Landmark Cases on TDS and Withholding

191 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
67 Taxmann.com 259 · 2016 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Tax is deductible at source under Section 194A only on interest that has 'partaken the character of income' in the hands of the recipient.

CIT v. Career Launcher India Ltd.
358 ITR 179 · 2013 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Payments made under an agreement involving profit sharing through joint efforts are not considered payments for "carrying out any work" for the purpose of attracting TDS under Section 194C and consequential disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia).

CIT v. Qatar Airways
332 ITR 253 · 2011 · High Court
24
citing judgments

A difference between the commercial price and published price of airline tickets is not a special commission or brokerage under section 194H, if the airline has discretion to reduce the published price.

Transmission Corporation of AP Ltd. v. CIT
105 Taxmann 742 · 1999 · Supreme Court
23
citing judgments

The scheme of TDS applies to gross sums payable, even if the entire amount isn't income for the recipient, where income tax is leviable on that sum. This includes payments to contractors where the entire sum may not be income of the recipient.

Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi v. Eli Lilly and Company (India) Private Ltd.
15 SCC 1 · 2009 · Reported
23
citing judgments

Income tax is deductible at source under Section 4(2) and Section 192(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, where a sum paid to a non-resident is chargeable to tax. These sections are part of the machinery provisions for the collection and recovery of tax.

CIT v. Hutchison Essar Telecom Ltd.
323 ITR 230 · 2010 · High Court
23
citing judgments

An order for default committed under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act cannot be passed after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant financial year. This limitation period is considered reasonable, similar to Section 201(3) concerning tax deduction at source.

Japan Airlines Co. Limited v. CIT
377 ITR 372 · 2015 · Supreme Court
23
citing judgments

Payments made for services rendered, regardless of the nomenclature used, do not attract the provisions of Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act.

Dishnet Wireless Ltd. v. DCIT
60 Taxmann.com 329 · 2015 · ITAT
23
citing judgments

Tax is not required to be deducted at source (TDS) on a provision when the payee is not identifiable or ascertainable at the time the provision is made. The mechanism for TDS under Chapter XVII-B cannot be invoked in such circumstances.

CIT v. Manipal Health Systems (P.) Ltd.
375 ITR 509 · 2015 · High Court
22
citing judgments

The distinction between a 'contract for service' and a 'contract of service' in determining an employer-employee relationship requires examination of factors like independence, control, and intention of the parties as per the contract's provisions.

CIT v. Indo Matsushita Carbon Co. Ltd.
286 ITR 201 · 2006 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Interest paid is outside the ambit of Section 194A if it is compensatory and not related to a deposit, debt, or loan.

CIT v. Cargo Linkers
179 Taxmann 151 · 2009 · High Court
22
citing judgments

A clearing and forwarding agent is an intermediary who books cargo and facilitates the contract for carrying goods. Therefore, such an agent is not liable to withhold tax under section 194C from payments made towards air freight on behalf of its customers.

CIT v. Kalyani Steels Ltd.
91 Taxmann.com 359 · 2018 · High Court
22
citing judgments

The liability to deduct tax at source does not arise if there is no income embedded in a payment, as TDS provisions are merely an alternative method of tax collection. An amount not includible in a person's total income cannot be considered 'income' for TDS purposes.

ACIT v. Bharati Cellular Ltd.
105 ITD 129 · 2007 · ITAT
21
citing judgments

The case establishes a precedent in favour of the revenue regarding issues related to Section 194H, Section 201(1), and Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, concerning the treatment of a company as an assessee in default.

J.B. Boda & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. CBDT
223 ITR 271 · 1997 · Supreme Court
21
citing judgments

The method of settlement of accounts is irrelevant in determining the true nature of a transaction for tax purposes. Export proceeds received in foreign exchange and utilized abroad are considered deemed receipts in India if properly reported.

Mahindra & Mahindra Limited v. DCIT
24 Taxmann.com 267 · 2012 · Reported
21
citing judgments

Interest paid on debentures until their conversion into shares is considered interest on borrowed money and is subject to TDS provisions. Such interest cannot be treated as dividend.

ITO v. Prasad Production Ltd., Chennai
125 ITD 263 · 2010 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

Payments made to foreign agents are not liable for tax deduction at source under Section 195, and consequently, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) can be made in the hands of the assessee payer.

Lingeshwara Creations v. PCIT
168 Taxmann.com 383 · 2024 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Late fees under Section 234E cannot be imposed while processing TDS applications under Section 200A if Section 200A was not in effect during the relevant assessment years.

Ramesh Kaurani v. Union of India
249 Taxmann 402 · 2017 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Late fees under Section 234E and demands under Section 200A are correctly levied for defaults in filing TDS statements, even for periods before the 2015 amendment to Section 200A, as the amendment was clarificatory and not retrospective.

CIT v. Ahmedabad
25 Taxmann.com 201 · 2012 · Supreme Court
20
citing judgments

No taxes are required to be deducted at source on discounts. This decision follows the Gujarat High Court's ruling in Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India.

(RE: CIT v. SK Tekriwal
90 DTR 26 · 2013 · High Court
20
citing judgments

No disallowance or proportionate disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act can be made for short deduction of tax.

