← All Phrases

“dividend distribution tax”

Special Rate ProvisionsSection 115-OSection 115-O587 judgments

The decision most relied on for dividend distribution tax is Sesa Goa Ltd. v. JCIT (117 Taxmann.com 96), cited in 291 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on dividend distribution tax

Sesa Goa Ltd. v. JCIT
117 Taxmann.com 96 · 2020 · High Court
291
citing judgments

Education cess paid on total income and dividend distribution tax are allowable deductions for income tax purposes.

Trib.) Giesecke & Devrient 16.994%). India Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT
120 Taxmann.com 338 · 2020 · High Court
52
citing judgments

The provisions of a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) would prevail over the domestic law rate of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under Section 115-O.

Kerala Vision Ltd. v. ACIT (
35 Taxmann.com 463 · 2013 · ITAT
52
citing judgments

Transactions carried out on the purchase of off-the-shelf software prior to the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (October 15, 2011) are not liable for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS).

Loyal Motor Service Co. Ltd. v. CIT
14 ITR 647 · 1946 · High Court
48
citing judgments

A payment of bonus or commission is allowable as a business deduction under Section 36(1)(ii) unless it constitutes a distribution of profits or dividends, thereby distinguishing payments genuinely for services from those merely intended to escape taxation.

Union of India v. Tata Tea Co Ltd.
398 ITR 260 · 2017 · Supreme Court
38
citing judgments

Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) is a tax on the profits of the domestic company, not on the shareholder. The Supreme Court's decision in Tata Tea Co. Ltd. did not address the precise nature of DDT as a tax on the company versus the shareholder.

Torrent India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
35 Taxmann.com 300 · 2013 · High Court
36
citing judgments

Excess Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) paid by a company is refundable to the assessee, even though Section 115-O(4) states DDT is a final payment.

CIT v. Impact Containers Pvt. Ltd.
367 ITR 346 · 2014 · High Court
27
citing judgments

Section 2(22)(e) cannot be applied where the assessee is not a shareholder of the lending company, as its purpose is to prevent tax avoidance by distributing company profits as loans to shareholders.

SIDBI v. CBDT
133 Taxmann.com 158 · 2021 · High Court
23
citing judgments

Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under section 115-O is a charge on the company's profits and not on the income in the hands of the shareholder, meaning it does not constitute double taxation and is not subject to Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA).

Judgments citing dividend distribution tax

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2068/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2067/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2066/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2065/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2064/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2063/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2062/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2061/CHNY/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2060/CHNY/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2059/CHNY/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2058/CHNY/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

Tweezerman India Private Limited, Pondicherry vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry

The appeals stands dismissed

ITA 2057/CHNY/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jan 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (1) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2057/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2007-08) & (2) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) & (3) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2059/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2009-10) & (4) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2060/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & (5) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2061/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & (6) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2062/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & (7) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2063/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & (8) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2064/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & (9) आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2065/Chny/2024 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16)

For Appellant: S/Shri P. Lalith Kumar & Mehul (CAs) – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Shri S. Sundar Rajan (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115Section 237Section 250Section 90

Puducherry on 28-05-2022 rejecting an application filed by the assessee u/s 237 of the Act claiming refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The grounds raised by the assessee read as under: - Ground No. 1 - General The Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ... quashed. The detailed grounds of appeal, including the position in law and facts is set out in the ensuing paragraphs. Ground No.2 - Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the Company is a tax on shareholders income. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in facts and law, by considering that Dividend Distribution

M/S. Piaggio Vehicles Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 4, Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 868/PUN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.868/Pun/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Piaggio Vehicles Private Ltd., V The Assistant Sky One Corporate Park, S Commissioner Of Income Ground Floor, Survey Tax, Circle-4, Pune. No.239/02, Near Pune Airport, Pune – 411032. Pan: Aabcp1225G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Siddhesh Chaugule – Ar Revenue By Shri Vidya Ratan - Dr Date Of Hearing 18/12/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-13, Pune For Assessment Year 2015-16 Dated 06.10.2022 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. Refund Of Excess Taxes Paid On Dividend Distributed On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Hon'Ble Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Granting The Benefit Of Article 11 Of The India-

Section 115Section 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 4

erred in not granting the benefit of Article 11 of the India- Italy Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA') in determining the Dividend Distribution Tax ('DDT') payable, without appreciating the fact that the dividend declared and paid by the Appellant to Piaggio & C. S.p.A., Italy, being tax on dividend income should ... under : “7. Refund of excess taxes paid on the dividend distributed On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, as Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) represents tax on dividend income, the Appellant should be granted the benefit of Article II of the India-Italy double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA