← All Phrases

“eligible business”

DeductionsSection 80IASection 80IA975 judgments

The decision most relied on for eligible business is Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO (322 ITR 283), cited in 1,283 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on eligible business

Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO
322 ITR 283 · 2010 · Supreme Court
1,283
citing judgments

The interest income earned by a cooperative society from investing its surplus funds in fixed deposits with banks is not "derived from" its eligible business activities and is taxable as "income from other sources" under Section 56, thus not qualifying for deduction under Section 80P.

State Bank Of India v. CIT
389 ITR 578 · 2016 · High Court
817
citing judgments

Income arising from a cooperative society's surplus funds invested in short-term deposits and securities is not attributable to the society's core activities and, therefore, is not eligible for exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

Liberty India v. CIT
317 ITR 218 · 2009 · Supreme Court
571
citing judgments

The Supreme Court clarified that for profits and gains to be eligible for deductions under sections like 10B, 80IA, or 80IB, the income must be "derived from" or have a direct nexus to the eligible business activity. Income from incidental sources like the sale of scrips/licenses or interest on employee loans is generally not considered as derived from the eligible business for such deductions.

CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.
348 ITR 302 · 2012 · Supreme Court
540
citing judgments

Goodwill, whether arising from an amalgamation or a slump sale, is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act. While the assessee must prove the existence and valuation of such goodwill, it is recognized as a depreciable asset.

Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. v. ACIT
397 ITR 1 · 2017 · Supreme Court
499
citing judgments

A co-operative credit society engaged in banking business with the general public, accepting deposits from non-members and advancing loans to non-members, is treated as a co-operative bank. Such a society falls under the exclusionary clause of Section 80P(4) and is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO
188 Taxmann 282 · 2010 · Supreme Court
486
citing judgments

Interest income earned by a co-operative society from investments, particularly with co-operative banks, is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P as it is not attributable to the core business activities of the society and constitutes "other income", not "profits and gains of business".

Pandian Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT
262 ITR 278 · 2003 · Supreme Court
353
citing judgments

Income eligible for deduction under Section 80IA or 80IC must have a direct nexus with the eligible business activity of the industrial undertaking. Income merely incidental to the business, even if part of the assessee's overall business, is not considered "derived from" the eligible undertaking.

CIT v. Sterling Foods
237 ITR 579 · 1999 · Supreme Court
311
citing judgments

Income eligible for profit-linked deductions under sections like 80-IC or 10B must have a direct nexus to the eligible business activity or be derived from the industrial undertaking itself, and not merely attributable to it or arising from a post-manufacturing event.

Judgments citing eligible business

DCIT (Ltu)-1, Mumbai vs. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd, Mumbai

ITA 5935/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am Ι.Τ.Α. No. 5848/Mum/2017 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited (Since Amalgamated With Grasim Industries Ltd.), Corporate Finance Division, A2, Aditya Birla Centre, A Wing, 2Nd Floor, S.K. Ahire Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400030. Pan: Aaaci1747H Vs. The Acit- Ltu-1, World Trade Centre, 29Th Floor, Centre-1, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400005. Appellant) : Respondent) Ι.Τ.Α. No. 5935/Mum/2017 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) The Dcit- Ltu-1, World Trade Centre, 29Th Floor, Centre-1, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400005. Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited (Since Amalgamated With Grasim Industries Ltd.), Corporate Finance Division, A2, Aditya Birla Centre, A Wing, 2Nd Floor, S.K. Ahire Marg, Vs. Worli, Mumbai-400030. Pan : Aaaci1747H Respondent) Appellant) Appellant/Assessee By : Shri Ronak Doshi / Riken Shah, Ar Revenue/Respondent By : Shri Ashish Kumar Agrawal, Sr. Dr. Date Of Hearing : 25.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.07.2024 Order Per Padmavathy S, Am: These Cross Appeals By The Assessee & The Revenue Are Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-55, Mumbai Dated 27.06.2017 For

For Appellant: Shri Ronak Doshi / Riken ShahFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Kumar Agrawal, Sr
Section 10BSection 115JSection 14ASection 32(1)(iia)Section 37Section 40Section 43BSection 80I

2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM

Digvijai Polytex Private Limited, Rajapalayam vs. ACIT Corp Circle, Madurai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 343/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.343/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Digvijai Polytex Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of 61, Kumarasamy Raja Nagar, Income Tax, Rajapalayam 626 108. Corporate Circle, Madurai. [Pan: Aaacd 9673K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. J. Prabhakar & Shri. S. Muralidhar, Chartered Accountants. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl. Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.06.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri ()

For Appellant: Shri. J. Prabhakar, & Shri. S. MuralidharFor Respondent: Shri. ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)Section 28Section 80Section 801Section 801ASection 80A(4)Section 80I

From the above provisions, it is clear that the deduction under section 80-IA is available @100% of the profits and gains derived from eligible business. As per Scheme of the Act, the net profit or income from any business is to be computed as per the provisions contained ... those provisions. Therefore, it cannot be said that the interest received on deposits with banks is a part of the profit of eligible business or an income from business. The appellant has itself shown the interest on deposits under the heads 'Income from other sources' in the return of income

