Vilas Vrajlal Parekh(HUF) v. ITO, Ward-1 (3)

129 Taxmann.com 68High Court2021#6515 most cited

What is Vilas Vrajlal Parekh(HUF) v. ITO, Ward-1 (3) authority for?

Notice under Section 148 for reassessment proceedings is valid when there is no infirmity in the action of the Assessing Officer, as supported by decisions on similar facts.

17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Vilas Vrajlal Parekh HUF v. ITO · section 147 · section 148 · reassessment proceedings · validity of notice · Assessing Officer · similar set of facts

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Vilas Vrajlal Parekh(HUF) v. ITO, Ward-1 (3)

Vilas Vrajlal Parekh(HUF) v. ITO, Ward-1 (3) (129 Taxmann.com 68) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax