Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO

58 Taxmann.com 35High Court2015#934 most cited

What is Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO authority for?

When a co-operative society earns interest on deposits with scheduled banks, this income is assessable under "Income from other sources" (Section 56), and the society is entitled to deduct related administrative and proportionate expenses under Section 57 to tax only the net interest income.

114

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO · co-operative society interest income · Section 56 Income from other sources · Section 57 deductions · administrative expenses deduction · proportionate expenses deduction · interest on bank deposits · net interest income taxability · Section 80P · interplay Section 56 Section 57 Section 80P · Karnataka High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO

The Bbr & Rdcc Employess Co-Operative Society Limited, Banghalore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(4), Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 17/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. The Bbr & Rdcc Bank Vs. Ito, Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd., Ward – 5(2)(4), No.6, 5Th Main Road, Chamarajpet, Bengaluru. Bengaluru. Pan : Aaaab 1346 D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Girish, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2023 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 19.07.2022 Of Nfac, Delhi, Relating To Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Assessee Is A Co-Operative Society Registered Under The Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 & Is Engaged In Providing Small Credit Facilities To The Members Of The Society. The Assessee Received Interest On Investments Made In Financial Institutions Other Than Co- Operative Societies Of A Sum Of Rs.18,07,490/-. The Assessee Claimed That The Aforesaid Interest Income Is Originally For A Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). The Claim Of The Assessee Was Rejected By The Ao Based On The Decision Of The Hon’Ble Karnataka High Court In The Case Of Pcit, Hubli Vs. Totgars Co-Operative Sale Society Ltd., (2017) 83 Taxmann 140 (Karnataka). The Page 2 Of 6

For Appellant: Shri. Girish, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel
Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC - C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/s. The BBR and RDCC Bank Vs. ITO, Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., Ward – 5(2)(4), No.6, 5th Main Road, Chamarajpet, Bengaluru. Bengaluru. PAN : AAAAB 1346 D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Girish, CA Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date of hearing : 02.02.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 06.02.2023 O R D E R This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 19.07.2022 of NFAC, Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The assessee is a…

Sree Renukamba Credit Co-Op. Society Ltd., Davanagere vs. ITO, Ward-1, Davanagere

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1122/BANG/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojarisree Renukamba Credit Co- Vs The Income Tax Officer Operative Society Ltd. Ward - 1 Vinobanagara, Pb Road Davanagere Davanagere 577006 Pan – Abias7107E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Sandeep C, Ca Revenue By: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing: 17.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.01.2023 O R D E R Per: Chandra Poojari, A.M. This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated 23.11.2022 For Ay 2020-21. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: - “1. That The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) In So Far It Is Prejudicial To The Interests Of The Appellant Is Bad & Erroneous In Law & Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. That The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) Erred In Law & On Facts In Deciding The Appeal Ex-Parte On The Ground That The Appellant Did Not Respond To The Hearing Notices & Such Finding Is Perverse As The Appellant Has Sought Adjournment. 3. That The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) Erred In Law & On Facts In Not Considering The Fact That The Appellant Responded To The Intimation U/S 143(1) Of The Act

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep C, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…posits under the head income from other sources. 4 Sree Renukamba Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. The Ld.Counsel placed reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in keep case of Totgars co-operative sale society Ltd. vs ITO reported in (2015) 58 Taxmann.com 35. We have perused plethora of decisions on this issue by Hon’ble Karnataka High Court and the ratio laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of the Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. Vs. ITO reported in 322 ITR 283 held that, Income from utilisation of surplus funds was taxable under the head income from othe…

M/S. Kotekar Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, Mangaluru vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(4), Mangaluru

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1232/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Mar 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2015-16 M/S. Kotekar Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, The Income Tax Officer, 5-4(5), Raitha Sadana, Ward – 2(4), Beeri, Kotekar, Mangalore. Mangalore – 575 022. Vs. Pan: Aaaak2844D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Prashanth .G.S, Ca : Shri Sankar Ganesh K, Jcit Revenue By (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 31-01-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 14-03-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Arises Out Of Order Dated 19.03.2019 Passed By Ld.Cit(A), Mangaluru On Following Grounds Of Appeal: Tax Effect In Sl.No. Grounds Of Appeal Rs. A) The Orders Of The Authorities Below In So Far As These Are Against The Appellant Is Opposed To Law, Weight Of Evidence, Natural Justice, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Appellant'S 1. Case. B) The Appellant Denies Itself Liable To Be Assessed On A Total Income Of Rs.82,17,400/- As Against The Returned Income Of Rs.1,99,640/- Under The Facts & Circumstances

