← All Phrases

“legal representative”

Chapter I - PreliminarySection 2 - DefinitionsSection 2(29)662 judgments

The decision most relied on for legal representative is 2 CIT v. Indrajit Singh Suri (33 Taxmann.com 281), cited in 100 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on legal representative

2 CIT v. Indrajit Singh Suri
33 Taxmann.com 281 · 2013 · High Court
100
citing judgments

The validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 against legal representatives of a deceased assessee requires a demonstrable 'reason to believe' that income escaped assessment, often based on third-party information such as alleged accommodation entries.

Savita Kapila v. ACIT
118 Taxmann.com 46 · 2020 · High Court
98
citing judgments

There is no legal requirement for a legal representative to report an assessee's death to the income tax department; consequently, a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 to a deceased person is invalid as it lacks proper jurisdiction.

Chandreshbhai Jayantibhai Patel v. ITO
101 Taxmann.com 362 · 2019 · High Court
46
citing judgments

A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is a jurisdictional notice and a condition precedent for reassessment. Such a notice issued against a deceased person is valid if the legal representative submits to the Assessing Officer without raising any objection.

CIT v. Amarchand N. Shroff
48 ITR 59 · 1963 · Supreme Court
40
citing judgments

Assessment proceedings initiated against a deceased person are void. Once an assessee dies, assessment proceedings can only continue in the name of their legal representative, to the extent of the deceased's estate.

202 ITR 932, CIT v. Durgawati
31 ITR 603 · 1957 · High Court
36
citing judgments

The same income cannot be assessed substantively in multiple hands. However, this principle does not prevent a single consolidated assessment order for multiple legal representatives.

CIT v. Jai Prakash Singh
219 ITR 737 · 1996 · Supreme Court
36
citing judgments

A procedural defect in serving notices, such as issuing them after the assessee's death without proper service on legal representatives, can invalidate reassessment proceedings and render assessment orders void. However, an omission or defect in serving notices does not erase a tax liability created by substantive provisions, though it may render an order irregular.

Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO
260 Taxmann 412 · 2019 · High Court
25
citing judgments

A notice issued to a deceased assessee or their legal representatives beyond the period of limitation is without jurisdiction and cannot be saved by Section 292B.

ITO Ward 1(3)(7), Surat v. Durlabhbhai Kanubhai Rajpara
114 Taxmann.com 482 · 2020 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

An assessment or reassessment proceeding initiated or continued against a deceased person after their demise is illegal and void ab initio, as no valid notice can be issued to a dead individual.

Judgments citing legal representative

Estate of Late Shri.Davendra Chtandas Ahuja(Through Mrs. Tania Deol, the Legal Representative of the Estat/Will), Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer-17(1)(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 2011/MUM/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Jun 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.2011/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2004-05) Estate Of Late Shri बिधम/ Ito, Ward-17(1)(3) Davendra Chetandas Ahuja Room No. 116, 1St Floor, Vs. (Through Mrs. Tania Deol, Aayakar Bhavan, The Legal Representative Of Mumbai-400020. The Estate/Will) 502, Raheja Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaapa8072C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Smt. Riddhi Mishra (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 29/05/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 14/06/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-28, Mumbai Dated 06.12.2017 For The Ay 2004-05. 2. At The Outset, The Ld. Cit-Dr Brought To Our Notice That Despite This Appeal Being Fixed Several Times For Hearing, The Assessee/Ld. Ar Does Not Appear, Therefore, The Appeal May Be Heard & Disposed Off Ex-Parte Qua Assessee. 3. We Have Heard The Ld. Cit-Dr & Perused The Material On Records. We Note That The Appeal Has Been Fixed For Hearing Twenty (20) Times & Non-Appeared For The Assessee After 29.12.2022. We Note That The Assessee Has Raised Legal Issue Challenging The Reopening Of The Assessment. We Note That The Ao Has Given The Reason For Reopening Which Reads As Under: -

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Riddhi Mishra (DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 68

Late Shri बिधम/ ITO, Ward-17(1)(3) Davendra Chetandas Ahuja Room No. 116, 1st Floor, Vs. (Through Mrs. Tania Deol, Aayakar Bhavan, the legal representative of Mumbai-400020. the Estate/Will) 502, Raheja Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAPA8072C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent ... Shri Devendra Ahuja passed away on 20.08.2010. So the deceased assessee is represented in this appeal by Ms. Tania Deol (daughter of assessee) viz, legal representative of Shri Davendra C. Ahuja who has contested the AO’s action of reopening the relevant AY. 2004-05. Since neither any averments