Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

DCIT v. Gulshan Investment Co. Ltd.
31 Taxmann.com 113 · 2013 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Income-tax Rules can only be applied to shares held as investments and not to shares held as stock-in-trade. This is because the calculation of disallowance involves the value of investments, the income from which does not form part of the total income.

CIT v. Tony Electronics Ltd.
375 ITR 431 · 2015 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Foreign exchange fluctuation loss is an allowable business expenditure. Depreciation is an allowable deduction.

Quality Industries v. JCIT
161 ITD 217 · 2016 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Interest on partners' capital and remuneration to partners are appropriations of profit, not expenses, and therefore not subject to Section 14A disallowance.

Jet Lite (India) Ltd. v. CIT
185 ITR 555 · 1990 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Where an assessee has not claimed any amount by way of service tax as a deduction, there is no question of disallowance of any tax or dues under section 43B of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Elnet Technologies Ltd.
213 Taxmann 129 · 2013 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Income from developing and exploiting a structural facility on property is to be considered under the head 'business/profession', not 'income from house property'.

CIT v. George Oakes Ltd.
303 ITR 357 · 2008 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Accounting Standard AS-2 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India for the valuation of inventory is upheld. Inventory should be valued at purchase cost price, with commission and discounts adjusted against the cost of goods sold.