← All Phrases

“incriminating material”

Search & SeizureSection 153ASection 153A8,981 judgments

The decision most relied on for incriminating material is CIT v. Kabul Chawla (380 ITR 573), cited in 3,235 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on incriminating material

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.
149 Taxmann.com 399 · 2023 · Supreme Court
2,379
citing judgments

An assessment under section 153A is without jurisdiction if there is an absence of incriminating material for an unabated assessment year.

CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society
397 ITR 344 · 2017 · Supreme Court
1,589
citing judgments

For assessments under Section 153C, a notice is legally unsustainable if there is no incriminating material correlated to the specific assessment years for which reassessment is sought.

Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia
395 ITR 526 · 2017 · High Court
1,226
citing judgments

In search assessments under Section 153A, additions to income are permissible only if incriminating material is found during the search; in the absence of such material, completed assessments cannot be disturbed. A statement recorded under Section 132(4) and later retracted may not, on its own, constitute sufficient incriminating evidence for making additions.

All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT
137 ITD 287 · 2012 · ITAT
907
citing judgments

In non-abated assessments, the Assessing Officer can make additions under section 153A based on books of accounts or documents found during a search but not produced during the original assessment, provided such material is incriminating.

PCIT v. Best Infrastructure (India) (P.) Ltd.
397 ITR 82 · 2017 · High Court
786
citing judgments

A statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, does not by itself constitute incriminating material for making additions to income.

CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd.
380 ITR 612 · 2016 · High Court
689
citing judgments

Completed assessments can be interfered with under Section 153A or 153C only on the basis of incriminating material unearthed during the search, necessitating a direct correlation between the discovered material and the power to assess or reopen concluded assessments.

Pr. CIT v. Saumya Constructions (P.)Ltd.
387 ITR 529 · 2016 · High Court
670
citing judgments

Assessments under Section 153A cannot be sustained without any incriminating material found during the search that substantiates the additions. This principle applies even to completed assessments where no additional income is disclosed.

Judgments citing incriminating material

Naga Lakshmi Gunuputi, Bhimavaram vs. ACIT Central Circle-2, Rajahmundry

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 56/VIZ/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.52-54/Viz/2022 & 56/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & 2018-19) Venkata Pavan Kumar Gunuputi Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of [Pan : Bsrpg1889F] Income Tax Central Circle-2 Satyanarayana Gunuputi Rajahmundry [Pan : Aftpg4842F] Naga Lakshmi Gunuputi [Pan : Afapg3496D] 19-9-3/3, Bank Colony Near Water Tank, Bhimavaram (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 28.02.2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153C

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on 02.11.2017 at the residential premises of Sri Gunuputi Lakshmayya, assessee’s father and various incriminating material was found and seized. Subsequently, notices u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A was issued to the assessee on 21.03.2019 and in response to the notices issued

Satyanarayana Gunuputi, Bhimavaram vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2, Rajahmundry

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 54/VIZ/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.52-54/Viz/2022 & 56/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & 2018-19) Venkata Pavan Kumar Gunuputi Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of [Pan : Bsrpg1889F] Income Tax Central Circle-2 Satyanarayana Gunuputi Rajahmundry [Pan : Aftpg4842F] Naga Lakshmi Gunuputi [Pan : Afapg3496D] 19-9-3/3, Bank Colony Near Water Tank, Bhimavaram (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 28.02.2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153C

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on 02.11.2017 at the residential premises of Sri Gunuputi Lakshmayya, assessee’s father and various incriminating material was found and seized. Subsequently, notices u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A was issued to the assessee on 21.03.2019 and in response to the notices issued

Satyanarayana Gunuputi, Bhimavaram vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2, Rajahmundry

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 53/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.52-54/Viz/2022 & 56/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & 2018-19) Venkata Pavan Kumar Gunuputi Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of [Pan : Bsrpg1889F] Income Tax Central Circle-2 Satyanarayana Gunuputi Rajahmundry [Pan : Aftpg4842F] Naga Lakshmi Gunuputi [Pan : Afapg3496D] 19-9-3/3, Bank Colony Near Water Tank, Bhimavaram (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 28.02.2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153C

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on 02.11.2017 at the residential premises of Sri Gunuputi Lakshmayya, assessee’s father and various incriminating material was found and seized. Subsequently, notices u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A was issued to the assessee on 21.03.2019 and in response to the notices issued

Venkata Pavan Kumar Gunuputi, Bhimavaram vs. ACIT Central Circle -2, Rajahmundary

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 52/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.52-54/Viz/2022 & 56/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & 2018-19) Venkata Pavan Kumar Gunuputi Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of [Pan : Bsrpg1889F] Income Tax Central Circle-2 Satyanarayana Gunuputi Rajahmundry [Pan : Aftpg4842F] Naga Lakshmi Gunuputi [Pan : Afapg3496D] 19-9-3/3, Bank Colony Near Water Tank, Bhimavaram (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 28.02.2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153C

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on 02.11.2017 at the residential premises of Sri Gunuputi Lakshmayya, assessee’s father and various incriminating material was found and seized. Subsequently, notices u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A was issued to the assessee on 21.03.2019 and in response to the notices issued

Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vijayawada vs. Aasistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Rajahmundry

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 140/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.139/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2014-15) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg 1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.140/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2017-18) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 127(2)(a)Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

search and seizure operation was carried out during January 2017, but during the search and seizure operations in the assessee’s premises no such incriminating material was found and hence notice issued u/s. 153A of the Act is invalid and the assessment based thereon is void-ab-initio ... seizure in the premises of the assessee. We find merit in the argument of the Ld. AR that in the absence of any incriminating material found in the premises of the assessee, notice U/s. 153A of the Act cannot be issued. In the instant case, the affidavit was found

Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vijayawada vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Rajahmundry

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 139/VIZ/2022[2041-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2041-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.139/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2014-15) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg 1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.140/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2017-18) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 127(2)(a)Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

search and seizure operation was carried out during January 2017, but during the search and seizure operations in the assessee’s premises no such incriminating material was found and hence notice issued u/s. 153A of the Act is invalid and the assessment based thereon is void-ab-initio ... seizure in the premises of the assessee. We find merit in the argument of the Ld. AR that in the absence of any incriminating material found in the premises of the assessee, notice U/s. 153A of the Act cannot be issued. In the instant case, the affidavit was found