← All Phrases

“appeal before CIT(A)”

AppealsSection 246ASection 246A1,827 judgments

The decision most relied on for appeal before CIT(A) is CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd. (38 ITD 320), cited in 2,267 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on appeal before CIT(A)

CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.
38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
2,267
citing judgments

An appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal can be dismissed for non-prosecution or treated as unadmitted when the appellant fails to appear, cooperate, or show diligence, in accordance with Rule 19(2) of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules. The law aids the vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights.

CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another
118 ITR 461 · 1997 · Supreme Court
1,656
citing judgments

Appealing a tax assessment requires more than just filing the appeal; it involves actively pursuing it. The assessee must effectively engage with the appellate process.

Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT
187 ITR 688 · 1991 · Supreme Court
1,372
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) possesses co-terminus powers with the Assessing Officer and can direct the Assessing Officer to perform actions he failed to do, but cannot introduce a new source of income in the assessment. The appellate assessment must be confined to the items of income that were the subject matter of the original assessment.

CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders
349 ITR 336 · 2012 · High Court
956
citing judgments

Appellate authorities can entertain fresh claims or revised computations of income made by an assessee, even if these were not submitted through a revised return of income.

CIT v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)
297 CTR 614 · 2017 · High Court
659
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) cannot dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution or default in appearance. Under Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, the CIT(A) must decide the appeal on its merits, even in an ex parte proceeding.

Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT
199 ITR 351 · 1993 · High Court
441
citing judgments

Appellate authorities can consider additional grounds for deduction, even if not originally claimed before the Assessing Officer or Appellate Assistant Commissioner, provided the facts are not disputed and it pertains to a legal claim for correct tax liability. This is because the purpose of an appeal is to ascertain the correct tax liability.

CIT v. Kanpur Coal Syndicate
53 ITR 225 · 1964 · Supreme Court
359
citing judgments

The Commissioner (Appeals) holds plenary powers when disposing of an appeal, with their scope being coterminous with the Assessing Officer. This allows the CIT(A) to exercise all powers of the AO, including admitting additional evidence and redetermining income.

New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT
296 ITR 495 · 2008 · High Court
351
citing judgments

The High Court can return a reference unanswered if the assessee fails to appear or provide assistance. This illustrates the broader principle that appellate authorities have inherent power to dismiss appeals for non-prosecution when a party does not effectively pursue their case.

Judgments citing appeal before CIT(A)

Microsoft Corporation (India) P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle 16(1), New Delhi

ITA 549/DEL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6031/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22 Munjal Hospitality Private Limited, Um House, Plot No.35, 3Rd Floor, Tower A, Sector-44, Dlf Qe, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. Pan No.Aaccv4293M अपीलार्थी Appellant बनाम The Assessing Officer, Vs. National Faceless Assessee By Shri Jeet Kamdar, Ar (Virtual) Assessment Centre, Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr Circle-17(1), C.R. Building, Delhi. प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.3897/Del/2019 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2009-10 Zte Telecom India Pvt. Limited, Tower-10B, 6Th Floor, Dlf Cyber City, Phase-Ii, Gurgaon, Haryana. बनाम Acit, Vs. Circle-4(1), Hsiidc Building, Udyog Vihar, Phase-05, Gurgaon, Haryana. Pan No.Aaacz1958K अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ankit Sahni, Adv. & Ms. Taranjeet Kaur, Ar Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.3922/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Incedo Technology Solutions Limited बनाम Dcit, A-47, Lower Ground Floor, Hauz Khas, Delhi. Vs. Circle 10(1), Delhi. Pan No.Aacci6243C अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Rohit Tiwar, Adv. & Ms. Tanya, Advocate Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr 1

Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 153Section 92C

objections are filed, the statutory mechanism consumes time by design. Still it remains expeditious way of finalization of dispute as stage of appeal before CIT(A) is done 11 ITA Nos. 6031/D/2024,3897/D/2019, 3922/D/2024, 3809/D/2024 & 549/D/2023 away with if option to file objection before DRP is chosen by the Assessee

Veetee Fine Foods Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessee pertaining to assessment

ITA 853/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.853/Del/2016 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 बनाम Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. Dcit, 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Vs. Circle-26(1), Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.959/Del/2016 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 बनाम Dcit, Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Circle-26(1), Vs. New Delhi. Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2572/Del/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 बनाम Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. Addl. Cit 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Vs. Special Range-9, Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.7371/Del/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 बनाम Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. Addl. Cit 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Vs. Special Range-9, Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 153Section 92C

objections are filed, the statutory mechanism consumes time by design. Still it remains expeditious way of finalization of dispute as stage of appeal before CIT(A) is done away with if option to file objection before DRP is chosen by the Assessee. Further, demand crystallizes only after DRP direction