← All Phrases

“registration under section 12A”

Charitable TrustsSection 12ASection 12A2,527 judgments

The decision most relied on for registration under section 12A is ACIT v. Surat City Gymkhana (300 ITR 214), cited in 125 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on registration under section 12A

ACIT v. Surat City Gymkhana
300 ITR 214 · 2008 · Supreme Court
125
citing judgments

Once an institution receives registration under Section 12AA, the Assessing Officer must compute its income as per Section 11, focusing only on the application of income and not re-examining the charitable nature of its activities. The Supreme Court also clarified the meaning and scope of 'general public utility' under Section 2(15).

Ananda Social and Educational Trust v. CIT
426 ITR 340 · 2020 · Supreme Court
116
citing judgments

For registration under Section 12AA, the Commissioner (Exemptions) must examine the objects of the trust and the genuineness of its proposed activities, even if the trust has not yet commenced actual charitable activities or incurred expenditure.

Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v. ACIT
396 ITR 323 · 2017 · High Court
108
citing judgments

Development authorities can continue to be regarded as existing for a 'Charitable Purpose' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, even after the introduction of the proviso to that section. The contention that such authorities automatically lose their charitable status due to the proviso is incorrect.

CIT v. Gujarat Maritime Board
295 ITR 561 · 2007 · Supreme Court
98
citing judgments

A statutory corporation undertaking activities that generate income qualifies as a charitable entity under Section 2(15) if its dominant object is general public utility and it is legally obligated to apply its income solely for that purpose, even if the activities appear to be in the nature of trade or business. Such an entity is entitled to registration under Section 12A and exemptions under Section 11.

CIT v. Dawoodi Bohra Jamat
364 ITR 31 · 2014 · Supreme Court
83
citing judgments

A trust's objects, even if based on religious tenets, can qualify as charitable for tax exemptions if its benefits are not exclusively restricted to a particular religious community or caste.

CIT v. Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association
140 ITR 1 · 1983 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

An object beneficial to a section of the public, as distinguished from an individual or group of individuals, qualifies as an object of general public utility under Section 2(15) and hence a charitable purpose. This applies even if the benefits are restricted to a specific caste, community, or professional group.

CIT v. Parma Nand
268 ITR 172 · 2004 · High Court
81
citing judgments

Whether there was sufficient cause for delay in making applications for registration under section 12A and 80G is always a question of fact, and contumacious conduct by the assessee must be established for levying penalty under section 271C for non-deduction of TDS.

Barendra Prasad Ray v. ITO
129 ITR 295 · 1981 · Supreme Court
80
citing judgments

When determining if an activity serves charitable purposes for tax exemption, the primary consideration is whether its predominant object is to make a profit or to carry out charitable activities.

Judgments citing registration under section 12A

Baramati Vipassana Samiti, Baramati vs. CIT, Exemptions, Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2643/PUN/2024[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Apr 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2642 & 2643/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2025-26 Baramati Vipassana Samiti, V The Commissioner Of Ward-I, 62000736, Chiman S Income Tax, Exemption, Shah Mala, Baramati, Pune. Maharashtra – 413102. Pan: Aaetb7354C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Rajendra Agiwal – Ar Revenue By Shri Chandra Vijay – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 23/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 03/04/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Manish Borad, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Rejecting The Application For Grant Of Registration U/S.12A & 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Respectively. For The Sake Of Convenience, These Two Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

Section 12ASection 36ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Samajik Sanskrutik Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha vs CIT(E) in ITA No.376/NAG/2023 vide order dated 09.07.2024. Therefore, ld.AR pleaded that assessee may be granted registration under section 12A of the Act. Ld.AR submitted that there is no provision in the section 80G for the ld.CIT(E) to reject assessee’s application ... Samajik Sanskrutik Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha vs CIT(E) in ITA No.376/NAG/2023 has allowed the assessee’s appeal and directed ld.CIT(E) to grant registration under section 12A of the Act. In these facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that Assessee is eligible for registration under

Baramati Vipassana Samiti, Baramati vs. CIT, Exemption, Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2642/PUN/2024[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Apr 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2642 & 2643/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2025-26 Baramati Vipassana Samiti, V The Commissioner Of Ward-I, 62000736, Chiman S Income Tax, Exemption, Shah Mala, Baramati, Pune. Maharashtra – 413102. Pan: Aaetb7354C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Rajendra Agiwal – Ar Revenue By Shri Chandra Vijay – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 23/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 03/04/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Manish Borad, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Rejecting The Application For Grant Of Registration U/S.12A & 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Respectively. For The Sake Of Convenience, These Two Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

Section 12ASection 36ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Samajik Sanskrutik Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha vs CIT(E) in ITA No.376/NAG/2023 vide order dated 09.07.2024. Therefore, ld.AR pleaded that assessee may be granted registration under section 12A of the Act. Ld.AR submitted that there is no provision in the section 80G for the ld.CIT(E) to reject assessee’s application ... Samajik Sanskrutik Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha vs CIT(E) in ITA No.376/NAG/2023 has allowed the assessee’s appeal and directed ld.CIT(E) to grant registration under section 12A of the Act. In these facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that Assessee is eligible for registration under

Women Empowerment Foundation, Ahmedabad vs. The CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2209/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita Nos.2208/Ahd/2024 & 2209/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : -Na- Women Empowerment The Cit (Exemption) बनाम/ Foundation Ahmedabad – 380 015 V/S. 7, Surohi Park-2 Opp. Rushikesh Garden Nava Nikol Khodiyarnagar S.O., Ahmedabad – 382 350 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aaatw 4894 N (अपीलाथ$/ Appellant) (%& यथ$/ Respondent) Assessee By : Adjournment Application Filed Revenue By : Shri Pushpendra Singh Chaudhary, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 02/04/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am: Both These Are Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee-Trust Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad: • Order Dated 21.11.2024, Passed Under Section 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) Rejecting The Application For Registration In Form 10Ab; & • Order Dated 25.11.2024, Passed Under Section 80G(5) Of The Act, Rejecting The Application For Approval.

For Appellant: Adjournment Application filedFor Respondent: Shri Pushpendra Singh Chaudhary, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable-trust duly registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. It filed applications in Form No. 10AB on 18.06.2024 seeking (i) re-registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act and (ii) approval under section 80G(5) of the Act. 4. The Ld. CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad rejected

Women Empowerment Foundation, Ahmedabad vs. The CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2208/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita Nos.2208/Ahd/2024 & 2209/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : -Na- Women Empowerment The Cit (Exemption) बनाम/ Foundation Ahmedabad – 380 015 V/S. 7, Surohi Park-2 Opp. Rushikesh Garden Nava Nikol Khodiyarnagar S.O., Ahmedabad – 382 350 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aaatw 4894 N (अपीलाथ$/ Appellant) (%& यथ$/ Respondent) Assessee By : Adjournment Application Filed Revenue By : Shri Pushpendra Singh Chaudhary, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 02/04/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am: Both These Are Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee-Trust Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad: • Order Dated 21.11.2024, Passed Under Section 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) Rejecting The Application For Registration In Form 10Ab; & • Order Dated 25.11.2024, Passed Under Section 80G(5) Of The Act, Rejecting The Application For Approval.

For Appellant: Adjournment Application filedFor Respondent: Shri Pushpendra Singh Chaudhary, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable-trust duly registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. It filed applications in Form No. 10AB on 18.06.2024 seeking (i) re-registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act and (ii) approval under section 80G(5) of the Act. 4. The Ld. CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad rejected