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT (187 ITR 688), cited in 1,372 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on income from other sources

Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT
187 ITR 688 · 1991 · Supreme Court
1,372
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) possesses co-terminus powers with the Assessing Officer and can direct the Assessing Officer to perform actions he failed to do, but cannot introduce a new source of income in the assessment. The appellate assessment must be confined to the items of income that were the subject matter of the original assessment.

Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO
322 ITR 283 · 2010 · Supreme Court
1,283
citing judgments

The interest income earned by a cooperative society from investing its surplus funds in fixed deposits with banks is not "derived from" its eligible business activities and is taxable as "income from other sources" under Section 56, thus not qualifying for deduction under Section 80P.

K.P. Varghese v. ITO
131 ITR 597 · 1981 · Supreme Court
989
citing judgments

An addition to income cannot be made merely on the basis of a difference in valuation of assets or a Valuation Officer's report without establishing actual understatement of consideration or the source of unexplained funds through proper enquiry. The Assessing Officer must conduct proper enquiry and satisfy the conditions for making such additions.

GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
327 ITR 456 · 2010 · Supreme Court
663
citing judgments

Tax must be deducted at source from payments made to a non-resident under Section 195 only if such payment is chargeable to tax in India. The Assessing Officer bears the onus to establish that the payments made are indeed chargeable to tax under the Income Tax Act.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd.
342 ITR 169 · 2012 · High Court
658
citing judgments

To make an addition under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits, the Assessing Officer must conduct proper inquiry into the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the creditor, especially concerning share application money. The assessee's initial discharge of burden by providing necessary details shifts the onus back to the AO for further investigation, including the source of source.

Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT
227 ITR 172 · 1997 · Supreme Court
621
citing judgments

Interest income earned on deposits, particularly before the commencement of business operations or as a requirement for business licensing, is taxable as "income from other sources" under Section 56, and cannot be treated as business income or set off against interest on borrowed funds.

Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif v. CIT
50 ITR 1 · 1963 · Supreme Court
581
citing judgments

The assessee bears the onus of proving the source and nature of any sum of money or receipt found to have been received by them. If the assessee fails to satisfactorily explain the receipt, the Income-tax Officer is entitled to treat it as taxable income.

Liberty India v. CIT
317 ITR 218 · 2009 · Supreme Court
571
citing judgments

The Supreme Court clarified that for profits and gains to be eligible for deductions under sections like 10B, 80IA, or 80IB, the income must be "derived from" or have a direct nexus to the eligible business activity. Income from incidental sources like the sale of scrips/licenses or interest on employee loans is generally not considered as derived from the eligible business for such deductions.

Judgments citing income from other sources

Salahuddin Mohammed, Secunderabad vs. ITO., Ward-11(1), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1047/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1047/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Shri Salahuddin Mohd. Vs. Income Tax Officer Secunderabad Ward 11(1) Pan: Adgpm5833N Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ca Hemalatha K राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 07/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/10/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By Shri Salahuddin Mohammed, (“The Assessee”), Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) (“Ld.Cit(A)”) Dated 10.08.2024 For The A.Y 2013-14. 2. At The Outset, It Is Seen That There Is A Delay Of 231 Days In Filing The Present Appeal Before The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With An Affidavit

For Appellant: CA Hemalatha KFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

erred in concluding INR 1,08,97,655 /- as Unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act and adding the same under the head ‘Income from other Sources’. Page 3 of 6 ITA No 1047 of 2025 Salahuddin Mohammed Secunderabad 5. On the facts and circumstances of the case, interest levied

M/S Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Ltd., Ranchi vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 221/RAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.200/Ran/2018 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Vs. M/S Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Ltd. H/O Bms Electricals, Near Hinoo Bridge, Hinoo, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 1402 H & Cross Objection.04/Ran/2019 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) (Arising Out Of Ita No.200/Ran/2018) M/S Jharkhand State Forest Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Development Corporation Ltd. H/O Bms Electricals, Near Hinoo Bridge, Hinoo, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 1402 H & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.221/Ran/2018 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Jharkhand State Forest Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Development Corporation Ltd. H/O Bms Electricals, Near Hinoo Bridge, Hinoo, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 1402 H (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri J.P.Sharma, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench :

