Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Kerala Financial Corporation v. CIT
261 ITR 708 · 2003 · High Court
29
citing judgments

Amendments to Section 36(1)(viii) are prospective, meaning deductions allowed for amounts transferred to a special reserve prior to the amendment, and subsequently withdrawn, cannot be subjected to tax for assessment years prior to the amendment's effective date.

Commissioner of Income-tax v. Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd.
14 ITR 622 · 1946 · High Court
29
citing judgments

Expenses incurred by an assessee to bring into existence an asset of a lasting character, such as an electric service line requiring constant inspection, repairs, and replacement, are capital in nature and not revenue expenditure. Amounts contributed by a consumer for a new connection can be considered in direct recoupment of such capital expenditure.

CIT v. Consulting Engineering Group Ltd.
365 ITR 284 · 2014 · High Court
29
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer who finds a transaction with a subcontractor to be unreal must add the commission earned on such transaction as undisclosed income, rather than treating the entire transaction as undisclosed income.

Sedco Forex International Inc. v. CIT
399 ITR 1 · 2017 · Supreme Court
29
citing judgments

Section 44BB, which provides for presumptive taxation of profits and gains of business in the case of exploration of mineral oils, does not override the provisions of Sections 5, 9, or 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For business profits to be taxed in India, the existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India must be established by the Revenue.

CIT v. Textool Co. Ltd.
216 Taxmann 327 · 2013 · Supreme Court
29
citing judgments

Payments made by an employer directly to the LIC towards an employees' group gratuity fund are allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provided the employer has no control over these funds.

Tata Sons Ltd. v. CIT
18 ITR 460 · 1950 · High Court
29
citing judgments

Expenditure claimed by an assessee-company is deductible if it is considered in light of commercial expediency, ordinary commercial trading principles, and whether it was part of the profit-making process.

DCIT v. Dishman Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals Ltd.
45 SOT 37 · 2019 · ITAT
29
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income is not allowable as a deduction. The Assessing Officer must appreciate that no part of interest or administrative expenditure was incurred in relation to exempt income before applying Rule 8D.

Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd. & CIT (1971)82 ITR 363 (SC), J.K. Synthetics Limited v. O.S. Bajpai, ITO
105 ITR 864 · 1976 · High Court
28
citing judgments

A cessation or remission of liability only arises when a creditor's claim ceases to exist in the eyes of the law, not merely because an addition was made by the Assessing Officer while the matter was still pending before an appellate forum.

Judicial Committee in Raja Bahadur Kamakshya Narain Singh of Ramgarh v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar & Orissa
11 ITR 513 · 1943 · Reported
28
citing judgments

A single payment made for acquiring the right to benefits granted by a lease, known as 'salami' or premium, is considered a capital receipt. This right is a capital asset, and the payment to acquire it is on capital account.

Mahenderpal Narang v. CBDT CWP 17971 of
110 Taxmann.com 16 · 2019 · Reported
28
citing judgments

Interest received by an assessee under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is not taxable.

JCIT v. ITC Ltd.
112 ITD 57 · 2008 · ITAT
28
citing judgments

Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with deductions only upon actual payment, does not apply to the employees' contribution to provident fund or other welfare funds, as the same is governed by Section 36(1)(va) of the Act. The deduction for employees' contribution is allowed if paid within the due date specified in the relevant Acts, including the grace period.

ACIT v. Amtek Auto Ltd.
112 TTJ 455 · 2006 · ITAT
28
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer cannot make an ad-hoc disallowance of expenditure without specific evidence of non-business related expenses. The assessee's appeal is decided in their favour when the disallowance is made on an arbitrary basis.

CIT v. Edward Keventer (P.) Ltd.
115 ITR 149 · 1978 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

When assessing expenses under Section 40A(2), tax authorities must consider the entire position judiciously from the viewpoint of a prudent businessman, not arbitrarily or capriciously. The revenue must demonstrate tax evasion and cannot disallow expenses if the recipient is taxed at the same or higher rate.

CIT v. Kalyanji Mavji and Co.
122 ITR 49 · 1980 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure not covered by a specific provision for deduction should be allowed under the residuary clause if it is in the nature of revenue expenditure.

CITVs T.S. HajeeMoosa& Co. (Mad) 153 ITR 422; Mysore Kirloskar Ltd. v. CIT(Kar)
122 ITR 839 · 1980 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure must be solely for promoting business to qualify for deduction under Section 37. The assessee bears the burden to prove expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

CIT v. Rampur Timber & Turnery Co. Ltd.
129 ITR 58 · 1981 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning income is deductible under Section 57(iii) even if no income is actually earned. The earning of income is not a pre-condition for allowing the deduction.

