U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd., Lucknow v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow-I

11 SCC 287Reported decision1997#871 most cited

What is U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd., Lucknow v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow-I authority for?

The term "members" in Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, not being defined in the Act, must be construed in the context of the specific State Cooperative Societies Act under which the cooperative society claiming exemption is formed.

120

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd. v. CIT · Section 80P · Section 80P(2)(a)(i) · definition of members · cooperative society · State Cooperative Societies Act · income tax exemption · deduction cooperative society

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd., Lucknow v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow-I

Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Palasana vs. PCIT-2, Jaipur

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 36/JPR/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 35 To 37/Jp/2021 Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2012-13 Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Cuke Pr.Cit-2, Vs. Limited, Jaipur. Village- Palsana Main Market, Palsana, Dist.- Sikar- 332402 (Raj) Pan No.: Aabap 8390 A Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 02/11/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit-2, Jaipur All Dated 31/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2010-11 To 2012-13. 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.CIT-DR)
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 35 to 37/JP/2021 Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2012-13 Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti cuke Pr.CIT-2, Vs. Limited, Jaipur. Village- palsana Main Market, Palsana, Dist.- Sikar- 332402 (Raj) PAN No.: AABAP 8390 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri B.K.…

Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Palsana vs. PCIT-2, Jaipur

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 35/JPR/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Nov 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 35 To 37/Jp/2021 Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2012-13 Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Cuke Pr.Cit-2, Vs. Limited, Jaipur. Village- Palsana Main Market, Palsana, Dist.- Sikar- 332402 (Raj) Pan No.: Aabap 8390 A Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 02/11/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit-2, Jaipur All Dated 31/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2010-11 To 2012-13. 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.CIT-DR)
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 35 to 37/JP/2021 Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2012-13 Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti cuke Pr.CIT-2, Vs. Limited, Jaipur. Village- palsana Main Market, Palsana, Dist.- Sikar- 332402 (Raj) PAN No.: AABAP 8390 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri B.K.…

M/S.the Chombal Service Co-Op Bank Ltd, Vadakara vs. The ITO, Kozhikkode

ITA 387/COCH/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Feb 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: S/Shri George Mathan, Jm & B.R. Baskaran, Am Assessment Year : 2017-18 Vs. The Chombal Service Co- The Income Tax Officer, Operative Bank Ltd., Ward-2(2), Kozhikode. 1478 H.O. Chombala, Chombala Post, Vadakara, Kozhikode-673 308 [Pan:Aaaat 6777E] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) I.T.A. No.386/Coch/2020 Assessment Year : 2017-18 The Nadakkuthazha Service Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Bank Ltd. No. Ward-2(2), Kozhikode D2668, Near Govt. Hospital, Vadakara, Kozhikode-673 101. [Pan: Aaaan 2328M] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee By Shri V.S. Narayanan, Ca Revenue By Smt. Jamuna Devi, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 09/02/2021 Date Of 09/02/2021 Pronouncement

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

…like the Andhra Act that Citizen Cooperative Society Ltd. (supra) considered, ‘nominal members’ are ‘members’ as defined under the Kerala Act. This Court in U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd., Lucknow v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow-I (1997) 11 SCC 287 referred to section 80P of the IT Act and then held: “8. The expression “members” is not defined in the Act. Since a cooperative society has to be established under the provisions of the law made by the State Legislature in that regard, the expression “members” in Section 80-P(2)(a)(i) must, therefore, be construed in the context of the provisions…

M/S.the Nadakkuthazha Servic Co-Opbank Ltd, Vadakara vs. The ITO, Kozhikkode

ITA 386/COCH/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Feb 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: S/Shri George Mathan, Jm & B.R. Baskaran, Am Assessment Year : 2017-18 Vs. The Chombal Service Co- The Income Tax Officer, Operative Bank Ltd., Ward-2(2), Kozhikode. 1478 H.O. Chombala, Chombala Post, Vadakara, Kozhikode-673 308 [Pan:Aaaat 6777E] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) I.T.A. No.386/Coch/2020 Assessment Year : 2017-18 The Nadakkuthazha Service Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Bank Ltd. No. Ward-2(2), Kozhikode D2668, Near Govt. Hospital, Vadakara, Kozhikode-673 101. [Pan: Aaaan 2328M] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee By Shri V.S. Narayanan, Ca Revenue By Smt. Jamuna Devi, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 09/02/2021 Date Of 09/02/2021 Pronouncement

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

…like the Andhra Act that Citizen Cooperative Society Ltd. (supra) considered, ‘nominal members’ are ‘members’ as defined under the Kerala Act. This Court in U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd., Lucknow v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow-I (1997) 11 SCC 287 referred to section 80P of the IT Act and then held: “8. The expression “members” is not defined in the Act. Since a cooperative society has to be established under the provisions of the law made by the State Legislature in that regard, the expression “members” in Section 80-P(2)(a)(i) must, therefore, be construed in the context of the provisions…