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 56

Order As per assessment order u/s 143(3): The interest income transferred directly to Building Construction Fund should have been recognized as "income from other sources" u/s 56. As per assessment order u/s 250: Interest earned from parking the funds as being assessable to tax as a revenue receipt. Where ... prove that such receipt is exempt from taxation. Therefore, in view of the above discussions, it is held that the 'interest income' is 'income from Other Sources and is therefore added back to the total income of the assessee and is added back as income. Ground of appeal: Earmarked amount

DCIT, Circle-1, Ranchi vs. M/S Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Ltd., Ranchi

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 200/RAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.200/Ran/2018 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Vs. M/S Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Ltd. H/O Bms Electricals, Near Hinoo Bridge, Hinoo, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 1402 H & Cross Objection.04/Ran/2019 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) (Arising Out Of Ita No.200/Ran/2018) M/S Jharkhand State Forest Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Development Corporation Ltd. H/O Bms Electricals, Near Hinoo Bridge, Hinoo, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 1402 H & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.221/Ran/2018 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Jharkhand State Forest Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Development Corporation Ltd. H/O Bms Electricals, Near Hinoo Bridge, Hinoo, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 1402 H (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri J.P.Sharma, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench :

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 56

Order As per assessment order u/s 143(3): The interest income transferred directly to Building Construction Fund should have been recognized as "income from other sources" u/s 56. As per assessment order u/s 250: Interest earned from parking the funds as being assessable to tax as a revenue receipt. Where ... prove that such receipt is exempt from taxation. Therefore, in view of the above discussions, it is held that the 'interest income' is 'income from Other Sources and is therefore added back to the total income of the assessee and is added back as income. Ground of appeal: Earmarked amount

Smt Menon Ujjana Ekka vs. DCIT Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the three assesses are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 344/RAN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.322 To 325/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2007-2008 To 2010-2011) M/S Ekka Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabce 6018 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.337 To 341/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2010-2011) Sri Anosh Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7538 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.342 To 344/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2008-2009) Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7539 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Twelve Appeals Are Filed By The Three Different Assessees Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Ranchi, Both Dated 01.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 151

unexplained investment and unexplained income of Shri Anosh Ekka. The business income of Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka has been treated as the income from other sources of Shri Anosh Ekka. The unexplained expenditure allegedly of both Anosh Ekka and Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka was treated as the income from other ... form of share capital and secured loans in the case of M/s Ekka Construction has been treated as unexplained investment and income from other sources as also investments in the case of Shri Anosh Ekka on substantive basis. A perusal of the assessment order shows that in respect of share

Smt Menon Ujjana Ekka vs. DCIT Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the three assesses are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 343/RAN/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.322 To 325/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2007-2008 To 2010-2011) M/S Ekka Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabce 6018 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.337 To 341/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2010-2011) Sri Anosh Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7538 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.342 To 344/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2008-2009) Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7539 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Twelve Appeals Are Filed By The Three Different Assessees Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Ranchi, Both Dated 01.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 151

unexplained investment and unexplained income of Shri Anosh Ekka. The business income of Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka has been treated as the income from other sources of Shri Anosh Ekka. The unexplained expenditure allegedly of both Anosh Ekka and Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka was treated as the income from other ... form of share capital and secured loans in the case of M/s Ekka Construction has been treated as unexplained investment and income from other sources as also investments in the case of Shri Anosh Ekka on substantive basis. A perusal of the assessment order shows that in respect of share

