← All Phrases

“Section 80(2)(d)”

Section References (mined)Section 80Section 80(2)(d)105 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 80(2)(d) is Areva T & D India Ltd. v. DCIT (20 Taxmann.com 29), cited in 34 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 80(2)(d)

Areva T & D India Ltd. v. DCIT

20 Taxmann.com 29 · 2012 · High Court

citing judgments

Specified intangible assets like business claims, information, records, contracts, employees, and know-how acquired under a slump sale are considered 'business or commercial rights' eligible for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii).

100 ITD 173. (g) M/s. Balaram Manmani v. Asstt. CIT (Lucknow)

7 SOT 164 · 2006 · ITAT

citing judgments

Section 115JB(1) of the Income Tax Act, read with Explanation 1(i), governs the computation of book profits for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) purposes.

Judgments citing Section 80(2)(d)

Shivagiri Co-Op Credit Society Ltd, Belagavi vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(3), Belagavi

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 138/PAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

judicial decisions were the co-operative society receives/earns interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, we fallow the judicial precedence, and set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the disputed issue

Shree Mahila Credit Souhard Sahakari Sangh Niyamit, Belagavi vs. ITO Ward 1 Belagavi, Belagavi

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 117/PAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

judicial decisions were the co-operative society receives/earns interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, we fallow the judicial precedence, and set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the disputed issue

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 161/PAN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

judicial decisions were the co-operative society receives/earns interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, we fallow the judicial precedence, and set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the disputed issue

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 160/PAN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

judicial decisions were the co-operative society receives/earns interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, we fallow the judicial precedence, and set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the disputed issue

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 159/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

judicial decisions were the co-operative society receives/earns interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, we fallow the judicial precedence, and set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the disputed issue

Akshaya Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Karwar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(1), Karwar

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 158/PAN/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

judicial decisions were the co-operative society receives/earns interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, we fallow the judicial precedence, and set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the disputed issue

Calicut City Service Co Operative Bank Ltd, Calicut vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kozhikode

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 756/COCH/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2023-24 Calicut City Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant 19/1180-B, City Bank Building Challappuram, Kozhikode 673002 [Pan: Aabac7863M] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Kozhikode ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Parvathy Ammal, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 07.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri Parvathy Ammal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 80(2)(d)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(i)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM

ACIT Cirlce-1, Lucknow vs. U P Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited, Lucknow

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 371/LKW/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Agarwal, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Shyam Lal, CA

Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI ANADEE NATH

The Byculla Market Co Operative Society Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO, Ward 20(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the orders of the lower authorities are reversed and the learned AO is directed to grant deduction to the assessee on interest income earned from cooperative banks u/s 80 P (2) (d) o...

ITA 237/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Kumar Kale, Ld. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Ld. Sr. A.R

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 250Section 80Section 80(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(d)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI OMKARESHWAR

Income Tax Officer, Wanaparthy Block vs. Tamilnadu Special Police Employees Cooperative, Tsp Camp

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 363/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:363/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Income Tax Officer, Tamilnadu Special Police Non-Corporate Ward -7(3), Vs. Employees Cooperative, Chennai – 600 034. Avadi, Chennai – 600 054. [Pan:Aafat-0366-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.T. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Reddi Prakash, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.07.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha, Am: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Filed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, For The Assessment Year 2020-21, Dated 11.10.2024. 2. At The Outset, We Find That There Is A Delay Of 34 Days In Appeal Filed By The Revenue, For Which Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With Reasons For Delay Has Been Filed. After Considering The Petition Filed By The Revenue & Also Hearing Both The Parties, We Find That There Is A Reasonable Cause For The Revenue In Not Filing Appeal On Or Before The Due Date Prescribed Under The Law & Thus

For Appellant: Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.TFor Respondent: Shri. G. Reddi Prakash, C.A

Section 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी जॉज" जॉज" के, उपा

Baroda District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Limited, Vadodara, Gujarat vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Officer, Circle 1(1)(1), Vadodara, Gujarat

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for Asst

ITA 416/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble

Section 14Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(iv)

section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The ld.AO shall work out net amount of such interest income, and thereafter grant deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act.” 3. The ld.counsel for the assessee contended that the Tribunal has directed the AO to compute net interest income from

Jagruti Co Op Hsg Soc Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO Ward (197)(6), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 372/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Jagruti Co Op Hsg Soc Ito Ward –(197)(6) Ltd. Cpc Bangaluru, L.J. Road Mahim, Vs. 560500. Mumbai-400016. Pan: Aaaat9842L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Pratik Jain, Ld. A.R. Revenue By : Shri Kavan Limbasiya, Ld. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 12.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.06.2025 O R D E R Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry: This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 19.11.2024, Impugned Herein, Passed By The Addl/Jcit (A) (In Short Ld. Addl/Joint Commissioner) U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) For The A.Y. 2014-15. 2. In This Case, The Intimation/Order U/S. 143(1) Of The Act Was Issued On Dated 20.05.2015 By The Ito Ward-(197) (6) Mumbai, Whereby The Deduction Claimed By The Assessee U/S. 80(2)(D) Of The Act Amounting To Rs. 7,36,459/- Earned On Its Investment & Saving Bank Account Maintained With Saraswat Co-Operative Bank & The Nkgsb Co-Operative Bank Was Disallowed. The Assessee Against The Said Intimation Dated 20.05.2015 Filed A Rectification Application U/S. 154 Of The Act, However, No Order For Rectification Has Ever Been Passed By The Cpc. The Assessee On Realizing Its 2 M/S. Jagruti Co Op Hsg Soc Ltd. Mistake Challenged The Said Intimation U/S. 143(1) Dated 25.05.2025 By Filing First Appeal On Dated 12.06.2024 But With The Delay Of More Than 9 Years. The Ld. Addl/Joint Commissioner By Considering The Peculiar Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Ultimately Declined To Entertain The Request For Condonation Of Delay & Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee In Limine Without Making Any Discussion On Merit Or On Any Other Aspect.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Jain, Ld. A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kavan Limbasiya, Ld. D.R

