CIT v. Excel

258 ITR 295Supreme Court of India2013#6933 most cited

What is CIT v. Excel authority for?

Only the real income of an assessee is subject to tax. Tax authorities cannot tax income that has not actually accrued or been earned by the assessee.

16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Excel Industries Ltd. · real income · taxable income · actual income · income liable to tax · taxation of income · Supreme Court

Judgments citing CIT v. Excel

Mema Engineers & Contractors P. Ltd., Mumbai vs. ACIT Cir. 6(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee company in ITA N0

ITA 654/MUM/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.654/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07) Mema Engineers & A.C.I.T. Circle – 6(3), बनाम/ Contractors Private Limited, Aayakar Bhavan, V. Unit No. G-6, Navbharat M.K. Road, Estate, Mumbai – 20. Zakaria Bunder, Mumbai – 400 015. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aaach 1383 E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri S. Senthil Kumaran
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 43B

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “G” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.654/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07) Mema Engineers & A.C.I.T. Circle – 6(3), बनाम/ Contractors Private Limited, Aayakar Bhavan, v. Unit No. G-6, Navbharat M.K. Road, Estate, Mumbai – 20. Zakaria Bunder, Mumbai – 400 015. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAACH 1383 E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee by Shri Nishit Gandhi Revenue by : Shri S. Senthil Kumaran सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date of He…

CIT v. Excel (258 ITR 295) — Cited in 16 Judgments | BharatTax