← All Phrases

“foreign tax credit”

International TaxSection 90 / Rule 128Section 90 / Rule 128571 judgments

The decision most relied on for foreign tax credit is Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad (8 SCC 266), cited in 163 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on foreign tax credit

Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad
8 SCC 266 · 1999 · Supreme Court
163
citing judgments

If a statute or law prescribes that a thing must be done in a particular manner, then it must be done in that manner alone and in no other way. This principle mandates strict adherence to statutory procedures.

Wipro Ltd. v. DCIT
382 ITR 179 · 2016 · High Court
122
citing judgments

Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowable even if no tax is paid in India on the corresponding income due to deductions under sections 10A or 10AA, or losses in other units. The scope of income eligible for deduction under Section 10AA includes interest on deposits and realized gains on forward contracts.

Ms. Brinda Ramakrishna v. ITO
135 Taxmann.com 358 · 2022 · ITAT
109
citing judgments

The filing of Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is a directory requirement, not mandatory. Rule 128(9) does not provide for disallowance of FTC due to delay in filing this form. Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) override domestic law.

CIT v. ACE Multitaxes Systems (P.) Ltd.
317 ITR 207 · 2009 · High Court
107
citing judgments

For claiming relief under Chapter VI-A deductions like Section 80IB or 80IA, the audit report in Form 10CCB is not mandatory to be filed with the return of income, but can be submitted before the assessment is completed.

Sambhaji and Others v. Gangabai and Others
17 SCC 117 · 2008 · Supreme Court
87
citing judgments

Procedural law serves as an aid to justice, not an obstruction, and should not ordinarily be construed as mandatory; it is subservient to substantive justice.

42 Hertz Software India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
139 Taxmann.com 448 · 2022 · ITAT
62
citing judgments

The claim for Foreign Tax Credit cannot be denied solely due to a delay in filing Form-67, as the requirement for filing Form-67 under Rule 128(9) is considered directory and not mandatory. The provisions of a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) prevail over the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy v. PCIT
460 ITR 615 · 2024 · High Court
50
citing judgments

An assessee's claim for Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) cannot be rejected merely because Form 67 was filed after the due date under section 139(1), provided it is filed before the completion of assessment proceedings.

Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT
142 Taxmann.com 414 · 2022 · ITAT
37
citing judgments

The requirement to file Form 67 by the due date for claiming foreign tax credit is directory, not mandatory, if filed before the completion of assessment proceedings.

Judgments citing foreign tax credit

Culver Max Entertinment Private Limited (Formerly Known As Sony Pictures Network India Private Limited Erstwhile Multi Screen Media Private Limited, Mumbai vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax-Circle 16(9), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statisti...

ITA 3360/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2018-19 Culver Max Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., The Cit(A), Nfac, The Asst. Cit, (Formerly Known As Sony Pictures Circle 16(9), Room 439, 4Th Floor, Vs. Networks India Pvt. Ltd.), Aayakar Bhavan, Maharishi Karve Interface Building 7, 4Th Floor, Off Road, Malad Link Road, Malad (W), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400064 Pan No. Aabcs 1728 D Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Nitesh Joshi &For Respondent: 22/08/2024
Section 37Section 40Section 90

deduction under section 37 of the Act relating to deduction under section 37 of the Act in respect of taxes paid outside India (foreign tax credit) for which relief in respect of taxes paid outside India (foreign tax credit) for which relief in respect of taxes paid outside India (foreign ... counsel further submitted that regarding the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. counsel further submitted that regarding the claim of foreign tax credit claim of foreign tax credit, the assessee has a the assessee has already filed rectification application before the Ld. CIT(A) rectification application before

Sanjeev Mehta, New Delhi vs. ACIT Circle-70(1), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 353/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma, Judicialmember Sa No.49/Del./2024 (In Ita No.353/Del/2024) (Assessment Year : 2019-20) & Sanjeev Mehta Vs. Acit, Circle 70(1), G-1, Vishwa Apartment, New Delhi. 3, Shankaracharya Marg, Civil Lines, New Delhi – 110 054. (Pan: Aaapm5622L) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Adv. Revenue By : Shri Anuj Garg, Sr. Dr. Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Order : 13.09.2024 O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman, Am : This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (For Short ‘Ld. Cit (A)’)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Dated 20.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2 Since We Have Disposed Off The Appeal In The Instant Case By This Order, The Stay Application Filed By The Assessee Has Become Infructuous, Hence Dismissed.

