CIT v. Manipal Health Systems (P.) Ltd.

375 ITR 509High Court2015#5272 most cited

What is CIT v. Manipal Health Systems (P.) Ltd. authority for?

The distinction between a 'contract for service' and a 'contract of service' hinges on multi-factor tests, including the independence, control, and intention tests, and is ultimately determined by the contract's provisions.

22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Manipal Health Systems · contract for service · contract of service · employer-employee relationship · independence test · control test · intention test · section 194J · section 192 · section 201(1A)

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Manipal Health Systems (P.) Ltd.

DCIT, TDS Circle, Coimbatore vs. M/S Kovai Medical Centre and Hospital Limited, Coimbatore

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1004/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1004/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Kovai Medical Centre & Income Tax, V. Hospital Limited, Tds Circle, 99 Avinashi Road, Coimbatore. Coimbatore - 641 014. [Pan: Aaack-9192-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. M. Rajan, Cit -Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri. M. Rajan, CIT -DRFor Respondent: Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate
Section 133ASection 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

…herefore, opined that the department does not have individual materials to reassess the income of consultant doctors. 18. The assessee had also relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs Manipal Health Systems P Ltd [2015] 375 ITR 509 (kar). The Hon’ble High Court has considered a similar issue in light of survey conducted and assessment order passed u/s. 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act, and after considering relevant facts held that mere providing of non-competition clause in agreement should not invalidate nature of profession. The relevant facts of the High Court are held as…

CIT v. Manipal Health Systems (P.) Ltd. (375 ITR 509) — Cited in 22 Judgments | BharatTax