Landmark Cases on TDS and Withholding

268 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Naresh Bhavani Shah (HUF) v. CIT
84 Taxmann.com 53 · 2017 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) can be given to a person other than the deductee if certain conditions are met, including the filing of a declaration as prescribed by Rule 37BA(2).

ASK Wealth Advisors (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
42 Taxmann.com 277 · 2014 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

No tax is deductible at source when payments are made merely towards reimbursement of expenses incurred on the assessee's behalf by another entity.

DCIT v. Divi’s Laboratories Ltd.
131 ITD 271 · 2011 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not require tax to be deducted at source on payments made to non-resident agents for services rendered entirely outside India, as such income is not taxable in India.

Lampmaster Wolters India P. Ltd. v. ITO
141 Taxmann.com 149 · 2022 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Late fees under section 234E can be levied for belated TDS returns filed, and processed, on or after June 1, 2015, in line with amendments to section 200A.

Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd vs CIT: 432 ITR 471 (SC); Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd. v. CIT
217 CTR 102 · 2008 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Payments for bandwidth connectivity charges are not fees for technical services requiring tax deduction at source under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, disallowance of such expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) is not justified.

201(14). CIT v. Rishikesh Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
253 ITR 310 · 2002 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest under section 201(1A) cannot be charged if the assessee has paid more tax than payable, resulting in a refund, even after considering tax deducted at source. If a payer fails to deduct tax but the recipient pays it when due, levying interest under section 201(1A) is improper.

CIT v. Prem Nath Motors (P) Ltd.
253 ITR 705 · 2002 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest levied for delayed payment of TDS is compensatory in nature, not a penalty, and is therefore allowable as a deduction under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Hindustan Lever Ltd.
306 ITR 25 · 2008 · Reported
12
citing judgments

Where a contract is for the sale of materials simpliciter, Section 194C is not attracted, and no deduction for tax is required. The Gujarat High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, which relied on Circular 715/1995, dismissing the department's appeal.

CIT v. Tide Water Marine International Inc.
309 ITR 85 · 2009 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest under Section 234B is not leviable when the entire income of the assessee was deductible at source under Section 195. Provisions for advance tax under Sections 234B and 234C are not applicable if tax is deductible at source under Section 195.

Dy. CIT v. Delhi Transco Ltd.
52 Taxmann.com 261 · 2014 · Reported
12
citing judgments

A power utility is not required to deduct TDS under section 194J when using its distribution network to sell energy to end consumers, as this does not involve human element.

DCIT v. Angelique International Ltd.
55 SOT 226 · 2013 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Commission paid to foreign agents for services rendered outside India is not taxable in India, and therefore, tax deduction at source under Section 195 is not required.

339 (Bom) Auro Mira Biopower India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO TDS
55 Taxmann.com 452 · 2015 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

There will be no Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on transmission charges.

CIT v. Delhi Transco Limited
68 Taxmann.com 231 · 2016 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

A payer cannot be held liable for the principal tax demand when tax has not been deducted at source. Only interest liability under section 201(1A) can be imposed in such cases.

Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. JCIT
93 Taxmann.com 183 · 2018 · Reported
12
citing judgments

The plea of 'bonafide' has no bearing on the determination of disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. An assessee uncertain about taxability should approach the Assessing Officer under Section 195(2) rather than pleading bonafide later.

IT Vs Ambassador Travels (P) Ltd (208) 173 Taxman 407 (Del). 3. Shri Satchidanand S. Pandit v. ITO (208)
11 SOT 302 · 2007 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Payments made through a running account in the ordinary course of business are not to be treated as advances or loans under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, and therefore not deemed dividend.

Sunil Kumar Gupta v. ACIT
389 ITR 38 · 2016 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges paid by a tenant are considered rent and are subject to TDS under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, even if paid to a third party, as the term 'rent' is broadly interpreted to include payments for the use of property and associated services.

CIT v. Cadbury India Ltd.
11 Taxmann.com 66 · 2011 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Penalty for failure to deduct or deposit tax will not be sustained if there is no malafide intention, negligence, or want of bona fide, but a misconceived belief about the applicability of a legal provision.

PCIT v. Make My Trip India (P.) Ltd.
104 Taxmann.com 263 · 2019 · High Court
11
citing judgments

The Delhi High Court has held that services provided by payment gateways can be considered fees rather than commission, distinguishing them from brokerage paid for facilitating the buying or selling of goods.