Pepsu Road Transport Corporation v. CIT
130 ITR 18 · 1981 · High Court
28
citing judgments

An element of refund or repayment is a must in the concept of borrowing, meaning perpetual bonds, unlike equity or share capital, may not be considered borrowings if they lack this repayment element.

CIT v. Shree Balaji Alloys & Ors.
138 DTR 36 · 2016 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

Incentives received by an industrial unit are capital in nature if granted to promote industrial development and employment, and are therefore not chargeable to tax. The purpose for which the subsidy is given, not the time or source of its grant, determines its character.

995 (Bom.), Hindustan Times Ltd. v. CIT (1980) 122 ITR 977, Sarabhai M. Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
151 ITR 726 · 1985 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred to obtain gas supply, where ownership of the pipeline remains with the supplier, is considered revenue expenditure. This is analogous to expenses for service lines where ownership remains with the provider.

Jamshedpur Motor Accessories Stores v. Union of India
189 ITR 70 · 1991 · High Court
28
citing judgments

An amendment to Section 43B, specifically the insertion of the first proviso, is held to be curative and declaratory, and thus retrospective in operation.

Commissioner of Income-tax v. Sri Jagannath Steel Corporation
191 ITR 676 · 1991 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Sales tax for the last quarter of an assessment year, paid before the filing of the return, is deductible under Section 43B. Amendments to Section 43B introducing a proviso are considered clarificatory, curative, and explanatory, making them retrospective.

CIT v. Karthikeyan (G.R)
201 ITR 866 · 1993 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

The purpose of the inclusive definition of 'income' in Section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act is to broaden its scope, meaning that even receipts not explicitly listed may still be considered income if they possess its nature.

CIT v. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
219 ITR 521 · 1996 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

Expenses incurred on amalgamation, legal and professional fees, and contributions to a State Housing Board for worker tenements are considered revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. This is because these expenditures do not result in an enduring benefit and are part of the company's operational costs.

Happy Forging Ltd. v. CIT
253 ITR 413 · 2002 · Reported
28
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings initiated on the ground that excise duty paid in advance was treated as an asset and not routed through the profit and loss account are valid.

(i) Viswas Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant CIT, Circle I, Madras
29 Taxmann.com 19 · 2013 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Deduction under section 80-IB(10) is available on a proportionate basis for eligible units, even if some units in a project exceed the prescribed area limits. The entire claim should not be rejected due to partial non-compliance.

CIT v. Alfa Laval India Ltd.
295 ITR 451 · 2007 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

Obsolete inventory can be written off at 10% of its cost if supported by a certified auditor's report, even if sold at a lower price in the subsequent year. Interest income earned from customers is considered business profit for Section 80HHC deductions if it's inextricably linked to the business.

Ltd. v. JCIT
32 Taxmann.com 197 · Reported
28
citing judgments

Where the exact quantification of a liability is to be determined in the future, but the liability itself is certain, it can be accounted for. This principle is applied when a wage agreement is being finalized.

Mangla Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO
325 ITR 281 · 2010 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Income from property is taxable as business income when the company's main object is dealing in properties, and renting is an ancillary activity. If the primary business is letting out property, income is taxed as income from house property.

1 Income-tax Officer-Ward 5(1) v. Keval Construction
33 Taxmann.com 277 · 2013 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Profits eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB are calculated after adjusting for disallowances made under Section 40(a)(ia). Any disallowances under Section 40A(3) are added back to the profits for the purpose of determining the deduction under Section 80-IB.

308 ITR 199 (Del) and CIT v. Spice Distribution Ltd.
374 ITR 30 · 2015 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure on advertisement and sales promotion is generally treated as business expenditure allowable under section 37 of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer cannot treat revenue expenditure as deferred revenue expenditure as the Act does not have such a concept.

CIT-I v. Reliance Energy Ltd.
441 ITR 346 · 2022 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

Deductions under Section 80IA are to be granted from Gross Total Income, not restricted to 'Profits & Gains of Business or Profession' income.

CIT vs. Ponni Sugar and Chemicals Limited: 306 ITR 392, Sahney Steel and Press Works v. CIT
60 ITR 253 · 1966 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

A sales tax incentive is not taxable if its purpose is to encourage the establishment or expansion of a new industrial unit, irrespective of when it is paid.

14/(2015) 229 (Punjab & Haryana) (iii) CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar
73 Taxmann.com 100 · 2016 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Once books of account are rejected, additions should not be made on a line-by-line basis. If the Assessing Officer rejects the books, they must either disallow all sundry creditors or allow only those for which genuineness can be proven.

