← All Phrases

“eligible assessee”

Assessment ProceduresSection 144CSection 144C662 judgments

The decision most relied on for eligible assessee is CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd. (348 ITR 302), cited in 540 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on eligible assessee

CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.
348 ITR 302 · 2012 · Supreme Court
540
citing judgments

Goodwill, whether arising from an amalgamation or a slump sale, is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act. While the assessee must prove the existence and valuation of such goodwill, it is recognized as a depreciable asset.

Pandian Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT
262 ITR 278 · 2003 · Supreme Court
353
citing judgments

Income eligible for deduction under Section 80IA or 80IC must have a direct nexus with the eligible business activity of the industrial undertaking. Income merely incidental to the business, even if part of the assessee's overall business, is not considered "derived from" the eligible undertaking.

CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd.
391 ITR 274 · 2017 · Supreme Court
290
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 10A or 10AA of the Income-tax Act is computed on the profits of the eligible unit without first setting off losses from other units or non-eligible units. Conversely, losses incurred by an eligible unit are allowed to be set off against the assessee's other taxable business profits.

CIT v. ABG Heavy Industries Ltd.
322 ITR 323 · 2010 · High Court
229
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer cannot deny a Section 80IA deduction by merely asserting that the assessee is not a "developer" without considering the relevant agreements and facts. Entitlement to Section 80IA deduction requires a thorough examination of the assessee's role as a developer.

CIT v. Claris Lifesciences Ltd.
326 ITR 251 · 2010 · High Court
196
citing judgments

If approval from the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) for an in-house R&D centre is granted during the previous year, the assessee is entitled to claim weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) for the entire expenditure incurred during that year.

Vijay Television (P.) Ltd. v. DRP
369 ITR 113 · 2014 · High Court
140
citing judgments

Passing a final assessment order under Section 143(3) directly, without first issuing a draft assessment order under Section 144C(1) for an eligible assessee, constitutes a fundamental jurisdictional defect. This defect cannot be cured by a subsequent corrigendum, especially if issued beyond the prescribed period of limitation.

CIT v. Ramkrishna Deo
35 ITR 312 · 1959 · Supreme Court
84
citing judgments

The burden of proving that a particular income is exempt from taxation, or is not taxable, lies on the assessee. To claim an exemption or a deduction, the assessee must provide proper materials to establish eligibility.

CIT v. Kamal Wahal
351 ITR 4 · 2013 · High Court
71
citing judgments

An assessee is eligible for capital gains exemption under Sections 54 and 54F even when the new residential house is purchased in the name of their spouse, provided the investment comes from the assessee's own funds. This allows for a purposive construction of these provisions.

Judgments citing eligible assessee

Jubilant Pharmova Ltd, Noida vs. ACIT-1Moradabad New, Utter Pradesh

In the result, all two appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1970/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.1970/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 बनाम Jubilant Pharmova Ltd., Acit-1, Plot-1A, Sector-16A, District G.B. Vs. Moradabad-New, Nagar, Noida,Uttar Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aabcv0200H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5713/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Jubilant Pharmova Ltd., Dcit/Acit (Central), Bhartiagram Gajraula, Vs. Income Tax Department, Plot-1A, Sector-16A,District G.B. Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh. Nagar, Noida,Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aabcv0200H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 153Section 92C

legislative design of section 144C indicates that it is a special self contained code in itself with regard to assessment of eligible assessee and prescribes entire procedure and time line for the framework of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) to work: The provisions of this section cannot be interpreted ... draft finalization under section 144C to operate notwithstanding the general limitation in section 153. 17. A further significant facet is that it is the eligible assessee, which has option to activate or not to activate the DRP route. If objections before DRP are not filed, the statute permits expedited finalization

Escorts Kubota Limited (Escorts Kubota India Private Limited Merged With Escorts Kubota Limited), Faridabad vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad

ITA 5992/DEL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5982/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22 Mmtc-Pamp India Private Limited, 221, Ground Floor, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase-Iii, New Delhi. बनाम Dcit, Vs. Circle-16(1),C.R. Building, Indraprastha Marg, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. Pan No.Aafcm3576K अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Ms. Sherry Goyal, Adv. & Ms. Viyushti Rawat, Adv. Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No. 1994/Del/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Good Year India Ltd., Mathura Road, Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad, Faridabad, Haryana. बनाम Acit (Osd), Vs. Circle 10(1), C.R. Building, New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacg3511H अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv., Shri Ramit Katyal, Ar Shri Dhruv Seth, Adv. & Ms. Mansha Bhalla, Ar Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr Bergen Engines (India) Private Limited, बनाम आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5991/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22 2Nd Floor, 52B, Okhla Industrial Estate, Dcit, Vs. Circle-4(2), C.R. Building, Phase-Iii, New Delhi. I.P. Estate, Delhi. Pan No.Aaecb7223M अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ankit Sahni, Adv., Ms. Taranjeet Kaur, Ar & Revenue By Shri Vishal Kalra, Adv. (Virtual) Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr

Section 144C(13)

legislative design of section 144C indicates that it is a special self-contained code in itself with regard to assessment of eligible assessee and prescribes entire procedure and time line for the framework of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) to work: The provisions of this section cannot be interpreted ... draft finalization under section 144C to operate notwithstanding the general limitation in section 153. 17. A further significant facet is that it is the eligible assessee, which has option to activate or not to activate the DRP route. If objections before DRP are not filed, the statute permits expedited finalization