← All Phrases

“domestic company”

Chapter I - PreliminarySection 2 - DefinitionsSection 2(22A) / ITR-6540 judgments

The decision most relied on for domestic company is CIT v. ITC Ltd. (236 Taxmann 612), cited in 108 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on domestic company

CIT v. ITC Ltd.
236 Taxmann 612 · 2016 · High Court
108
citing judgments

When computing deduction under Section 80IA, specifically for inter-unit transfer of power, the benefit cannot be claimed based on rates chargeable by distribution licensees to consumers. The deduction must be computed based on the rate fixed by the Tariff Regulation Commission for sale by electricity generating companies.

Sky High Appeal XLIII Leasing Company Ltd. v. ACIT
177 Taxmann.com 579 · ITAT
85
citing judgments

The Multilateral Instrument (MLI) does not become legally enforceable under domestic law without a specific notification under section 90(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for each affected Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited
395 ITR 247 · 2017 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 80IA is allowable for captive power generation. The price for calculating this deduction is the rate at which the electricity board supplies power to its consumers, rather than the rate at which power generating companies supply to the electricity board.

Union of India v. Tata Tea Co Ltd.
398 ITR 260 · 2017 · Supreme Court
38
citing judgments

Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) is a tax on the profits of the domestic company, not on the shareholder. The Supreme Court's decision in Tata Tea Co. Ltd. did not address the precise nature of DDT as a tax on the company versus the shareholder.

Skoda Auto India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT, Aurangabad
30 SOT 319 · 2009 · ITAT
26
citing judgments

The Tribunal may allow adjustments for differences between the tested party and comparable companies to eliminate material differences, provided accurate and credible evidence is furnished.

SwissRe Global Business Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
116 Taxmann.com 716 · 2020 · Reported
13
citing judgments

Working capital adjustment is an accepted adjustment provided for better comparability in transfer pricing. The Tribunal has held that working capital adjustment is necessary for better comparability.

ITO v. Strides Arcolab Ltd.
24 Taxmann.com 89 · 2012 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A is applicable to investments made in shares of domestic companies but not foreign companies.

Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi Bank Ltd. v. CIT
108 Taxmann.com 242 · 2019 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A non-domestic company's Permanent Establishment (PE) in India cannot be taxed at a rate higher than that applicable to a domestic company carrying out the same activities, even considering retrospective amendments to tax treaties.

Judgments citing domestic company

Tc Tours Limited, Mumbai vs. ITO (TDS) (OSD) Circle 2(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1253/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm & Smt. Renu Jauhri, Am & Tc Tours Limited Ito (Tds) (Osd) Circle 2(3), 1St Floor, Thomascook Building, D. N. Mumbai Vs. Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400001. Pan/Gir No. Aabct5333R (Appellant) : (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri. Madhur Agarwal A/W. Ms. Pratiksha Jain : Shri. Ajit Pal Singh, Sr. Dr. Respondent By Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.04.2025 O R D E R Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M: These Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Challenges The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Addl/Jcit (A)-11, Delhi (‘Ld. Cit(A)’ For Short), Passed U/S.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act'), Pertaining To The Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ For Short) 2021-22. Ita No. 1253/Mum/2025; (Assessment Year: 2021-22) 2. At The Time Of Hearing, The Ld. Ar Brought To Our Attention That The Assessee Had Physically Filed The Appeal On 21.02.2025 & Subsequently E-Filed Again On 24.02.2025. It Is Observed That The Appeal Has Been Assigned Two Numbers I.E., Ita No. 1187/Mum/2025 & 1253/Mum/2024 & Is Listed On Same Date I.E., 16.04.2025. The

For Appellant: Shri. Madhur Agarwal a/w. Ms
Section 133ASection 194Section 201(1)Section 250

also based on an incorrect DIN number.” 5. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a domestic company engaged in the business of tours and travels. The assessee has the IATA license, which is required for ITA No. 1187 & 1253/Mum/2025 (A.Y. 2021-22) TC Tours Limited booking