Kds Wind Farms Private Limited, Pollachi vs. ITO, Corporate Ward-2, Coimbatore

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1249/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1261/Chny/2017 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Dcit M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Limited बनाम/ Corporate Circle-1 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Vs. Coimbatore. Pollachi-642 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1247/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1248/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 4.आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1249/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Ltd. Dcit / Ito बनाम/ 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Corporate Circle-1, Corp. Ward-2 Vs. Pollachi-642 001. Coimbatore. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan (Addl.Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-05-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-06-2024

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl.CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 80I

installed windmills. The firm was renamed as KWF and was subsequently converted into a Private Ltd. company. The eligible business, being the windmill, installed by the firm was continued by the Private Ltd. Company. It was not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence

M/S Kds Wind Farms Private Limited, Pollachi vs. ITO, Corporate Ward-2, Coimbatore

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1248/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jun 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1261/Chny/2017 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Dcit M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Limited बनाम/ Corporate Circle-1 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Vs. Coimbatore. Pollachi-642 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1247/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1248/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 4.आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1249/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Ltd. Dcit / Ito बनाम/ 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Corporate Circle-1, Corp. Ward-2 Vs. Pollachi-642 001. Coimbatore. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan (Addl.Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-05-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-06-2024

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl.CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 80I

installed windmills. The firm was renamed as KWF and was subsequently converted into a Private Ltd. company. The eligible business, being the windmill, installed by the firm was continued by the Private Ltd. Company. It was not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence

M/S Kds Wind Farms Private Limited, Pollachi vs. DCIT, Corporate Circle-I, Coimbatore

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1247/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1261/Chny/2017 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Dcit M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Limited बनाम/ Corporate Circle-1 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Vs. Coimbatore. Pollachi-642 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1247/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1248/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 4.आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1249/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Ltd. Dcit / Ito बनाम/ 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Corporate Circle-1, Corp. Ward-2 Vs. Pollachi-642 001. Coimbatore. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan (Addl.Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-05-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-06-2024

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl.CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 80I

installed windmills. The firm was renamed as KWF and was subsequently converted into a Private Ltd. company. The eligible business, being the windmill, installed by the firm was continued by the Private Ltd. Company. It was not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence

DCIT, Coimbatore vs. Kds Wind Farms Pvt Ltd., Pollachi

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1261/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1261/Chny/2017 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Dcit M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Limited बनाम/ Corporate Circle-1 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Vs. Coimbatore. Pollachi-642 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1247/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1248/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 4.आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1249/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Kds Wind Farms Private Ltd. Dcit / Ito बनाम/ 75/1, Dr. Ansari Street, Corporate Circle-1, Corp. Ward-2 Vs. Pollachi-642 001. Coimbatore. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaeck-7320-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan (Addl.Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-05-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-06-2024

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl.CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 80I

installed windmills. The firm was renamed as KWF and was subsequently converted into a Private Ltd. company. The eligible business, being the windmill, installed by the firm was continued by the Private Ltd. Company. It was not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence

Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward-6(1), Chennai vs. Sjlt Textiles Pvt. Ltd., Chennai

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 688/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.686, 687 & 688/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Sjlt Textiles, 2E, 2Nd Floor, Prince Arcade Corporate Ward 6(1), Chennai 600 034. Cathedral Road, Chennai 600 086. [Pan: Aaics2028M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Ar. V. Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Sandhyaarthi, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 06.05.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 17.05.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: All The Above Three Appeals Are Filed By The Revenue Against Separate Orders Dated 30.03.2023 & 31.03.2023 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi For The Assessment Years 2015-16 & 2017-18 & 2018-19 Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri AR. V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Ms. Sandhyaarthi, C.A
Section 80I

fetch in the open market, i.e., the price which has been adopted by respondent for the electricity generated by 6 I.T.A. Nos.686, 687 & 688/Chny/23 eligible business used for captive consumption for the purpose of computing profits and gains of the eligible business under section 80IA of the Act. She drew

Incometax Officer, Corporate Ward 6(1), Chennai vs. Sjlt Textiles, Chennai

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 687/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.686, 687 & 688/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Sjlt Textiles, 2E, 2Nd Floor, Prince Arcade Corporate Ward 6(1), Chennai 600 034. Cathedral Road, Chennai 600 086. [Pan: Aaics2028M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Ar. V. Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Sandhyaarthi, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 06.05.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 17.05.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: All The Above Three Appeals Are Filed By The Revenue Against Separate Orders Dated 30.03.2023 & 31.03.2023 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi For The Assessment Years 2015-16 & 2017-18 & 2018-19 Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri AR. V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Ms. Sandhyaarthi, C.A
Section 80I

fetch in the open market, i.e., the price which has been adopted by respondent for the electricity generated by 6 I.T.A. Nos.686, 687 & 688/Chny/23 eligible business used for captive consumption for the purpose of computing profits and gains of the eligible business under section 80IA of the Act. She drew