← All Phrases

“Section 134(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 134Section 134(1)2 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 134(1) is Woolcombers of India Ltd. v. CIT (134 ITR 219), cited in 129 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 134(1)

Woolcombers of India Ltd. v. CIT
134 ITR 219 · 1982 · High Court
129
citing judgments

Where an assessee's own funds or interest-free funds exceed the interest-free advances or investments made, no disallowance of interest expenditure can be made, including under Section 14A.

Prakash Chand Nahata v. CIT
301 ITR 134 · 2008 · High Court
103
citing judgments

No addition to income can be made based solely on documents found from a third party without examining that third party and establishing a clear link between the documents' contents and the assessee.

Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT
112 Taxmann.com 134 · 2019 · Supreme Court
66
citing judgments

The Supreme Court considered the delay in filing an appeal and the appellant's justification for it. The court noted that the appellant's registered address was used for communication and that the postal authorities returned mail. The court referenced its earlier decision in 'Meda Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy Vs ACIT' when considering the appellant's case.

Radha Devi Dalmia v. CIT
125 ITR 134 · 1980 · High Court
55
citing judgments

When determining income from house property under Section 23, the Annual Letable Value (ALV) can be estimated by deeming 7% of the property's value as notional rent, particularly when actual rent or other clear basis for ALV is absent.

Sri Matha Vividoddesha Pathina Souharda Sahakari Niyamitha v. UOI
134 Taxmann.com 62 · 2022 · High Court
42
citing judgments

A society registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, qualifies as a co-operative society under Section 2(19) and is eligible for deductions under Section 80P.

Omega Sports & Radio Works v. CIT
134 ITR 28 · 1982 · High Court
26
citing judgments

An issue already concluded by the jurisdictional High Court is not debatable and cannot be rectified under section 154.

Chander Mohan Lall v. ACIT
134 Taxmann.com 292 · 2022 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Payments made by a resident Indian to foreign attorneys for services rendered outside India are not taxable in India as fees for technical services (FTS) if the income of the foreign attorneys is outside India.

CIT v. Rajasthan Financial Corporation
134 CTR 145 · 1996 · High Court
19
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer's decision allowing a claim based on the assessee's detailed written explanation and inquiries made during assessment cannot be deemed erroneous simply because the order lacks elaborate discussion on the matter.

Judgments citing Section 134(1)