Section 14Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 80(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(d)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014

Sagar Tech Plaza A Premises Co-Op Society Ltd, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Department, Bandra Mumbai

In the result, the Assessee’s appeals are allowed

ITA 2687/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2019-20 & Assessment Year: 2022-23

For Appellant: Shri Virat Doshi, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Kavan Limbasiya, Ld. Sr.D.R

Section 2(19)Section 250Section 80(2)(d)Section 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2019

Sagar Tech Plaza A Premises Co Op Society Ltd, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Department, Bandra Mumbai

In the result, the Assessee’s appeals are allowed

ITA 2686/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2019-20 & Assessment Year: 2022-23

For Appellant: Shri Virat Doshi, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Kavan Limbasiya, Ld. Sr.D.R

Section 2(19)Section 250Section 80(2)(d)Section 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2019

The Kundara Panchayath Service Cooperative Bank Ltd, Kollam vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Kollam

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 805/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri G.Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 250Section 80PSection 8O

opinion that the interest income earned from Kollam District Co-operative bank in the facts and circumstances of the case do come within section 80(2)(d) of the Act. 8. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th

The Kundara Panchayath Service Cooperative Bank Ltd, Kollam vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4, Kollam

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 803/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri G.Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 250Section 80PSection 8O

opinion that the interest income earned from Kollam District Co-operative bank in the facts and circumstances of the case do come within section 80(2)(d) of the Act. 8. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th

The Kundara Panchayath Service Cooperative Bank Ltd, Kollam vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4, Kollam

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 802/COCH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri G.Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 250Section 80PSection 8O

opinion that the interest income earned from Kollam District Co-operative bank in the facts and circumstances of the case do come within section 80(2)(d) of the Act. 8. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th

Shree Siddheshwar Co-Op Credit Society Limited, Belagavi vs. Assessing Officer, National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the appeal is allowed

ITA 302/PAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji07 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A. Nos. 302/Pan/2024 (A.Y. 2017-18 ) Shree Siddheshwar Co-Op Vs Ito-Ward-6, Civil Hospital Road, Credit Society Limited, . Belagavi-590001. P B Road, Kakati, Karnataka. Belgaum-591113, Karnataka. . Pan .No. Aaifs6553Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By Shri.Santosh Kumar Dlatthe.Ar Revenue By Shri.Manikandan.S.Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 06.03.2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 07.03.2025 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assesse Against The Order Of Nfac/Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 143(3) & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. 2. At The Time Of Hearing, The Ld.Ar Of The Assessee Submitted That There Is A Delay In Filing The Appeal Before The Hon’Ble Tribunal & The Assesse Has Filed The Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay. Whereas, The Facts Mentioned In The Affidavit Are Reasonable & The Ld. Dr Has No Specific Objections. Accordingly, We Condone The Delay & 2 Ita. No..302/Pan/2024 Shri Siddeswar Co-Op Society Limited.. Admit The Appeal. The Assessee Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Order Of The Cit(A) Sustaining The Denial Of Claim Of Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(D) Of The Act.

Section 143(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

judicial decisions were the co- operative society receives/earns interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under section 80(2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, we fallow the judicial precedence, and set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the disputed issue

Jay Milind Co Op Housing Society Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO Ward 22(1)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the orders of the lower authorities are reversed and the learned AO is directed to grant deduction to the assessee on interest income earned from cooperative banks u/s 80 P (2) (d) o...

ITA 323/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosainjay Milind Co-Op Housing Vs. Ito, Ward – 22(1)(4) Society Ltd., Piramal Chambers, Plot No. 454, Jay Milind Lalbaug, Parel Mumbai Chs, 15Th Road, Khar (W) – 400012. 400 052. Pan/Gir No. Aaaaj4025F (Applicant) (Respondent)

Section 2Section 250Section 80Section 80(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI BR BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Asian Paints Employees Cooperative Credit Society Limited, Mumbai vs. Assiatant Commissioner Ofincome Tax Ward 41(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the orders of the lower authorities are reversed and the learned AO is directed to grant deduction to the assessee on interest income earned from cooperative banks u/s 80 P (2) (d) o...

ITA 300/MUM/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri B R Baskaran, () & Shri Sandeep Gosain, ()

Section 2Section 234ASection 250Section 80Section 80(2)(d)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B R BASKARAN, (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, (JUDICIAL