UCO Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B

4 SCC 599Reported decision1999#851 most cited

What is UCO Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B authority for?

Circulars and instructions issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act have the force of law and are binding on all income tax authorities. These circulars can mitigate the rigour of statutory provisions, provide administrative relief, and ensure uniform application of the Act for the benefit of the assessee.

122

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,418 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2025.

Also referred to as

UCO Bank Calcutta v CIT · Section 119 · CBDT circulars binding · instructions under Section 119 · force of law circulars · administrative relief assessee · income tax department binding · mitigation of rigour · uniform administration · assessee benefit

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing UCO Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B

Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Ratnagiri Circle, Ratnagiri vs. The Ratnagiri District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd, Ratnagiri

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 2465/PUN/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.2465/Pun/2017 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, .......अपऩलधथी / Appellant Ratnagiri Circle, Ratnagiri बनधम / V/S. The Ratnagiri District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Sahakar Bhavan Jawahar Path, Ratnagiri ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pan : Aaaar7920B Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri S. P. Walimbe

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S. P. Walimbe
Section 119Section 143(3)Section 43DSection 45Q

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “ए” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JM AND SHRI DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA No.2465/PUN/2017 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, .......अपऩलधथी / Appellant Ratnagiri Circle, Ratnagiri बनधम / V/s. The Ratnagiri District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Sahakar Bhavan Jawahar Path, Ratnagiri ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent PAN : AAAAR7920B Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri S. P. Walimbe सपनवधई की तधरऩख / Date of Hearing : 20.04.2022 घोषणध की तधरऩख / Date of Pronouncement : 27.04.2…

The Dy. CIT, Vijayawada vs. M/S. the Gandhi Co-Op., Vijayawada

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2012-

ITA 461/VIZ/2016[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Sept 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.199/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Joint Commissioner Of Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Income Tax (Osd), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.01/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.199/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Tax (Osd), Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Cross Objection No.02/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Deputy Commissioner Of Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Income Tax [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Circle-2(1), Vijayawada निर्धाऩिती की ओि से/ Assessee By : Shri C.Subrahmanyam, Ar िधजस्व की ओि से/ Revenue By : Smt U Mini Chandran, Dr सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.08.2018 05.09.2018 घोषणध की तधिीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt U Mini Chandran, DR

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम पीठ, धिशाखापटणम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM श्री िी. दुगाा राि,न्याधयक सदस्य एिं श्री धड.एस. सुन्दर ससह, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER& SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.199/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Joint Commissioner of Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Income Tax (OSD), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [PAN :AAAAT8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Comm…

The JCIT(OSD), Vijayawada vs. The Gandhi Coperative Urban Bank Ltd., Vijayawada

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2012-

ITA 199/VIZ/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Sept 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.199/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Joint Commissioner Of Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Income Tax (Osd), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.01/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.199/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Tax (Osd), Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Cross Objection No.02/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Deputy Commissioner Of Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Income Tax [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Circle-2(1), Vijayawada निर्धाऩिती की ओि से/ Assessee By : Shri C.Subrahmanyam, Ar िधजस्व की ओि से/ Revenue By : Smt U Mini Chandran, Dr सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.08.2018 05.09.2018 घोषणध की तधिीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt U Mini Chandran, DR

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम पीठ, धिशाखापटणम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM श्री िी. दुगाा राि,न्याधयक सदस्य एिं श्री धड.एस. सुन्दर ससह, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER& SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.199/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Joint Commissioner of Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Income Tax (OSD), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [PAN :AAAAT8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Comm…

ITO 20(2)(3), Mumbai vs. Network Consulting, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby ordered to be dismissed

ITA 4571/MUM/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R. C. Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.4571/Mum/2014 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) The Ito-20(2)(3), 411, बिधम/ M/S. Network Consulting Piramal Chambers, Lalbaug, 102, Osia Friendship, 51, Vs. Mumbai-400012. Gaothan Lane No.4, Andheri (W), Mumbai-400058. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aahfn2945C (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Suman Kumar (Dr) Assessee By: None सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29.08.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 16.05.2014 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -31, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2011- 12. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: - “1. The Ld Clt(A) Has Erred On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law In Allowing The Deduction U/S 10A Of The Act Amounting To Rs. 61,43,026/- Without Appreciating The Fact That As Per Clause 32 Of The Audit Report U/S 44Ab In Form No. 3Cd Submitted By The Assessee, The Auditor Has Mentioned That The Firm Is Into Service Industries & As Per Details Given By The Assessee A.Y.2011-12

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Suman Kumar (DR)
Section 10Section 10ASection 10A(1)Section 143(2)Section 1QSection 44A

…benefit of th assesses in certain specified circumstances. So long as the circular is i. force, it aids the uniform and proper administration and application of th provisions of the Act. {Refer to UCQ Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner (. Income Tax, W,8. (1999) 4 SCC 599]}." 7. by the teamed counsel for the appellant. CIT (1992) 193 ITR, 543 is misplaced one. Altogether a differed controversy was involved therein. There construction of povision granting incentive to particular income was not in issue. It wa rendered in the context of development rebate and is therefore distinguishable. 8. It is not disputed before…