Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan

263 ITR 706Supreme Court of India2003#79 most cited

What is Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan authority for?

A citizen is free to carry on business within the law, and mere tax planning without a motive to evade taxes through colorable devices is not frowned upon. The liability to taxation, for the purpose of tax treaty application, is a legal situation, not the fiscal fact of actual payment.

691

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan · section 90 · treaty benefits · tax planning · colourable devices · liability to taxation · payment of tax · Article 4 · tax treaty

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan

M/S Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt Ltd, Bangalore vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Circle-1(2), Bangalore

In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed and the assessee appeal is

ITA 130/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleit(It)A No.130/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S. Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt. Ltd., Mantri House, 41, Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore-560001 ….Appellant Pan Aafcm 1653D Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (International Transaction), Circle 1(2), Bangalore. ……Respondent. It(It)A No.384/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) (By Revenue) Assessee By: Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate. Revenue By: Shri H. Anand, Addl. Cit (D.R)

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. Anand, Addl. CIT (D.R)
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206ASection 250Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90(2)

…of undoing provisions of DTAA, besides being in violation of Article 265 of 16 IT(IT)A Nos.130 & 384/Bang/2018 Constitution of India—Assessee took plea that levy of 20% rate was unconstitutional—Held, in case of Azadi Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India, (2003) 263 ITR 706 (SC) supreme court held that provisions made in DTAAs prevail over general provisions contained in the Act to extent they were beneficial to assessee—DTAAs entered into between India and other relevant countries in present context provide for scope of taxation and/or a rate of taxation which was different from the scope/rate prescribed under the…