← All Phrases

“service of notice”

ReassessmentSection 148Section 1483,297 judgments

The decision most relied on for service of notice is Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai (84 Taxmann.com 51), cited in 263 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on service of notice

Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai
84 Taxmann.com 51 · 2017 · ITAT
263
citing judgments

A penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot be deleted merely due to technical defects in the penalty notice, such as not ticking the specific default, if the assessee understood the charges.

CIT v. Laxman Das Khandelwal
417 ITR 325 · 2019 · Supreme Court
225
citing judgments

Issuance of a notice under Section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement for completing an assessment when a return is filed, including reassessment under Section 147/143(3). The complete absence of this notice renders the assessment invalid and is not curable by Section 292BB.

1. S. S. Gadgil v. Lal & Co.
53 ITR 231 · 1964 · Supreme Court
158
citing judgments

Income-tax assessment proceedings are administrative in nature, not civil disputes or judicial proceedings between contesting parties. Income-tax authorities act as administrative bodies to estimate income and assess tax, and the proper service of notice within the limitation period is foundational for reassessment jurisdiction.

Munjal BCU Centre of Innovation and Entrepreneurship v. CIT (Exemptions)
463 ITR 560 · 2024 · High Court
75
citing judgments

Service of notice through the ITBA portal is not a valid method of service under section 282(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and Rule 127(1) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Consequently, matters where notice was deemed invalidly served via ITBA portal are remanded to the Assessing Officer for a de novo disposal to uphold principles of natural justice.

Narayana Chetty v. ITO
35 ITR 388 · 1959 · Supreme Court
73
citing judgments

A valid and properly served notice under section 148 (or old section 34) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite for initiating reassessment proceedings; its absence or invalidity renders the entire proceedings illegal and void ab initio. The validity of service hinges on adherence to prescribed modes, not merely the recipient's acknowledgment.

Mavis Satcom Ltd. v. Deputy CIT
337 ITR 389 · 2011 · High Court
68
citing judgments

The present case is cited as authority for the proposition that notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are valid even if they do not refer to the reasons recorded for initiating reassessment proceedings, provided the reasons are communicated to the assessee. Furthermore, the issue of jurisdiction under Section 124(3) and the validity of notice under Section 143(2) are also key areas addressed.

CIT v. Gitsons Engineering Co.
370 ITR 87 · 2015 · High Court
68
citing judgments

The issuance of a notice under Section 143(2) is mandatory, and its non-service or invalidity is not a curable procedural irregularity, rendering subsequent assessment proceedings void. Objections regarding non-service of notice, being a jurisdictional issue, can be raised for the first time before the Tribunal.

Banarsi Debi v. ITO
53 ITR 100 · 1964 · Supreme Court
63
citing judgments

For income-tax notices, particularly under Section 34(1) of the 1922 Act (corresponding to Sections 147/148 of the 1961 Act), there is no real distinction between the 'issue' and 'service' of a notice. The word 'issued' must be given a wider meaning, effectively encompassing 'served'.

Judgments citing service of notice

Patel Inn and Travels Private Limited, Ahmedabad vs. The Jt.CIT(OSD), Circle-3(1)(1), Now the ITO Ward-3(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 814/AHD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 814/Ahd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) िनधा"रण वष" Patel Inn & Travels The Jt.Cit(Osd) बनाम बनाम/ बनाम बनाम Circle-3(1)(1), Ahmedabad Private Limited Vs. 59, Op. Rural Police Head Quarters, B/H. S. G. Now The Ito, Ward- Highway, Makarba Road, 3(1)(1), Ahmedabad Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380054 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aadcp9068M (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Ms. Urvashi Shodhan, Ar अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri J L Bhatia, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25/07/2024 29/07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement O R D E R Per Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, (In Short ‘The Cit(A)’) Dated 22.08.2023 For The Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Original Return Of Income For A.Y. 2011-12 Was Filed By The Assessee On 30.09.2011 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.81,08,580/-. Subsequently, The Assessee Had Filed A Revised Return On 17.02.2012 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.68,93,150/-. The Assessment Was

For Respondent: Shri J L Bhatia, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(3)Section 156

available on record, is nowhere mentioned in the order under Section 154 of the Act dated 19.03.2018. Further, there is no evidence of service of notice dated 01.03.2018 available in the file. It is ironical that the notice that is mentioned in the order is not available in the file

Param Sant Dr. Basant Adhyatmic Avam Shiksha Prasar Jan Seva Prnyas, Bijnor vs. CIT(E), Lucknow

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 6257/DEL/2019[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jul 2024

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Naveen Chandraआअसं.6257/िद"ी/2019 Param Sant Dr. Basant Adhyatmic Avam Shiksha Prasar Jan Seva Prnyas, Shyam Vihar, Railway Station Chowk, Najibabad Road, Bijnor, Up 246701 Pan: Aadtp-7036-L ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Income Tax Department, 5Th Floor, South Block, T.C/46V, Upscidc Ltd., Vibhuti Khand, Lucknow 226010 अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant By : None "ितवादी"ारा/Respondent By : Shri P.N. Baranwal, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" ितिथ/ Date Of Hearing : 08/07/2024 घोषणा क" ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 25/07/2024 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow Dated 01.05.2019, Passed U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P.N. Baranwal, CIT-DR
Section 12Section 12A

mentioned in Form No. 36. As per the acknowledgements available on record, the notices sent to assessee/appellant through RPAD were duly served. Despite service of notice none appeared to represent the assessee. It seems that the assessee is not keen to pursue its appeal, therefore, this appeal is taken