Landmark Cases on TDS and Withholding

310 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Bharti Cellular Limited v. ACIT (
45 SOT 82 · 2011 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

A taxpayer who provides the PAN of deductees and declarations from them discharges their obligation regarding tax payment by payees, shifting the onus to the TDS officer to verify the deductees' tax payments.

Shri Piyush C. Mehta v. ACIT
52 SOT 27 · 2012 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

A non-jurisdictional decision of a higher judicial body must be followed, especially when it aligns with decisions from higher courts and previous tribunal rulings on similar facts. The deduction of TDS is allowable if paid by the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1), and the revenue must substantiate any claims of double deduction.

(P) Limited v. Ad.CIT
55 DTR 241 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Delay in filing TDS statements is not penalized if it is not intentional and occurs because the statements cannot be filed before tax payment.

Welspring Universal v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Range
56 Taxmann.com 174 · 2015 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Tax is required to be deducted at source under section 195 only if the income payable to a non-resident is chargeable to tax in India. Income is chargeable if it is received or deemed to be received, or has accrued or arisen or deemed to have accrued or arisen in India.

CIT TDS v. Bharat Hotels Ltd.
64 Taxmann.com 325 · 2015 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Interest under section 201(1A) is compensatory and cannot be charged for the period beyond the date when the recipient has deposited the tax.

Maharashtra Cricket Association v. DCIT
75 Taxmann.com 114 · 2016 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Orders passed while processing a return under Section 200A of the Act for periods prior to June 1, 2015, are binding.

HMT Ltd. v. CIT
140 Taxmann 606 · 2004 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Penalty under section 272A(2)(k) for late issuance of TDS certificate is deleted when TDS is paid in time, returns are filed on time, and there is no loss to revenue, as the delay is technical or venial.

Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. Director of Income Tax
46 SOT 323 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Where commission is paid outside India to a foreign agent for services rendered outside India, the income does not accrue or arise in India. Consequently, the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source, and disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) is not warranted.

G.K. Traders v. ITO
143 Taxmann.com 425 · 2022 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Delay in filing a buyer's declaration under Section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, does not empower the Assessing Officer to deny the benefit of the declaration to the assessee.

Bharat Forge Ltd. v. Addl CIT
36 Taxmann.com 574 · 2013 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Payments for the operation and maintenance of windmills attract the provisions of Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, requiring tax deduction at source.