← All Phrases

“Section 117(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 117Section 117(1)7 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 117(1) is Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. CIT (381 ITR 117), cited in 220 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 117(1)

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. CIT
381 ITR 117 · 2016 · High Court
220
citing judgments

The Bright Line Test (BLT) is not a recognized method under the Income-tax Act and Rules for benchmarking advertising, marketing, and promotion (AMP) expenses or for determining the existence of an international transaction or its Arm's Length Price. The Revenue must first establish the existence and price of an international transaction before seeking an ALP adjustment.

PCIT v. Lark Chemicals (P) Ltd.
195 Taxmann 117 · 2010 · High Court
162
citing judgments

Once an assessment is validly reopened under Section 147 for a specific item of income, the Assessing Officer cannot proceed to assess other, distinct items of income if the original ground for reopening itself fails. Explanation 3 to Section 147 does not empower the Assessing Officer to assess new items of income discovered during proceedings where the primary ground for reopening is ultimately not established.

Sambhaji and Others v. Gangabai and Others
17 SCC 117 · 2008 · Supreme Court
87
citing judgments

Procedural law serves as an aid to justice, not an obstruction, and should not ordinarily be construed as mandatory; it is subservient to substantive justice.

Abdul Hamid v. ITO
117 Taxmann.com 986 · 2020 · High Court
41
citing judgments

Section 115BBE does not apply to genuine business receipts, business turnover, or 'on-money' from sales, which should be assessed under normal provisions allowing for loss set-off; furthermore, there is no concept of "partial application of mind" by the Assessing Officer in an assessment.

Kartik Vijaysinh Sonavano v. DCIT
132 Taxmann.com 293 · 2021 · High Court
33
citing judgments

The tax department cannot speculate to deny the benefit of tax deducted at source by the employer to the petitioner.

1. Kuber Tobacco Products v. DCIT
117 ITD 273 · 2009 · ITAT
25
citing judgments

Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act, introduced by the Finance Act, 2008, has prospective effect and does not apply retrospectively.

1. Laxmi Narayan v. CIT
402 ITR 117 · 2018 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Exemption under section 54B for investment in agricultural land can be allowed even if the new property is purchased in the name of the spouse or other family members, provided the investment is made from the sale consideration of the original agricultural land.

Pr.CIT-9 v. ECity Investments
117 Taxmann.com 124 · 2020 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

Amounts advanced to a sister concern for commercial expediency are considered business expenditure, and any interest paid on loans taken for such advances is allowable as a deduction.

Judgments citing Section 117(1)