← All Phrases

“Section 161(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 161Section 161(1)27 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 161(1) is Gajanan Constructions v. Dy, CIT (161 ITD 313), cited in 143 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 161(1)

Gajanan Constructions v. Dy, CIT
161 ITD 313 · 2016 · ITAT
143
citing judgments

Fee under section 234E cannot be charged for the period prior to 01.06.2015, as the power to charge such fee was vested with the prescribed authority only upon substitution of clause (c) to section 200A by the Finance Act, 2015, effective from that date.

CIT v. Hindustan Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd.
161 ITR 524 · 1986 · Supreme Court
71
citing judgments

Income does not arise or accrue when the right to receive payment or compensation is inchoate, contingent, or in dispute, as such a right does not create a debt. This principle determines the correct year of taxability, particularly for compensation under litigation.

CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s
108 ITR 555 · 1977 · Supreme Court
46
citing judgments

Where the shares of beneficiaries in a trust are determinate, trustees must be assessed separately for each beneficiary's share, treating each beneficiary as an individual. The income is then taxed at the marginal rate applicable to individuals, not at the maximum rate for an association of persons.

Chandan Gupta v. CIT
340 ITR 161 · 2012 · High Court
38
citing judgments

An assessee fails the 'Human Probability Test' when they cannot establish the genuineness of a claim for exempt income under section 10(38) and attempt to conceal unaccounted cash. Share transaction profits credited to an assessee's bank account must be added as income under section 68 if the receipt cannot be explained.

R.C. Gupta v. Commissioner of Income Tax
298 ITR 161 · 2008 · High Court
34
citing judgments

Contractual liabilities are allowable deductions in the year the liability is incurred, even if disputed by the assessee, rather than the year of actual payment or dispute resolution.

CIT: 106 ITR 64 (HP) DCIT V. Sreeni Printers: 67 STC 279 (Ker.) KrishanLal Shiv Chand Rai v. CIT
30 ITD 161 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

A statement recorded during a search cannot be the sole basis for an addition to income, especially if made in violation of CBDT instructions and the provisions of section 132(4).

Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT (supra).The Mumbai ITAT
161 Taxmann.com 511 · 2024 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

ESOP compensation expenditure and the discount on the issue of ESOPs are allowable as deductions under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

231) (Delhi Trib) (b) ACIT v. Shanker Nebhumal Uttamchandani
161 Taxmann.com 536 · 2024 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

Electronic records downloaded from electronic items cannot be relied upon at face value and require corroboration with other evidence for income-tax additions.

Judgments citing Section 161(1)