ITO v. Tejmalbhai & Co.
99 ITD 399 · 2006 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

The section under which tax is deducted at source (TDS) by the payer does not determine the nature of income in the hands of the recipient. Income received as rent is assessable as business income, not income from house property, even if TDS is wrongly deducted under Section 194-I.

CIT v. Sikandarkhan N. Tunvar
33 Taxmann.com 133 · 2013 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) applies to amounts payable at any time during the financial year, not just those payable on March 31st. The Gujarat High Court in CIT v. Sikandarkhan N. Tunvar (33 taxmann.com 133) held this interpretation.

Atlas Brands (P) Ltd. v. CIT (TDS)
152 Taxmann.com 384 · 2023 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

Levy of late fees under Section 234E is illegal for TDS returns filed prior to June 1, 2015, if the ratio in Fatheraj Singhvi is applied. Matters can be restored to CIT(A) for decision on merits.

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. DCIT
130 Taxmann.com 295 · 2021 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Tax is not deductible until the income accrues to the payee, and TDS liability arises only when the quantum of expenses is ascertained and the payee is identified. Provisions for expenses do not attract TDS until the actual work is assigned or completed.

Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. UOI (
124 Taxmann 628 · 2002 · High Court
19
citing judgments

No tax is required to be deducted at source on discounts.

Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT
152 Taxmann.com 55 · 2023 · Reported
19
citing judgments

Interest under Section 201(1A) is not leviable if there is no short deduction of TDS, particularly when income has not accrued to the vendor at the time of provision creation and withholding tax provisions are not applicable.

CIT v. Harsiddh Construction Pvt. Ltd.
244 ITR 417 · 2000 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Penalty under Section 272A(2) and 271C cannot be levied for belated TDS deposit if the amount along with interest has been paid, as this constitutes a technical or venial breach and does not cause revenue loss. The Assessing Officer's discretion to levy penalties must be exercised judiciously.

East India Hotels Ltd. v. CBDT
320 ITR 526 · 2010 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Section 194C applies to contracts where 'work' is carried out, which must be interpreted in a limited sense and extended only to service contracts specifically included in the section by Explanation III.

CIT(TDS) v. Rajasthan Urban Infrastructure
37 Taxmann.com 154 · 2013 · High Court
19
citing judgments

TDS is not required on the service tax component of a payment if the service tax is payable separately and not included in the fees for professional or technical services, as per the agreement.

Biswajit Das v. Union of India
413 ITR 92 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The levy of fee under section 234E of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is automatic in cases of delay in filing a statement of tax deducted at source, irrespective of any specific order being passed under section 200A.

IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (TDS) LTU
59 Taxmann.com 107 · 2015 · Reported
19
citing judgments

Tax is deductible at source on provisions made at the year-end, even if the payee is not identifiable at that point, as the obligation to deduct arises when the sum is credited to a suspense account or similar designation.

CIT v. United Rice Land Ltd.
322 ITR 594 · 2010 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Section 194C is attracted when payments are made for carrying out work in pursuance of a contract with a specified person. If vehicles are hired on an 'as and when needed' basis, Section 194C may not apply.

Kotak Securities Ltd. v. DCIT
18 Taxmann.com 48 · 2012 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

Payment of commission for bank guarantee is not covered by Section 194H of the Income Tax Act. TDS is not required on such payments as they do not represent commission or brokerage in the context of agency.

(a) Pinstorm Technologies (P) Ltd. v. ITO (
11 Taxmann.com 431 · 2011 · Reported
18
citing judgments

Payments for online advertising services to a non-resident without a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India are not subject to TDS as they constitute business profits not taxable in India. Consequently, disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) is not applicable.

Sarala Devi (K.) (Smt.) v. Commissioner of Income-tax
222 ITR 211 · High Court
18
citing judgments

A payment made to trustees is not liable for TDS under section 194C when the assessee has no obligation to deduct tax at source. The mere fact that funds pass through the assessee's bank account does not make it the assessee's income or the payment to the trustee the assessee's expenditure.

Asst. CIT v. Om Prakash Gattani
242 ITR 638 · 2000 · High Court
18
citing judgments

An assessee cannot be denied the credit of tax deducted at source (TDS) if they produce Form 16A, and any demand notice issued under Section 221(1) for non-payment of tax, when TDS credit is due, cannot be sustained.

Sea Foods Ltd. v. CIT
265 ITR 644 · 2004 · Reported
18
citing judgments

Payment contemplated under Section 195 includes payments made in kind, not just cash or by cheque/draft.

CIT v. Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd.
319 ITR 409 · 2009 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

A deductor is not considered an assessee in default under section 201 if the deductee has paid the taxes due on the income, which is also recognized by the proviso to section 201 inserted in 2012.

Tube Investments of India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax (TDS)
325 ITR 610 · 2010 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Failure to deduct tax at source triggers Section 201 automatically as Chapter XVIIB provisions are for tax recovery. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) is distinct from an assessee being in default.

CIT v. P.V.S. Memorial Hospital Ltd.
380 ITR 284 · 2016 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Deduction under a wrong provision of law does not absolve an assessee from the disallowance provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) for short deduction of tax at source.

PCIT v. Nova Technoplast Private Limited
94 Taxmann.com 322 · 2018 · High Court
18
citing judgments

TDS provisions apply only to sums that are chargeable to tax under the Income-tax Act.