← All Phrases

“Section 249(4)(a)”

Section References (mined)Section 249Section 249(4)(a)74 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 249(4)(a) is Pr. CIT v. Golden Peace Hotels and Resorts (P) Ltd. (124 Taxmann.com 249), cited in 105 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 249(4)(a)

Pr. CIT v. Golden Peace Hotels and Resorts (P) Ltd.
124 Taxmann.com 249 · 2021 · Supreme Court
105
citing judgments

A penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) is not sustainable if the notice issued under Section 274 fails to specifically mention whether the charge relates to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessing Officer must specify the exact charge for the penalty to be valid.

Trust (249 ITR 533) (Bom.) 3. CIT vs. Red Rose School (163 Taxman 19 (All.) 4. DIT(E) v. Alarippu (
172 ITR 698 · 1988 · High Court
61
citing judgments

Income received by a trust from sources like extra fees can be taxed at the maximum marginal rate, while other income remains eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.

11th June, 1996. 4. In Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam’s Supplemental Family Trust v. CIT
242 ITR 381 · 2000 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act cannot be initiated unless the assessment proceedings based on a previously filed return have been terminated. Notice for reassessment cannot be issued while original assessment proceedings are pending.

ITO v. Seth Bros. (SC)
74 ITR 836 · 1969 · Reported
24
citing judgments

Evidence collected during an illegal search can still be used against the assessee. An assessment made based on such evidence is valid.

CIT v. Ashoka Engineering Co.
194 ITR 645 · 1992 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

The right of appeal is conferred by statute and should be interpreted liberally and practically. Whether a right to appeal is available should be guided by the form, not the substance, of the order.

Hotel Sai Siddi (P) Ltd. v. DCIT
13 Taxmann.com 155 · 2011 · Reported
14
citing judgments

An assessee's appeal should be admitted if they incurred a loss and were therefore not liable to pay advance tax as required by section 249(4)(b). In such cases, the appeal should be decided on its merits by the CIT(A).

Komalakshi v. Dy. CIT
292 ITR 99 · 2007 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Admission of an appeal before the CIT(A) is subject to the mandatory condition of payment of tax due on the income returned by the assessee.

Vishnusharan Chandravanshi v. ITO
161 Taxmann.com 803 · 2024 · Reported
13
citing judgments

An assessee is not obligated to compute and pay advance tax under sections 208 and 209 if they have no taxable income. Consequently, an appeal should not be dismissed for non-payment of advance tax in such circumstances.

Judgments citing Section 249(4)(a)

Mohammed Abdus Sattar, Hyderabad vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, all these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 428/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 423 To 425/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Farida Banu, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Afqpb6398R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent आ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 426 To 429/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Mohammad Abdus Sattar, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Aprps9709Q अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 31 /07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 31/07/2024

For Appellant: Shri P. MuraliFor Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 132BSection 149Section 249Section 249(4)(a)

appeal filed by the assessees are not liable to be admitted for non-payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). Learned AR cited the decision of a coordinate Bench of this Tribunal ... filed by the assessee’s are not liable to be admitted for non- payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249 (4) (a) of the Act. To this fact situation, the decision of the coordinate Bench in the case of Heena Kauser (supra) is applicable

Mohammed Abdus Sattar, Hyderabad vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, all these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 427/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 423 To 425/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Farida Banu, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Afqpb6398R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent आ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 426 To 429/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Mohammad Abdus Sattar, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Aprps9709Q अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 31 /07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 31/07/2024

For Appellant: Shri P. MuraliFor Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 132BSection 149Section 249Section 249(4)(a)

appeal filed by the assessees are not liable to be admitted for non-payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). Learned AR cited the decision of a coordinate Bench of this Tribunal ... filed by the assessee’s are not liable to be admitted for non- payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249 (4) (a) of the Act. To this fact situation, the decision of the coordinate Bench in the case of Heena Kauser (supra) is applicable

Mohammed Abdus Sattar, Hyderabad vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, all these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 426/HYD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 423 To 425/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Farida Banu, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Afqpb6398R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent आ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 426 To 429/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Mohammad Abdus Sattar, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Aprps9709Q अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 31 /07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 31/07/2024

For Appellant: Shri P. MuraliFor Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 132BSection 149Section 249Section 249(4)(a)

appeal filed by the assessees are not liable to be admitted for non-payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). Learned AR cited the decision of a coordinate Bench of this Tribunal ... filed by the assessee’s are not liable to be admitted for non- payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249 (4) (a) of the Act. To this fact situation, the decision of the coordinate Bench in the case of Heena Kauser (supra) is applicable

Farida Banu, Hyderabad vs. ACIT, Center Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, all these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 425/HYD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 423 To 425/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Farida Banu, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Afqpb6398R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent आ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 426 To 429/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Mohammad Abdus Sattar, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Aprps9709Q अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 31 /07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 31/07/2024

