Meenakshi Kansal, Shamli vs. ITO, Ward-1(5), Shamli
The appeal is allowed
ITA 1079/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Feb 2021AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2010-11 Meenakshi Kansal, Vs Ito, C/O Prem Prakash, Advocate, Ward-1(5), 183/2, Shamli. North Civil Lines, Muzaffarnagar, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. Pan : Aykpk6549A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Prem Prakash Advocate & Shri Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Gaurav Dudeja, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 10.02.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.02.2021 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 22.11.2017 Of The Cit(A), Muzaffarnagar, Relating To The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee, At The Time Of Hearing, Sought Withdrawal Of The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Stating That The Assessee Has Opted To Settle The Dispute Relating To The Tax Arrears For The Assessment Year Under Consideration Under The Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. However, Form No.3 Is Yet To Be Obtained. He Accordingly Submitted That This Appeal May Be Allowed To Be Withdrawn. 3. In Absence Of Any Objection From The Side Of The Ld. Dr, The Request Of The Assessee For Withdrawal Of The Appeal Is Allowed.
For Appellant: Shri Prem Prakash Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Gaurav Dudeja, Sr. DR
stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. However, Form No.3 is yet to be obtained.
He accordingly submitted that this appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn