Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Coca Cola India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT
116 TTJ 880 · ITAT
16
citing judgments

Expenses incurred 'incidentally' to carrying on business, even if not strictly 'necessary' or incurred 'voluntarily', are deductible under Section 37(1) if they are for business purposes.

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax LTU, New Delhi v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
118 Taxmann.com 248 · 2020 · High Court
16
citing judgments

For computing the profits and gains of an insurance company, the Assessing Officer must resort to Section 44 and its prescribed rules. Provisions from Section 28 to 43B, including Section 14A, are excluded from the purview of Section 44 and cannot be applied.

ACE Designers Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
120 Taxmann.com 321 · 2020 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Investments made with the intention of earning dividend income or realizing enhancement value are considered business losses, not capital losses, when they become unrecoverable.

Pr. CIT v. Envestor Ventures Ltd.
123 Taxmann.com 378 · 2021 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act should be restricted only to the extent of exempt income earned by the assessee.

CIT v. New India Maritime Agencies (P.) Ltd.
124 Taxmann.com 801 · Reported
16
citing judgments

Income generated from a property owned by a company and used in its business operations is to be assessed as income from business, not income from other sources.

Commissioner of Income-tax, LTU v. Vijaya Bank
130 Taxmann.com 149 · 2021 · Reported
16
citing judgments

The Supreme Court admitted a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in a case involving a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, where the assessee debited the amount as irrecoverable into its accounts. This admission suggests a potential judicial review of the criteria for such deductions, particularly concerning the debiting of the amount as irrecoverable.

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. DCIT
130 TTJ 398 · 2010 · ITAT
16
citing judgments

Section 14A disallowance does not apply to insurance businesses. Income of insurance businesses is computed as per Section 44 read with specific provisions of the Income Tax Act.

2015) 45 CCH 0222. (e) DCIT v. Binani Industries Ltd. (Kolkata ITAT)
137 DTR 185 · 2016 · Reported
16
citing judgments

The remission or cessation of a trading liability is taxable under Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, if the assessee has received a benefit in an earlier year by way of deduction on account of such trading liability, and in the current year, such liability is no longer required to be met.

Oil India Co. Ltd. v. CIT
137 ITR 156 · 1982 · High Court
16
citing judgments

A loss arising from the restatement of an External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) utilized for acquiring capital assets in India is capital in nature, not revenue.

Commissioner of Income-tax v. E.K. R. Savumiamurthy
14 ITR 185 · 1946 · High Court
16
citing judgments

A periodical sum can be regarded as a source of income, and each business is treated as a distinct source of income.

PCIT v. REI Agro Ltd.
140 Taxmann.com 71 · 2022 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, can only be made in relation to income which does not form part of the total income. Such disallowance requires consideration of investments that have yielded exempt income, and cannot be made if no exempt income has been earned.

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi v. Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals ltd.
141 ITR 134 · 1983 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Receipts from the sale of tender forms, supply of water and electricity to contractors during factory construction, and sale of stones, boulders, grass, and trees are capital receipts, not independent income. These are inextricably linked to setting up the business and reduce the capital cost.

133 ITR 559 (Raj.)/Hindustan Aluminium Corporation Ltd. v. CIT
143 ITR 822 · 1983 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Payment to eliminate competition by a rival firm for a certain period, often in the form of consideration for a manufacturing agreement, is considered a revenue expenditure rather than a capital expenditure.

CIT v. R.Ramaiah & Ors (Kar)
146 ITR 39 · 1984 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Transactions involving the sale of land converted for non-agricultural use may be treated as an adventure in the nature of trade and taxed as business income, if sufficient inquiries are made by the Assessing Officer.

CIT vs. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Company, 42 Taxman.com 270 (Guj.); 6. CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd.
154 ITD 306 · ITAT
16
citing judgments

Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A if investments are made for business purposes, such as maintaining liquid funds for large government orders.

CIT v. Datacons (P) Ltd.
155 ITR 66 · 1985 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Processing of data, involving active coordination and collation of information to produce balance sheets, stock accounts, and sales analyses as per customer requirements, can be considered as processing of goods, if not manufacture of goods.

Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT
159 ITR 253 · 1986 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred with a view to producing profits is considered revenue expenditure.

Engineering Products (P) Ltd. 202 ITR 1014 (Delhi), CIT v. Dunlop Rubber Co. Ltd.
165 ITR 416 · 1987 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Payments made as reimbursement for expenses incurred on behalf of the payer are not considered income chargeable to tax in the hands of the payee.

Sadichha Chitra v. CIT
189 ITR 774 · 1991 · High Court
16
citing judgments

A grant made by the government to an assessee, which cannot be characterized as a trade receipt, is not considered a revenue receipt and is therefore not subject to tax.

CIT v. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe
190 ITR 198 · 1991 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Income diverted at source by an overriding title, such as a legal obligation to pay erstwhile partners for work done, is not taxable in the hands of the firm.

14 Page 15 JUDGMENT Similarly in G.P. Ceramics Private Limited v. Commissioner, Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh
2 SCC 90 · 2009 · Reported
16
citing judgments

When assessing the value of goods sold in separate transactions, separate prices charged for different buyers can be examined under Section 4(1)(a) proviso to determine if they are justified.

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. v. DCIT
2019 SCC OnLine ITAT 18321 · 2019 · Reported
16
citing judgments

Production of motor spirit by refining Naptha may be eligible for examination under section 80IB(9) as a "mineral oil". The case also touches upon the distinction between production and refining of crude oil/bitumen.

CIT v. Sivakami Mills Ltd.
227 ITR 465 · 1997 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

Interest on deferred payments for the purchase of machinery is deductible as revenue expenditure. Financial charges and upfront fees for loans taken to set up industry are also allowable as revenue expenditure.

Dy. DIT (IT) v. Technip Offshore Contracting BV
228 ITR 112 · 1997 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Government receipts, including various types of taxes received by an assessee, are consistently held to be taxable receipts.

National Engg. Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax
236 ITR 577 · 1999 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Deductions for liabilities that accrue on a time basis are allowable on a yearly basis, even if the liability is contingent.

40 TTR 67 (SC); Gotan Lime Syndicate v. CIT
239 ITR 817 · 1999 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

A distinction exists between royalty or rent payments, which are revenue expenditure, and lease premium payments made at once or in installments, which constitute capital expenditure.

CIT v. Excel
258 ITR 295 · 2013 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

Only the real income of an assessee is subject to tax. Tax authorities cannot tax income that has not actually accrued or been earned by the assessee.

CIT v. Bhawan Va Path Nirman (Bohra) & Co (No. 1)
258 ITR 431 · High Court
16
citing judgments

The past trading results of an assessee are the best guiding factor for estimating business income, particularly when dealing with unexplained purchases or short stock.

CIT v. Khimline Pumps Ltd.
258 ITR 459 · 2002 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Payments made for the acquisition of leasehold land are considered capital expenditure, not revenue expenditure. This applies even to subsequent lease rent installments when the initial installment was accepted as capital expenditure.

CIT v. International Data Management Ltd.
261 ITR 177 · 2003 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Income from service charges, maintenance revenue, and lease rent can be considered as derived from the main business activity of the assessee, provided there is a direct nexus. Such income may not be treated as income derived from an industrial undertaking for the purpose of Section 80-I.

15 to 23…… 24. In M. Janardhana Rao v. Jt. CIT
273 ITR 50 · 2005 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

Income cannot be estimated without rejecting the assessee's books of accounts. Such estimation is permissible only after a clear finding that the books are unreliable.

6 SCC 444. Recently, in Union of India v. Exide Industries Ltd.
273 Taxmann 189 · Reported
16
citing judgments
CIT v. Kisan 21 Poona Club Ltd. Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd.
274 ITR 119 · 2005 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Where an assessee earns interest income from investments and cannot specifically identify expenses incurred to earn it, an estimated expenditure as a percentage of income can be allowed as a deduction.

190 ITR 1 (SC) (8) CIT v. Sunil J. Kinariwala
28 Taxmann.com 94 · 2012 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Surcharge is part of rent.

Ravi Marketing (P) Ltd. v. CIT
280 ITR 519 · 2006 · High Court
16
citing judgments

An expenditure incurred during the year, even if it relates to accounting treatment in another year, can be allowed as a deduction in the year it is incurred for income tax purposes.

(i) CIT v. Rane (Madras) Ltd.
293 ITR 459 · 2007 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Expenditures are considered revenue in nature and deserve to be allowed when they meet the criteria for such deductibility.

Cloth Traders (P) Ltd. v. CIT
3 SCC 538 · 1986 · Reported
16
citing judgments

For the purpose of Section 80-M, deductions are to be allowed on gross total income and not on net income. This interpretation was later overruled by the Supreme Court.

CIT v. Dewan Steels Ltd.
311 ITR 161 · 2009 · High Court
16
citing judgments

The principle of consistency requires that a previously accepted methodology of valuation should be followed in subsequent assessment years, provided the method is in accordance with accepted accounting principles.

Cheminvest Ltd. v. ITO (ITAT, SB-Del)
319 ITR 416 · 2009 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Expenditure in relation to exempt income is to be disallowed under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act even when no exempt income is earned during the year, provided the investments have the potential to earn tax-free income.

CIT v. Sahara India Savings and Investment Corporation Ltd.
321 ITR 371 · 2010 · Reported
16
citing judgments

When a definition section states that a word 'means' something, it provides an exclusive definition. If additional categories are included, only those explicitly added are considered part of the definition.

CIT v. Munjal Showa Ltd.
329 ITR 449 · 2010 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for training personnel of the assessee, which is imperative to run the business and provides technical support, is revenue in nature and cannot be treated as capital expenditure.

Narandas Mathuradas & Co. v. CIT
35 ITR 461 · 1959 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred or losses arising incidentally to the carrying on of a business, rather than for the acquisition of a business or as a temporary investment, are deductible in computing the profits and gains of that business from a broad commercial perspective.

146 ITR 355. Punjab Steel Scrap Merchants Ass v. ClT
35 ITR 519 · 1959 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

Amounts collected by an assessee, such as security deposits for bottles that are integral to a commercial transaction and are ultimately not refunded, constitute trading receipts and are taxable as income.

Karnataka Bank v. CIT
356 ITR 539 · Reported
16
citing judgments

The fall in the value of investments made by a banking company to comply with RBI's SLR requirements is allowable as a deduction when computing business income, even if the books of account are treated differently.

(i) CIT v. Model Exims Kanpur
358 ITR 72 · 2013 · High Court
16
citing judgments

The court considers the addition made in the hands of the assessee as business income based on advertisement and subscription revenue.

(i) S. A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT
359 ITR 644 · 2013 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Interest expenditure is allowable as a deduction if there is a nexus between the expenditure and the business purpose, even if the borrowing is from a related party.

Carefour WC 86C India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
368 ITR 692 · 2014 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Business commencement can occur before revenue generation, and expenses incurred before commencement are allowable. The establishment of readiness to undertake business signifies its commencement.

Eicher Goodearth Ltd. v. CIT
378 ITR 28 · 2015 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed funds used to acquire shares in another company to maintain control is allowable as a business expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.

PCIT v. Keerthi Agro Mills (P.) Ltd.
38 Taxmann.com 386 · 2013 · High Court
16
citing judgments

The applicability of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules for the purchase of paddy, especially when purchases are made from farmers, is upheld. Cash purchases from farmers are not to be disallowed under Section 40A(3) if they meet the conditions of Rule 6DD.

RPG Enterprises Limited v. DCIT
386 ITR 401 · 2016 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for repair/renovation of leased premises is capital in nature, unless it qualifies as a revenue expenditure.