For Appellant: Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anuj Garg, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 253(5)Section 5

That the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC has erred in law in confirming the order of the AO and not granting the relief of foreign tax credit to the assessee of Rs. 14,91,833/- on the income of Rs. 65.81 lakhs earned outside India and offered to tax in India ... taxed in one of the Contracting States. 07. That the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC has failed to consider the fact that before disallowing foreign tax credit claimed by the assessee, the CPC Bengaluru in their intimation issued u/s 143(1) of the Act, have not given any opportunity

Income Tax Officer, Chennai vs. Sysarc Informatix Pvt.Ltd, Chennai

In the result, The appeal stand allowed’’

ITA 1213/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1213/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-2018) The Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Sysarc Informatix Private Limited, Corporate Ward 6(3) New No.13, Old No.195, Chennai. Defence Officers Colony, Nandambakkam, Chennai 600 032. [Pan : Aaecs 6891A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. Anitha, Irs, Addl. Cit. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. S. Subashini, C.A. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.09.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri ()

For Appellant: Ms. Anitha, IRS, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Ms. S. Subashini, C.A
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 90

NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 22-12-2023 in the matter of assessment order u/s 143(3) passed on 20-12-2019 denying Foreign Tax Credit of Rs.63,43,287/- as claimed by the assessee u/s 90/91 of the Act. The same was denied for delay in filing of requisite ... filed (uploaded) by the assessee on 12.12.2017 after extended due date and lay claim on the credit. AO denied the claim of Foreign Tax Credit for the reason that the assessee company has failed to submit the Form 67 within the due date prescribed

Sanjay Ajit, Coimbatore vs. Income Tax Officer, International Taxation, Coimbatore

The appeal stands partly allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 1317/CHNY/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1317/Chny/2023 (िनधा*रणवष* / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Shri Sanjay Ajit Ito बनाम/ Flat No.69, Sri Vari Gardens, International Taxation Ward, Vkk Menon Road, New Sidhapusur, Coimbatore. Vs. Coimbatore South-641 044. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Fcgps-0088-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri G.C.Srivasatava (Advocate)(Virtual) - Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Samuel Pitta (Jcit) -Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 22-08-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-09-2024 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri G.C.Srivasatava (Advocate)(Virtual) -For Respondent: Dr. Samuel Pitta (JCIT) -Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 15Section 234DSection 270ASection 5(2)Section 5(2)(a)Section 9(1)(ii)Section 90

No.2911/Mds/2016 dated 05.08.2016) was held to be factually distinguished on the ground that in that case the assessee was claiming foreign tax credit relief for taxes paid on doubly taxed income which was not the case in that appeal. In para-7, the bench found the issue to be covered

Arijit Mitra, Pune vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-12, Pune

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 211/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Aug 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.211/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22 Arijit Mitra, Vs. Dcit, Circle-12, Pune. Flat No.T-25-1212, Metro Tower, Sadesatranali Road, Amonora Park Town, Hadapsar, Pune- 411028. Pan : Anepm2834P Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sanket M. Joshi Revenue By Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde : Date Of Hearing : 27.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.08.2024 आदेश / Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm: This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2021-22 Arises Against The National Faceless Appeal Centre [In Short The “Nfac”] Delhi’S Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1058890068(1), Dated 19.12.2023, In Proceedings U/S 154 & Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). Heard Both The Parties At Length. Case File Perused.

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M. Joshi
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154

assessee pleads the following impugned grounds in the instant appeal :- “1. The Ld CIT (Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of the foreign tax credit towards tax withheld in USA of Rs.8,61,822/- though Ld CIT(Appeals) had admitted the fact that the Ld AO at CPC has disallowed ... foreign tax credit without providing specific for disallowing the foreign tax credit reasons in the intimation u/s 143(1) as well as u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Ld CIT (Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of the foreign tax credit towards tax withheld

Anjappan Rangasmy, Chennai vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Chennai

Appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 321/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.301/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.302 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.303/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.304 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.305/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 6. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.306 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 7. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.307 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 8. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.316/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 9. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.317/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R.Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. Sr.DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 24Section 54Section 80CSection 90A

Disallowance of interest on borrowings; (ii) Deduction of interest on housing loan; (iii) Deduction u/s 80C; (iv) Claim of deduction u/s 54; (v) Foreign Tax Credit. 1.3 The Ld. AR advanced arguments by taking support of various documents as placed on record. The issue-wise chart, for all the years ... corresponding grounds of appeal, for AYs 2014-15 to 2019-20 stands allowed to that extent. 7. We find that the issue of foreign tax credit is covered in assessee’s favor by the decision of this Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Smt. Chengam Durga (ITA No.1491/Chny/2023 dated

Anjappan Rangasamy, Chennai vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Chennai

Appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 320/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.301/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.302 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.303/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.304 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.305/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 6. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.306 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 7. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.307 /Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 8. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.316/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 9. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.317/Chny/2024 (िनधा(रणवष( / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R.Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. Sr.DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 24Section 54Section 80CSection 90A

Disallowance of interest on borrowings; (ii) Deduction of interest on housing loan; (iii) Deduction u/s 80C; (iv) Claim of deduction u/s 54; (v) Foreign Tax Credit. 1.3 The Ld. AR advanced arguments by taking support of various documents as placed on record. The issue-wise chart, for all the years ... corresponding grounds of appeal, for AYs 2014-15 to 2019-20 stands allowed to that extent. 7. We find that the issue of foreign tax credit is covered in assessee’s favor by the decision of this Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Smt. Chengam Durga (ITA No.1491/Chny/2023 dated