Tools Pvt Ltd. v. CIT

238 ITR 268High Court1999#709 most cited

What is Tools Pvt Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) can consider questions of law arising in assessment proceedings even if they were not raised before the lower authorities. An appellate authority possesses all powers of the original authority, subject to statutory limitations.

142

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Gedore Tools Pvt Ltd v CIT · 238 ITR 268 · Tribunal powers · appellate authority powers · questions of law · assessment proceedings · section 253(1) · section 253(2)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Tools Pvt Ltd. v. CIT

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Plastograph India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the legal issue and the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 3557/DEL/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm Ita No. 3052/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 M/S Plastograph India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 23/5, Shakti Nagar, Central Circle-25, Delhi-110007 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 3557/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Acit, Vs M/S Plastograph India Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-5, 23/5, Shakti Nagar, New Delhi Delhi-110007 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp7194F Assessee By : Sh. Vinod Kumar Bindal & Sanjeev Bindal, Cas Revenue By : Sh. R. B. Meena, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.02.2016 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: These Cross Appeals Are Directed Against The Order Dated 30.04.2012 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xxxi, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Vinod Kumar Bindal & Sanjeev Bindal, CAsFor Respondent: Sh. R. B. Meena, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 254

…Board Vs Dy. CIT (2005) 278 ITR 218 (Cal) " Uma Polymers (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (2006) 101 TTJ (JD) TM 124 " Datamatics Ltd.Vs Asstt. CIT (2007) 111 TTJ (Mum-Trib.) 55 " Abhishek Industries Ltd. Vs CIT (2007) 290 ITR 655 (P&H) " Gedore Tools Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (1999) 238 ITR 268 (Del) " Director of Income-tax (Exemption) Vs Arunodya (2006) 286 ITR 383 (Del) " Satish Kumar Keshari Vs ITO (2007) 106 TTJ 980 (ITAT-Pat.) " ITO Vs Gurinder Kaur (2006) 102 ITD 189 (ITAT- Del) " CIT Vs J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. (2005) 197 CTR 73 (All.) " Dy. CIT Vs Maruti Udyog Ltd. (2006) 99 ITD 666 (Del-Trib) " CIT Vs Asho…

M/S. Plastograph India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the legal issue and the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 3052/DEL/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm Ita No. 3052/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 M/S Plastograph India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 23/5, Shakti Nagar, Central Circle-25, Delhi-110007 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 3557/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Acit, Vs M/S Plastograph India Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-5, 23/5, Shakti Nagar, New Delhi Delhi-110007 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp7194F Assessee By : Sh. Vinod Kumar Bindal & Sanjeev Bindal, Cas Revenue By : Sh. R. B. Meena, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.02.2016 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: These Cross Appeals Are Directed Against The Order Dated 30.04.2012 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xxxi, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Vinod Kumar Bindal & Sanjeev Bindal, CAsFor Respondent: Sh. R. B. Meena, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 254

…Board Vs Dy. CIT (2005) 278 ITR 218 (Cal) " Uma Polymers (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (2006) 101 TTJ (JD) TM 124 " Datamatics Ltd.Vs Asstt. CIT (2007) 111 TTJ (Mum-Trib.) 55 " Abhishek Industries Ltd. Vs CIT (2007) 290 ITR 655 (P&H) " Gedore Tools Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (1999) 238 ITR 268 (Del) " Director of Income-tax (Exemption) Vs Arunodya (2006) 286 ITR 383 (Del) " Satish Kumar Keshari Vs ITO (2007) 106 TTJ 980 (ITAT-Pat.) " ITO Vs Gurinder Kaur (2006) 102 ITD 189 (ITAT- Del) " CIT Vs J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. (2005) 197 CTR 73 (All.) " Dy. CIT Vs Maruti Udyog Ltd. (2006) 99 ITD 666 (Del-Trib) " CIT Vs Asho…

Waman Hari Pethe Sons, Mumbai vs. DCIT 15(1)

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 7105/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jan 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri N.K. Billaiyaआयकर अपील सं/ I.Ta No.5152/Mum/2010 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं/ I.Ta No.7105/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09 A N D आयकर अपील सं/ I.Ta No.6159/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम/ Waman Hari Pethe Sons, Acit, Cir 15(1), 110, Vikas Paradise, Matru Mandir, Tardev, Vs. L.B.S. Road, Mumbai Mulund (W), Mumbai -400 080 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: Shri S.C. Tiwari Uma Mahadeokar ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Shrikant Namdeo सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing :07.01.2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement :07.01.2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per N.K. Billaiya, Am: These Are Appeals By The Assessee Preferred Against Three Separate Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-26, Mumbai Dated 5.4.2010, 14.9.2012 & 13.8.2013 Pertaining To Assessment Years 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri S.C. TiwariFor Respondent: Shri Shrikant Namdeo
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40A(3)Section 68

…tted that the enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) is without notice and is against the settled proposition of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Rai Bahadur Hardutroy MOtilal Chamaria 66 ITR 443 (SC), Gedore Tools Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT 238 ITR 268 (Del). It is the say of the Ld. Counsel that the enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law and on this count only the appellate order need to be quashed. 9. Per contra, the Ld. Departmental Representative strongly supported the findings of the AO and also relied upon the findings of the Ld. CIT(A). 10. We have given a thoughtful consider…

Waman Hari Pethe Sons, Mumbai vs. Addl CIT Cir 15(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 5152/MUM/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jan 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri N.K. Billaiyaआयकर अपील सं/ I.Ta No.5152/Mum/2010 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं/ I.Ta No.7105/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09 A N D आयकर अपील सं/ I.Ta No.6159/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम/ Waman Hari Pethe Sons, Acit, Cir 15(1), 110, Vikas Paradise, Matru Mandir, Tardev, Vs. L.B.S. Road, Mumbai Mulund (W), Mumbai -400 080 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: Shri S.C. Tiwari Uma Mahadeokar ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Shrikant Namdeo सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing :07.01.2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement :07.01.2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per N.K. Billaiya, Am: These Are Appeals By The Assessee Preferred Against Three Separate Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-26, Mumbai Dated 5.4.2010, 14.9.2012 & 13.8.2013 Pertaining To Assessment Years 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri S.C. TiwariFor Respondent: Shri Shrikant Namdeo
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40A(3)Section 68

…tted that the enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) is without notice and is against the settled proposition of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Rai Bahadur Hardutroy MOtilal Chamaria 66 ITR 443 (SC), Gedore Tools Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT 238 ITR 268 (Del). It is the say of the Ld. Counsel that the enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law and on this count only the appellate order need to be quashed. 9. Per contra, the Ld. Departmental Representative strongly supported the findings of the AO and also relied upon the findings of the Ld. CIT(A). 10. We have given a thoughtful consider…