← All Phrases

“settlement application”

Settlement & AmnestySection 245CSection 245C247 judgments

The decision most relied on for settlement application is CIT v. CPR Capital Services Ltd. (331 ITR 483), cited in 29 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on settlement application

CIT v. CPR Capital Services Ltd.
331 ITR 483 · 2011 · High Court
29
citing judgments

If there is a change in the assessing officer, a new notice under section 143(2) should be issued, especially after a settlement application is filed or jurisdiction is transferred.

Star Television News Limited v. UOI & Others
317 ITR 66 · 2009 · High Court
22
citing judgments

The Settlement Commission must hear applications where delay in disposal before March 31, 2008, is not attributable to the applicant. Section 245HA(1)(iv) is arbitrary and unreasonable if an applicant faces hardship due to the Settlement Commission's inability to dispose of applications by a specified date.

Nanji Enterprise Ltd. v. DCIT
84 Taxmann.com 155 · 2017 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Income offered to tax under a settlement application with the Income Tax Settlement Commission cannot be taxed again in the hands of the assessee, as the settlement order by its statutory scheme is final.

Dolat Investments Ltd. v. DCIT
38 SOT 123 · 2010 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Confidential information disclosed to the Settlement Commission cannot be used by the Assessing Officer to make additions if the settlement application is not admitted under section 245D(1).

Ram Jethmalani v. Union of India
219 ITR 618 · 1996 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

Penalty proceedings do not fall within the ambit of Section 245E of the Income-tax Act, and the Settlement Commission exceeds its jurisdiction if it drops penalty proceedings while deciding a settlement application.

Omaxe Ltd. v. ACIT
254 CTR 370 · 2012 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Once an application is admitted by the Settlement Commission, it has exclusive jurisdiction over the assessee's case until a final order is passed, precluding the Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) from invoking reassessment provisions.

Komalkant Faikirchand Sharma v. DCIT
108 Taxmann.com 50 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Once an application for settlement is made under Section 245C(1) and accepted by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC), and a final order is passed under Section 245D(4), the Assessing Officer loses jurisdiction to reopen the assessment. An order under Section 245D(4) is distinct from a regular assessment under Sections 143(1), 143(3), or 144.

Gupta Perfumers (P.) Ltd. v. ITSC
348 ITR 86 · 2012 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Seized papers referred to in a settlement application, even if they belong to third persons, can be used and utilized against those third persons.

Judgments citing settlement application

Bhavya Marketing, Chennai vs. The ACIT, Corporate Circle-2(4), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1069/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1069/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2016-17 M/S. Bhavya Marketing, The Assistant Commissioner 2/7, Amman Koil Street, Vs. Of Income Tax, Metha Nagar, Corporate Circle 2(4), Chennai – 600 029. Chennai. Pan: Aaufa 4751A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024

For Appellant: Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 144Section 153CSection 250Section 271(1)(c)

vide judgment dated 17.11.2023 in a batch of cases (in which assessee also a party) in Writ Petition No.24537 of 2023 stated that all settlement applications in respect of the petitioners even in respect of the cases arising between 01.02.2021 to 31.03.2021 shall be deemed pending applications for the purpose ... 299/22/21-Dir.Inv.III dated 28.09.2021. As per the said order, one time relaxation was given to applications filed by the assessees who were eligible to file settlement applications as on 31.01.2021. However, the Interim Board of Settlement by its order u/s.245D(4) dated 31.07.2023, rejected the said application stating that there

Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madurai vs. Natarajan Sathishkumar, Palani

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA 198/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.196/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Acit Shri Gurusamy Dhanasekaran बनाम/ Central Circle-1 No.6/1, Sithanathan Street, Vs. Madurai. Palani, Dindigul Dist.-624 601. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Abtpd-3576-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.197/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Acit Shri Natarajan Saravanakumar बनाम/ Central Circle-1 No.6/1, Sithanathan Street, Vs. Madurai. Palani, Dindigul Dist.-624 601. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Azcps-8604-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.198/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Acit Shri Natarajan Satishkumar बनाम/ Central Circle-1 No.6/1, Sithanathan Street, Vs. Madurai. Palani, Dindigul Dist.-624 601. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Auhps-8894-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Ms. R. Anita (Addl.Cit)-Ld. Dr ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld. Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 29-08-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18-11-2024

For Appellant: Ms. R. Anita (Addl.CIT)-Ld. DRFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld. AR
Section 144Section 153C

other hand, referred to the findings of Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order as well as outcome of Settlement Application filed by the assessee- group. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, our adjudication would be as under. Assessment Proceedings 3.1 The assessee is stated ... establish the source of the same. 3.3 The assessee submitted that his major source of income was from partnership firms. Since the firms preferred settlement application, the source could be explained only from additional income earned and offered in the hands of the firms.The assessee stated that

Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madurai vs. Natarajan Saravanakumar, Palani

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA 197/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.196/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Acit Shri Gurusamy Dhanasekaran बनाम/ Central Circle-1 No.6/1, Sithanathan Street, Vs. Madurai. Palani, Dindigul Dist.-624 601. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Abtpd-3576-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.197/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Acit Shri Natarajan Saravanakumar बनाम/ Central Circle-1 No.6/1, Sithanathan Street, Vs. Madurai. Palani, Dindigul Dist.-624 601. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Azcps-8604-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.198/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Acit Shri Natarajan Satishkumar बनाम/ Central Circle-1 No.6/1, Sithanathan Street, Vs. Madurai. Palani, Dindigul Dist.-624 601. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Auhps-8894-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Ms. R. Anita (Addl.Cit)-Ld. Dr ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld. Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 29-08-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18-11-2024

For Appellant: Ms. R. Anita (Addl.CIT)-Ld. DRFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld. AR
Section 144Section 153C

other hand, referred to the findings of Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order as well as outcome of Settlement Application filed by the assessee- group. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, our adjudication would be as under. Assessment Proceedings 3.1 The assessee is stated ... establish the source of the same. 3.3 The assessee submitted that his major source of income was from partnership firms. Since the firms preferred settlement application, the source could be explained only from additional income earned and offered in the hands of the firms.The assessee stated that