Smt Menon Ujjana Ekka vs. DCIT Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the three assesses are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 342/RAN/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.322 To 325/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2007-2008 To 2010-2011) M/S Ekka Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabce 6018 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.337 To 341/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2010-2011) Sri Anosh Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7538 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.342 To 344/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2008-2009) Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7539 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Twelve Appeals Are Filed By The Three Different Assessees Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Ranchi, Both Dated 01.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 151

unexplained investment and unexplained income of Shri Anosh Ekka. The business income of Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka has been treated as the income from other sources of Shri Anosh Ekka. The unexplained expenditure allegedly of both Anosh Ekka and Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka was treated as the income from other ... form of share capital and secured loans in the case of M/s Ekka Construction has been treated as unexplained investment and income from other sources as also investments in the case of Shri Anosh Ekka on substantive basis. A perusal of the assessment order shows that in respect of share

Shri Anosh Ekka vs. DCIT Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the three assesses are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 341/RAN/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.322 To 325/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2007-2008 To 2010-2011) M/S Ekka Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabce 6018 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.337 To 341/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2010-2011) Sri Anosh Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7538 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.342 To 344/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2008-2009) Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7539 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Twelve Appeals Are Filed By The Three Different Assessees Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Ranchi, Both Dated 01.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 151

unexplained investment and unexplained income of Shri Anosh Ekka. The business income of Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka has been treated as the income from other sources of Shri Anosh Ekka. The unexplained expenditure allegedly of both Anosh Ekka and Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka was treated as the income from other ... form of share capital and secured loans in the case of M/s Ekka Construction has been treated as unexplained investment and income from other sources as also investments in the case of Shri Anosh Ekka on substantive basis. A perusal of the assessment order shows that in respect of share

Shri Anosh Ekka vs. ACIT, Cir-1, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the three assesses are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 340/RAN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.322 To 325/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2007-2008 To 2010-2011) M/S Ekka Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabce 6018 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.337 To 341/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2010-2011) Sri Anosh Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7538 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.342 To 344/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2008-2009) Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7539 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Twelve Appeals Are Filed By The Three Different Assessees Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Ranchi, Both Dated 01.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 151

unexplained investment and unexplained income of Shri Anosh Ekka. The business income of Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka has been treated as the income from other sources of Shri Anosh Ekka. The unexplained expenditure allegedly of both Anosh Ekka and Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka was treated as the income from other ... form of share capital and secured loans in the case of M/s Ekka Construction has been treated as unexplained investment and income from other sources as also investments in the case of Shri Anosh Ekka on substantive basis. A perusal of the assessment order shows that in respect of share

Shri Anosh Ekka vs. DCIT Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the three assesses are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 339/RAN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.322 To 325/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2007-2008 To 2010-2011) M/S Ekka Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabce 6018 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.337 To 341/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2010-2011) Sri Anosh Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7538 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.342 To 344/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2008-2009) Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7539 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Twelve Appeals Are Filed By The Three Different Assessees Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Ranchi, Both Dated 01.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 151

unexplained investment and unexplained income of Shri Anosh Ekka. The business income of Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka has been treated as the income from other sources of Shri Anosh Ekka. The unexplained expenditure allegedly of both Anosh Ekka and Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka was treated as the income from other ... form of share capital and secured loans in the case of M/s Ekka Construction has been treated as unexplained investment and income from other sources as also investments in the case of Shri Anosh Ekka on substantive basis. A perusal of the assessment order shows that in respect of share

Shri Anosh Ekka vs. DCIT Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the three assesses are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 338/RAN/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.322 To 325/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2007-2008 To 2010-2011) M/S Ekka Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabce 6018 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.337 To 341/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2010-2011) Sri Anosh Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7538 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.342 To 344/Ran/2016 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2006-2007 To 2008-2009) Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Kajribar, Patartanr, Simdega, Jharkhand-835223 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aagpe 7539 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Twelve Appeals Are Filed By The Three Different Assessees Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Ranchi, Both Dated 01.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 151

unexplained investment and unexplained income of Shri Anosh Ekka. The business income of Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka has been treated as the income from other sources of Shri Anosh Ekka. The unexplained expenditure allegedly of both Anosh Ekka and Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka was treated as the income from other ... form of share capital and secured loans in the case of M/s Ekka Construction has been treated as unexplained investment and income from other sources as also investments in the case of Shri Anosh Ekka on substantive basis. A perusal of the assessment order shows that in respect of share