← All Phrases

“undisclosed income”

Search & SeizureSection 153ASection 153A9,092 judgments

The decision most relied on for undisclosed income is CIT v. Kabul Chawla (380 ITR 573), cited in 3,235 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on undisclosed income

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

CIT v. Simit P. Sheth
356 ITR 451 · 2013 · High Court
1,465
citing judgments

Additions for alleged bogus purchases should be restricted to the profit element, not the entire turnover. The profit element is often estimated at 12.5% of the purported bogus purchases.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Harjeev Aggarwal
290 CTR 263 · 2016 · High Court
583
citing judgments

Assessment based solely on a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act requires the statement to be relatable to incriminating material or evidence found during the search, especially when considering Section 158BB(1) which restricts computation of undisclosed income to evidence found during search.

CIT v. Anil Kumar Bhatia
352 ITR 493 · 2013 · High Court
537
citing judgments

Section 153A can be invoked to reassess income for all years under consideration prior to a search, even if returns for those years were processed under Section 143(1)(a). The Assessing Officer has the power to reassess total income in such cases without fetters.

CIT v. P. Mohanakala
291 ITR 278 · 2007 · Supreme Court
525
citing judgments

The Supreme Court emphasized that in the absence of concrete rebuttal by the assessee, circumstantial evidence holds significant weight, applying the doctrine of preponderance of probability, particularly when assessing undisclosed income or unexplained cash credits.

Society v. UOI
394 ITR 220 · 2017 · Supreme Court
493
citing judgments

Uncorroborated loose papers or documents found during a search operation have no evidentiary value and cannot be the sole basis for determining undisclosed income. Additions based on such material require independent evidence to establish trustworthiness and a direct link to the assessee.

CIT v. President Industries
258 ITR 654 · 2002 · High Court
471
citing judgments

When books of account are rejected and unaccounted sales or receipts are discovered, the income addition is restricted to the net profit element embedded in these undisclosed transactions, not the entire sale proceeds or receipts, especially if corresponding purchases are not proven to be outside the books.

CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa
386 ITR 483 · 2016 · High Court
416
citing judgments

If no incriminating material is found during a search operation regarding a particular issue, then no addition can be made concerning that issue in an assessment under section 153A of the Income-tax Act.

Judgments citing undisclosed income

M/S. Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5179/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3989/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 3990/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5179/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 3991/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 3992/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 M/S Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, Rajiv Saxena & Co. Adv. & Solictors, Central Circle-1, H.O. 318-D, Mayur Vihar, Phase-Ii, New Delhi New Delhi-110091 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca4321K Assessee By : Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. & Sh. Shyam Sunder, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 145Section 153Section 153A

various years that are under appeal before us. The said bogus sales have been treated as undisclosed income in the hands of Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. wherein the additions stands deleted. 7. During the hearing, it has been specifically argued by the ld. AR that the addition has been made bereft ... assessment under section 153A only on the basis of some incriminating material unearthed during the course of search or requisition of documents or undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment

M/S. Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3992/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3989/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 3990/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5179/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 3991/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 3992/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 M/S Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, Rajiv Saxena & Co. Adv. & Solictors, Central Circle-1, H.O. 318-D, Mayur Vihar, Phase-Ii, New Delhi New Delhi-110091 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca4321K Assessee By : Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. & Sh. Shyam Sunder, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 145Section 153Section 153A

various years that are under appeal before us. The said bogus sales have been treated as undisclosed income in the hands of Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. wherein the additions stands deleted. 7. During the hearing, it has been specifically argued by the ld. AR that the addition has been made bereft ... assessment under section 153A only on the basis of some incriminating material unearthed during the course of search or requisition of documents or undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment

M/S. Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3991/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3989/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 3990/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5179/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 3991/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 3992/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 M/S Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, Rajiv Saxena & Co. Adv. & Solictors, Central Circle-1, H.O. 318-D, Mayur Vihar, Phase-Ii, New Delhi New Delhi-110091 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca4321K Assessee By : Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. & Sh. Shyam Sunder, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 145Section 153Section 153A

various years that are under appeal before us. The said bogus sales have been treated as undisclosed income in the hands of Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. wherein the additions stands deleted. 7. During the hearing, it has been specifically argued by the ld. AR that the addition has been made bereft ... assessment under section 153A only on the basis of some incriminating material unearthed during the course of search or requisition of documents or undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment

M/S. Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3990/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3989/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 3990/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5179/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 3991/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 3992/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 M/S Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, Rajiv Saxena & Co. Adv. & Solictors, Central Circle-1, H.O. 318-D, Mayur Vihar, Phase-Ii, New Delhi New Delhi-110091 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca4321K Assessee By : Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. & Sh. Shyam Sunder, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 145Section 153Section 153A

various years that are under appeal before us. The said bogus sales have been treated as undisclosed income in the hands of Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. wherein the additions stands deleted. 7. During the hearing, it has been specifically argued by the ld. AR that the addition has been made bereft ... assessment under section 153A only on the basis of some incriminating material unearthed during the course of search or requisition of documents or undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment

M/S. Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3989/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3989/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 3990/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5179/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 3991/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 3992/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 M/S Allied Perfumers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, Rajiv Saxena & Co. Adv. & Solictors, Central Circle-1, H.O. 318-D, Mayur Vihar, Phase-Ii, New Delhi New Delhi-110091 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca4321K Assessee By : Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. & Sh. Shyam Sunder, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Saxena, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 145Section 153Section 153A

various years that are under appeal before us. The said bogus sales have been treated as undisclosed income in the hands of Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. wherein the additions stands deleted. 7. During the hearing, it has been specifically argued by the ld. AR that the addition has been made bereft ... assessment under section 153A only on the basis of some incriminating material unearthed during the course of search or requisition of documents or undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment