“Section 2(84)”
The decision most relied on for Section 2(84) is Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT (113 ITR 84), cited in 245 judgments on BharatTax.
Leading authorities on Section 2(84)
The expression "attributable to" is wider in scope and import than the expression "derived from" when interpreting provisions related to profits and gains from a business or industrial undertaking. The legislature's deliberate use of these distinct phrases indicates a nuanced intent regarding the directness of the nexus between income and the source.
The assessed income can be lower than the returned income. Authorities are required to assist assessees in correcting over-assessments, even if it means reducing the income below the returned figure.
The assessment can apply the peak credit theory for additions related to unexplained credits or entries. Furthermore, assessment proceedings are not vitiated merely because the Department proceeded under an incorrect section if material existed to justify the assessment under a proper provision like section 148.
An 'undertaking' is distinct from the 'legal entity' that owns it, meaning tax benefits related to an undertaking must be assessed on a per-undertaking basis, not for the company in general, especially when a company operates multiple undertakings.
The nature and character of a receipt, whether it is of a capital or revenue nature, depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, particularly the purpose for which the payment was made.