For Appellant: Shri Prashanth .G.S, CA
Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2015-16 M/s. Kotekar Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, The Income Tax Officer, 5-4(5), Raitha Sadana, Ward – 2(4), Beeri, Kotekar, Mangalore. Mangalore – 575 022. Vs. PAN: AAAAK2844D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Prashanth .G.S, CA : Shri Sankar ganesh K, JCIT Revenue by (DR) Date of Hearing : 31-01-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 14-03-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal arises out of order dated 19.03.2019 passe…

Krishnarajapet Taluk Agri Pro Co Op Marketing Society, Mandya vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 514/BANG/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Feb 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2015-16 M/S. Krishnarajapet Taluk Agri Pro Co-Op Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Marketing Society Ltd., Mysore. K. R. Pet, K. R. Pet Taluk, Mandya 571 426. Pan : Aaaak 4566 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Shankar Gowda H, Fca Revenue By : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 08.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan: V. Vasudevan

For Appellant: Shri. Shankar Gowda H, FCAFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(i)Section 80P(4)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2015-16 M/s. Krishnarajapet Taluk Agri Pro Co-op Vs. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Marketing Society Ltd., Mysore. K. R. Pet, K. R. Pet Taluk, Mandya 571 426. PAN : AAAAK 4566 E APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Shankar Gowda H, FCA Revenue by : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 08.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 08.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President : V. Vasudevan, Vice President This is a…

Manchi Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha, Bantwal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Mangaluru

In the result, appeal by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 704/BANG/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Feb 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Manchi Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha, 67, Manchi Kukkaje, The Income Tax Manchi Bantwala, Officer, Dakshina Kannada, Ward – 2, Putturu – 574 323, Mangaluru. Vs. Karnataka. Pan: Aaaam4199F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Ravish Rao, Ca : Shri Sankar Ganesh K, Jcit Revenue By (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 03-02-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 03-02-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 18.10.2021 U/S. 250 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2017-18 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Learned Assessing Officer Has Erred In Disallowing The Deduction Claimed By The Cooperative Society Of Z. 60,91,244/- Under Section 80P(2)(A)(I) & The Learned First Appellate Authority Has Erred In Confirming The Orders Of The Assessing Authority.

For Appellant: Shri Ravish Rao, CA
Section 250Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/s. Manchi Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha, 67, Manchi Kukkaje, The Income Tax Manchi Bantwala, Officer, Dakshina Kannada, Ward – 2, Putturu – 574 323, Mangaluru. Vs. Karnataka. PAN: AAAAM4199F APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Ravish Rao, CA : Shri Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT Revenue by (DR) Date of Hearing : 03-02-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 03-02-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by a…

Grama Seva Sahakari Sangh Ltd, Belgaum vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(4), Belagavi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1/PAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji15 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.01/Pan/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Grama Seva Sahakari Sangh Ltd., Sankonhatti, Tq: Athani, Dist. Belgaum. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aaaag0157B बनाम / V/S. Ito, Ward-1(4), ……""यथ" / Respondent Belagavi. Assessee By : Shri Shivanand Halbhavi Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.11.2021 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 15.11.2021 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Gulbarga (‘Cit(A)’ For Short) Dated 26.10.2017 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Appellant Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. The Learned A.O. & Learned Cit (A) Have Erred In Disallowing Deduction Claimed Under Section 80P(2)(A) By Treating Is As Income From Other Sources. 2. The Learned A.O. Has Erred In Treating Income From Business & Profession As Income From Other Sources. 3. The Learned Ao & Learned Cit(A) Have Wrongly Interpreted The Provisions Of Sec 80P(2)(D) By Not Treating As Co-Op. Societies. 4. The Learned Ao Has Wrongly Interpreted The Definition Of Co-Op Society Vide Sec. 2(19) Of The It Act, 1961 By Treating Those Entities Which Are Registered Under The Co-Op Societies, 1912(2 Of 1912), Or Under Any Other Law For The Time Being In Force In Any State For The Registration Of Co-Op Societies, As Not Being Co-Op Societies.

For Appellant: Shri Shivanand HalbhaviFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak
Section 143(3)Section 2(19)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…om other cooperative society of Rs.3,20,800/- on the ground that the parties from whom the interest was received is a cooperative bank placing reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. vs. ITO, 322 ITR 272. 4. Being aggrieved by the above action of the Assessing Officer, an appeal was preferred before the ld. CIT(A), who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer placing reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. (supra). 3 5. Being aggrieved by the above decis…