For Appellant: Shri P. MuraliFor Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 132BSection 149Section 249Section 249(4)(a)

appeal filed by the assessees are not liable to be admitted for non-payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). Learned AR cited the decision of a coordinate Bench of this Tribunal ... filed by the assessee’s are not liable to be admitted for non- payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249 (4) (a) of the Act. To this fact situation, the decision of the coordinate Bench in the case of Heena Kauser (supra) is applicable

Farida Banu, Hyderabad vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, all these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 424/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 423 To 425/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Farida Banu, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Afqpb6398R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent आ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 426 To 429/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Mohammad Abdus Sattar, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Aprps9709Q अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 31 /07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 31/07/2024

For Appellant: Shri P. MuraliFor Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 132BSection 149Section 249Section 249(4)(a)

appeal filed by the assessees are not liable to be admitted for non-payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). Learned AR cited the decision of a coordinate Bench of this Tribunal ... filed by the assessee’s are not liable to be admitted for non- payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249 (4) (a) of the Act. To this fact situation, the decision of the coordinate Bench in the case of Heena Kauser (supra) is applicable

Farida Banu, Hyderabad vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, all these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 423/HYD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 423 To 425/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Farida Banu, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Afqpb6398R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent आ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 426 To 429/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2019-20) Mohammad Abdus Sattar, Acit, Central C/O: P Murali & Co, Chartered Accountants, 6 – Vs. Circle-2 (3), 3 – 655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082. Hyderabad [Pan :Aprps9709Q अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 31 /07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 31/07/2024

For Appellant: Shri P. MuraliFor Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 132BSection 149Section 249Section 249(4)(a)

appeal filed by the assessees are not liable to be admitted for non-payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). Learned AR cited the decision of a coordinate Bench of this Tribunal ... filed by the assessee’s are not liable to be admitted for non- payment of admitted tax as per the provisions contained in section 249 (4) (a) of the Act. To this fact situation, the decision of the coordinate Bench in the case of Heena Kauser (supra) is applicable

Mr. Muppuri Damodar, Bengaluru vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(2)(5), Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of the above observations

ITA 1231/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeymuppuri Damodar The Income Tax Officer #26/1, 7Th Main, Sb Colony Ward - 7(2)(5) Bsk Iii Stage, 7Th Block Vs. Bengaluru Bengaluru 560085 Pan – Ahppd9356E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, Advocate Revenue By: Shri Ganesh R. Gale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing: 25.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.07.2024 O R D E R Per: Keshav Dubey, J.M. This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 09.02.2024 Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2003-24/1060723928(1) Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) In Respect Of Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Orders Of The Authorities Below In So Far As They Are Against The Appellant Are Opposed To Law, Equity, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.. 2. The Learned Cit[A] Is Not Justified In Dismissing The Appeal As Not- Admitted On The Ground That The Applicable Advance Tax Has Not Been Paid By The Appellant Before The Filing Of The Present Appeal Under The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Appellant'S Case.

For Appellant: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Gale, Standing Counsel
Section 148Section 149Section 234ASection 249Section 250Section 69A

file any return of income and that the appellant was also not liable to pay any advance-tax and therefore, the provisions of section 249[4][b] was not attracted under the facts and in the circumstances of the appellant's case. 3. The order of re-assessment ... case within the meaning of Clause (b) of sub-section (4) of Section 249 of the Act. For the sake of clarity, Section 249(4) of the Act is culled out as under: "(4) No appeal under this Chapter shall be admitted unless at the time of filing

Visveswaraya Resham Khadi Industrial Association, Chikkaballapura vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Chikaballapura

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 361/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Visveswaraya Resham Khadi Industrial Association, Near Eswara Temple, The Income Tax Jangamakote Town, Officer, Post: Jangamakote Ward – 4(1), Shidlaghatta (Tq), Chikaballapur. Vs. Chikkaballapura Dist., Karnataka – 562 144. Pan: Aabav2671C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri H. Guruswamy, Itp : Shri Narendra Kumar Naik, Revenue By Addl. Cit –Dr Date Of Hearing : 29-04-2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 31-05-2024 Order Per Beena Pillaithe Present Appeal Arises Out Of Order Dated 02/02/2024, Passed By Nfac, Delhi For Assessment Year 2018-19 Is On The Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

For Appellant: Shri H. Guruswamy, ITP
Section 144Section 148Section 249(4)Section 249(4)(b)Section 250Section 69A

payable. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that the assessee has not filed an application as per proviso to Section 249(4) seeking exemption from 5. operation of section 249(4)(b) without 1,27,39,161/- appreciating the fact that the question of filing the application ... Ld.AO the assessee filed appeal before the Ld.CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee by invoking the provisions of section 249(4) of the Act. The relevant finding of the CIT(A) reads as follows: “3. Decision: As per the provisions of the section 249(4