CIT v. Ramniklal Kothari
74 ITR 57 · 1969 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

A partner's income from a firm, including salary, bonus, commission, or remuneration, is considered business income in their hands. Expenses necessary for earning this business income are deductible.

CTT v. Chunilal Prabhudas and Co.
76 ITR 566 · 1970 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Goodwill is the reputation of a business that attracts customers, is viewed as intangible but materially valued, and can be described metaphorically as a seed growing into an oak, a magnet's attracting force, or the differential return of profit.

Jaipuria Samla Amalgamated Collieries Ltd. v. CIT
82 ITR 580 · 1971 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

The expression 'profits or gains of any business or profession' refers only to profits and gains determined under Section 29 of the Income-tax Act. Taxes levied upon profits calculated in a manner other than that provided by Section 29 cannot be disallowed under Section 40(a)(ii).

CIT v. TVS Iyengar & Sons.
88 Taxmann 429 · 1996 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

The Supreme Court held that unclaimed credit balances that have become time-barred, if written back to the profit and loss account by the assessee, constitute a trading receipt and are thus taxable as business income under Section 28(i).

296 (Mumbai-Trib). PNC Construction Co Ltd. v. DCIT
92 Taxmann.com 106 · 2018 · Reported
28
citing judgments

Where an assessee enters into a development contract where it undertakes all acts from project design to handing over, it is considered to be developing a facility as a whole, not performing a specific work. This implies the ownership of the site is not transferred.

ACIT v. Leo Fasteners (
92 Taxmann.com 28 · 2018 · ITAT
28
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 80IA must be computed on a standalone basis, meaning the loss from one eligible unit cannot be set off against the profits of another eligible unit.

Jamshedpur Motor Accessories Stores v. CIT
95 ITR 664 · 1974 · High Court
28
citing judgments

For expenditure to be deductible, its reasonableness must be judged from the businessman's perspective, not the revenue's, considering commercial expediency.

Malpani House of Stones v. CIT
395 ITR 385 · 2017 · High Court
28
citing judgments

If an assessee's books of account are rejected and income is assessed on estimation, the rejected books cannot be simultaneously used to add undisclosed income by rejecting specific purchases.

CIT v. SriRama Sugar Mills Ltd.
52 ITR 153 · 1964 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred to create a new asset or an advantage of enduring nature is not deductible under section 10(2)(v). This expenditure is considered capital in nature.

Jackie Shroff v. ACIT, Range 16(1)
101 Taxmann.com 455 · 2019 · ITAT
28
citing judgments

An assessee can claim an outstanding balance as a business loss under Section 28 if it arises from regular business transactions, even if conditions for bad debt deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) are not met, provided sufficient evidence is produced.

Indian Overseas Bank v. CIT
183 ITR 200 · 1990 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Forward contracts in foreign currency that have not been settled do not represent actual profits or losses for tax purposes; they are considered notional or hypothetical income/loss.

CIT v. Jaypee DSC Ventures Ltd.
335 ITR 132 · 2011 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Interest income generated from fixed deposits, if purchased due to business exigencies or for the purpose of carrying on business activities, is to be treated as business income and not income from other sources.

Prestige Estate Projects (P) Ltd. v. DCIT
33 DTR 514 · 2010 · ITAT
28
citing judgments

A real estate developer adopting the completed contract method of accounting cannot be forced to follow the percentage completion method under AS-7 if AS-7 has not been specified by the Central Government under section 145(2). The Assessing Officer cannot reject accounts under section 145(3) solely on this ground.

CIT v. Syndicate Bank
422 ITR 460 · 2020 · High Court
28
citing judgments

The deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) for provisions for bad and doubtful debts is allowed to the extent of the actual provision made, subject to the prescribed ceiling. If the provision made is less than the prescribed limit, the deduction is limited to the actual provision made.

CIT v. H.H. Maharani Vijaykuverba Saheb of Morvi
100 ITR 67 · 1975 · High Court
27
citing judgments

The connection between an expenditure and the earning of income need not be direct; an indirect connection can establish the nexus between the expenditure incurred and the income earned for the purpose of Section 57(iii).

Digital Equipment India Ltd. v. DCIT
103 TTJ 329 · 2006 · ITAT
27
citing judgments

A mere substantial profit does not inherently indicate an arrangement to earn profits beyond ordinary levels to abuse tax concessions under Section 80-IA(9) or (10). The Assessing Officer must provide specific evidence of such an arrangement.

Mohan Breweries & Distilleries Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
116 ITD 241 · 2009 · ITAT
27
citing judgments

The initial assessment year for claiming deduction under Section 80-IA is the first year the assessee actually claims the deduction, not necessarily the first year the enterprise is set up. The deduction under Section 80-IA applies only from the assessment year in which the claim is first made.