← All Phrases

“Section 10(37)(ii)”

Section References (mined)Section 10Section 10(37)(ii)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 10(37)(ii) is CIT v. Microlabs Ltd. (383 ITR 490), cited in 175 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 10(37)(ii)

CIT v. Microlabs Ltd.
383 ITR 490 · 2016 · High Court
175
citing judgments

If an assessee possesses interest-free funds exceeding investments in tax-free securities, it is presumed that investments are made from these own funds, precluding disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(ii). Additionally, weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB) is computed on the gross expenditure incurred, not net expenditure after reducing income earned.

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-2 v. Caraf Builders & Constructions (P.) Ltd.
112 Taxmann.com 322 · 2019 · Supreme Court
71
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot exceed the actual amount of exempt income earned by the assessee during the relevant previous year. This principle applies to assessment years prior to the amendment by Finance Bill 2022.

148 STC 225 (SC) (II) Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. v. CIT
7 SCC 592 · 2006 · Reported
25
citing judgments

The case establishes that benefits flowing out of statutory provisions cannot be denied to an assessee company. It also suggests that if the legislature intends to exclude certain deductions (like under Section 80IB(10)) from Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) calculations, a specific provision would be present in Section 115JB, similar to provisions found in Section 115JC.

(2017) 396 ITR 323 (Guj.); (ii) Jaipur Development Authority v. CIT
57 Taxmann.com 6 · 2015 · Reported
18
citing judgments

Decisions holding that an assessee does not exist for a charitable purpose are not applicable if the issue involved in those cases pertains to cancellation of registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act.

Herbalife International India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
65 Taxmann.com 143 · 2016 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

The Non-Discrimination clause in tax treaties, such as the India-US and India-Japan treaties, prevents disallowance of expenses paid to associated enterprises where the clause is pari materia, even if the Assessing Officer initially disallowed a portion.

10. In Vijaya Laxmi Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
191 ITR 641 · 1991 · Supreme Court
13
citing judgments

Expenses are deductible under Section 57 only if they are incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of earning income. There must be a direct nexus between the expenditure and the earning of income.

DCIT v. Tata Sons Ltd.
43 SOT 27 · 2011 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

State taxes paid overseas cannot be allowed as a deduction in view of Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, subsequent judicial pronouncements may alter this position.

CIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd.
271 ITR 3311 · 2004 · Reported
11
citing judgments

Education cess is not an allowable deduction under section 37(1) read with section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This is because it is in the nature of a tax, not an expenditure incurred for the purpose of business.

Judgments citing Section 10(37)(ii)