← All Phrases

“direct tax vivad se vishwas”

Settlement & AmnestyDTVSV 2020DTVSV 20202,154 judgments

Judgments citing direct tax vivad se vishwas

Prem Prakash Sikka, Tiruppur vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Tiruppur

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2764/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2764/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-2019) Prem Prakash Sikka, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of No.15A, 3Rd Street, Kpn Colony, Income Tax, Tiruppur 641 601. Circle -1, Tiruppur. [Pan: Akyps 0946F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri N.V. Narayanan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. V. Aswathy, Irs, Jcit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manu Kumar Giri ()

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Narayanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. V. Aswathy, IRS, JCIT

Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. At the outset, it is noted that the assessee has opted for solution of dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024. Assessee also submitted Form 1 DTVSV dated 22.11.2024 as under: A.Y. 2018-19 vide e-Filing Acknowledgement Number ... Accordingly, noting the fact that the assessee is opted for resolution of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024 and form No.2 has been issued on 03.12.2024 in this appeal, we treat this appeal being disposed of as withdrawn. 4. The assessee is given liberty for restoration

Icp Holdings 1, Mauritius vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation - 2(1)(1), Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 2397/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia[Assessment Year : 2015-16] Icp Holdings 1 Vs Acit 4Th Floor, Raffles Tower International Taxation- 19 Bank Street, Cyber City 2(1)(1) Delhi Ebene, Mauritius-72201 Pan-Aacci6190E Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Ashik Shah, Ca Respondent By Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.12.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Instant Appeal Has Been Filed At The Instance Of The Assessee Seeking To Assail The Assessment Order Dated 28.03.2014 Passed U/S 147 R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Pertaining To Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. When The Matter Was Called For Hearing, An Application Dated 21.11.2024 Was Adverted On Behalf Of Assessee To Submit That The Assessee Is Opting For The Ongoing “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (Dtvsv) Scheme, 2024”. It Is Submitted That The Assessee Does Not Seek To Pursue The Said Appeal Owing To Exercise Of Option For Availing Dtvsv Scheme & Consequently Requested That The Written Application For Withdrawal Of Appeal May Please Be Granted. 3. The Ld. Sr. Dr For The Revenue Stated That She Has No Objection To Withdraw The Appeal As Sought On Behalf Of The Assessee. 4. In The Light Of Oral/Written Request Made On Behalf Of The Assessee, The Captioned Appeal Is Dismissed. However, In The Event, The Assessee Fails To Avail The Benefit Of Dtvsv Scheme For Any Bonafide Reasons, Then The Assessee Concerned Shall Be At Liberty To Seek Restoration Of Original Appeal For Hearing Before Itat In Accordance With Law. 5. In The Result, The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Dismissed As Withdrawn. Order Pronounced In The Open Court On 20Th December, 2024. (Mahavir Singh)

Section 147

hearing, an application dated 21.11.2024 was adverted on behalf of assessee to submit that the assessee is opting for the ongoing “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Scheme, 2024”. It is submitted that the assessee does not seek to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option

DCIT, Circle-21(1), New Delhi vs. Ranjitgarh Finance Co. P.Ltd, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7555/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Vimal Kumar[Assessment Year : 2014-15] Dcit Vs Ranjitgarh Finance Co.P.Ltd. Circle-21(1) Lp-11 C Pitampura New Delhi. New Delhi-110034. Pan-Aabcr8108C Appellant Respondent Appellant By Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. Dr Respondent By Shri Mukesh Sukhija, Adv. Date Of Hearing 19.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 19.12.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Instant Appeal Has Been Filed At The Instance Of The Revenue Seeking To Assail The First Appellate Order Dated 04.09.2018 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(A)-7, New Delhi [“Ld.Pr. Cit”] U/S 250(6) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 30.12.2016 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2014- 15. 2. When The Matter Was Called For Hearing, The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Submitted That As Per The Instruction Of The Client, The Assessee Is Opting For The Ongoing “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (Dtvsv) Scheme, 2024”. The Learned Counsel Thus Submitted That The Assessee Does Not Seek To Pursue The Said Appeal Owing To Exercise Of Option For Availing Dtvsv Scheme & Consequently Requested That The Written Application For Withdrawal Of Appeal May Please Be Granted.

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

Counsel for the assessee submitted that as per the instruction of the client, the assessee is opting for the ongoing “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Scheme, 2024”. The learned Counsel thus submitted that the assessee does not seek to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option