Vee Enterprises (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi) 6. Vedanta Ltd. (2021) 279 Taxman 358 (Born) 7 v. K. Bharathi

102 Taxmann.com 255High Court2019#18596 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Vee Enterprises (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi) 6. Vedanta Ltd. (2021) 279 Taxman 358 (Born) 7 v. K. Bharathi

Sericulturists Cum Farmers Service Co-Operative Society Limited, Bengaluru vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 425/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Sericulturists Cum Farmers Service Co-Operative Society Ltd., The Principal 01Sfcs Building, Commissioner Of Near Bus Stop, Income Tax – 2, Sarjapura Town, Bengaluru. Vs. Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru – 562 125. Pan: Aaaas6468H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Nitesh Ranjan, Ca Revenue By : Shri Praveen Karanth, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 14-09-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 26-09-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against Order Dated 30/03/2022 Passed By Ld.Pr.Cit-2, Bangalore U/S. 263 Of The Act Relating To A.Y. 2017-18 On Following Grounds Of Appeal. Tax Effect Relating To Grounds Of Appeal Each Ground Of Appeal The Order Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bengaluru-2 ("Pr. Cit") Dated 30-Mar-2022, Passed Under I. Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act,1961 ("The Act") N.A Insofar It Is Against The Appellant, Is Opposed To The Law, Weight Of Evidence, Facts & Circumstances Of The Appellant'S Case.

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Ranjan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 57Section 68Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/s. Sericulturists Cum Farmers Service Co-operative Society Ltd., The Principal 01SFCS Building, Commissioner of Near bus stop, Income Tax – 2, Sarjapura town, Bengaluru. Vs. Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru – 562 125. PAN: AAAAS6468H APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Nitesh Ranjan, CA Revenue by : Shri Praveen Karanth, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 14-09-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 26-09-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal is…

Sampkhand Group Seva Sahakari Sangh Limited, Samphkand vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hubli

ITA 366/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Sampkhand Group Seva Sahakari Sangh Ltd., The Principal No. 104, Sahakari Commissioner Of Sangh, Kumta Road, Income Tax, Janmane, Hubli. Vs. Samphkand – 581 315. Pan: Aanas3902K Appellant Respondent : Shri S.V. Ravishankar, Assessee By Advocate : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, Cit Revenue By Dr-1 Date Of Hearing : 11-08-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 23-08-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 29/03/2022 U/S. 263 Passed By The Ld.Pr.Cit, Hubli Relating To Assessment Year 2017-18 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax Hubli, Passed Under Section 263 Of The Act In So Far As It Is Against The Appellant Is Opposed To Law, Weight Of Evidence, Natural Justice, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Appellant'S Case.

For Respondent: Shri S.V. Ravishankar
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 801Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 8o

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/s. Sampkhand Group Seva Sahakari Sangh Ltd., The Principal No. 104, Sahakari Commissioner of Sangh, Kumta Road, Income Tax, Janmane, Hubli. Vs. Samphkand – 581 315. PAN: AANAS3902K APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri S.V. Ravishankar, Assessee by Advocate : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT Revenue by DR-1 Date of Hearing : 11-08-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 23-08-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by…

Vee Enterprises (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi) 6. Vedanta Ltd. (2021) 279 Taxman 358 (Born) 7 v. K. Bharathi (102 Taxmann.com 255) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax