← All Phrases

“Section 10(9)”

Section References (mined)Section 10Section 10(9)2 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 10(9) is CIT v. NIIT Ltd. (318 ITR 289), cited in 79 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 10(9)

CIT v. NIIT Ltd.
318 ITR 289 · 2009 · High Court
79
citing judgments

A composite agreement, even if charges are broken down, cannot be dissected to apply Section 194I for TDS on rent when the agreement is a business arrangement for mutual obligations.

CIT v. M. M.Khambatbala
198 ITR 144 · 1992 · High Court
67
citing judgments

Revisional powers under Section 263 can be exercised even if the issue is debatable, provided the order is erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interest.

IDS Software Solutions P. Ltd. v. ITO
122 TTJ 410 · 2009 · ITAT
50
citing judgments

An Indian company that exercises control and supervision over a seconded employee and bears the salary cost is an economic employer. Such a company is not liable to withhold tax on the reimbursement of salary to the overseas company, thereby avoiding disallowance under Section 40(a)(i).

CIT v. Emery Stone Manufacturing Company
213 ITR 843 · 1995 · High Court
43
citing judgments

The Commissioner can invoke revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 even when the assessee has disclosed all facts, if the Assessing Officer failed to examine those details in accordance with the correct provisions of law. Full disclosure does not provide immunity from revision if the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue due to the AO's inadequate inquiry.

Verizon Communications Singapore Pte. Ltd. v. ITO (International Taxation)
39 Taxmann.com 70 · 2013 · High Court
43
citing judgments

The case establishes that in the modern virtual world, an entity's virtual presence, rather than just physical presence, is key to determining its operational extent, especially when equipment is placed at customer premises. This principle guides the characterization of payments to non-residents, often as royalty, attracting withholding tax under Section 195, considering statutory explanations for deemed accrual of income.

Niko Resources Ltd. v. Union of India
374 ITR 369 · 2015 · High Court
40
citing judgments

The retrospective insertion of an Explanation to Section 80IB(9) of the Income Tax Act is unconstitutional. Blocks licensed under a single contract cannot be treated as a single undertaking for the purpose of deduction under Section 80IB(9).

Poompuhar Shipping Corporation Ltd. v. ITO
360 ITR 257 · 2014 · High Court
39
citing judgments

The 'use or right to use' of an asset, which is a condition for royalty income, is satisfied when possession and control are given to the hirer for their beneficial use, even if the owner retains ultimate ownership.

DIT v. Galileo International Inc.
224 CTR 251 · High Court
37
citing judgments

If the income attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India is less than the remuneration paid to a dependent agent, the assessment is extinguished and no further computation of income is required.

Judgments citing Section 10(9)