Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v. CIT

396 ITR 371High Court2017#262 most cited
299

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,416 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v. CIT · Section 80P · 80P(2)(a) · 80P(2)(d) · 80P(4) · co-operative society deduction · income of co-operative bank · rejection of Revenue stand · assessee favorable · income-tax deduction

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v. CIT

State Bank of India Officers Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Hyderabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3), Hyderabad

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri L. P. Sahu(Through Virtual Hearing) M/S. State Bank Of India Officers Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., Hyderabad. Pan Aakas 0854M …..Appellant. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(3), Hyderabad. …..Respondent. Appellant By : Shri Shanthi Kumar (Ar) Respondent By : Shri Rohit Majumdar (D.R.) Date Of Hearing : 21.10.2021. Date Of Pronouncement : 24.11.2021. O R D E R Per Shri S.S. Godara, J.M. : This Assessee’S Appeal For Asst. Year 2014-15 Arises From The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Hyderabad’S Order Dt.8.12.2017 Passed In Case No.0366/2016-17/Ito, Ward 5(3)/Cit(A)-4/Hyd/17-18 In 2 Proceedings Under Section 143(3) Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’).

For Appellant: Shri Shanthi Kumar (AR)For Respondent: Shri Rohit Majumdar (D.R.)
Section 143(3)

…tween the parties that the same represents interest income derived from FDRs with nationalised bank. 3. There is further no quarrel between the parties that hon’ble jurisdictional high court’s decision (2017) Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. Vs. CIT (2017) 396 ITR 371 (A.P) has very much considered the Revenue’s argument placing reliance on Totgars’ Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. Vs. ITO 322 ITR 283 (SC) that such an interest income is not business income and decided it in favour of the assessee. We therefore find no merit in Revenue’s arguments supporting the CIT(A)’s detailed discussion in violation of hon’b…