TO(2004) 1 SOT 90 (Mum); CIT v. Daulatram Rawatmull 53 ITR 574 (SC); Umacharan Shaw & Bros. v. CIT

69 Taxmann.com 309High Court2016#8526 most cited

What is TO(2004) 1 SOT 90 (Mum); CIT v. Daulatram Rawatmull 53 ITR 574 (SC); Umacharan Shaw & Bros. v. CIT authority for?

Additions based on seized documents cannot be sustained if the assessee is not a party to those documents and statements recorded do not implicate the assessee in receiving funds beyond acknowledged amounts. The burden of proof lies with the Revenue to establish the nexus between the assessee and the transactions.

13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Ajay Surendrabhai Patel · 69 Taxmann.com 309 · seized agreement of sale · not party to seized document · statements recorded · addition based on seized documents · nexus with transaction · burden of proof

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing TO(2004) 1 SOT 90 (Mum); CIT v. Daulatram Rawatmull 53 ITR 574 (SC); Umacharan Shaw & Bros. v. CIT

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Cir.-2, Surat vs. Shri Rameshbhai Raghavbhai Bhadani, Surat

In the result, summarized and concise ground No

ITA 45/SRT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./It(Ss)A Nos.25 &31/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Virtual Court Hearing) Deputy Commissioner Of Rameshbhai Raghavbhai Bhadani, Prop. Of M/S Rangeela Fashion, 14, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Room No. 505, 5Th Floor, Nirman Industrial Estate, A.K. Road, Fulpada, Surat Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Vs. Surat-395001. Deputy Commissioner Of Income- Rameshbai Raghavhai Bhadani Plot No.14-16, Nirman Tax, Central Circle-2, Room No.505, 5Th Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Industrial Estate, A./K. Road, Surat-395008 Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adkpb 0556 F (Assessee) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.45/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Shri Rameshbhai Raghavbhai Income-Tax, Circle-3, Room No. Bhadani, Prop. Of M/S Rangeela Vs. 505, 5Th Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Fashion, 14, Nirman Industrial Majura Gate, Surat-395001. Estate, A.K. Road, Fulpada, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adkpb 0556 F (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri H. P. Meena, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A.L. SAINI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./IT(SS)A Nos.25 &31/SRT/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Virtual Court Hearing) Deputy Commissioner of Rameshbhai Raghavbhai Bhadani, Prop. of M/s Rangeela Fashion, 14, Income-tax, Central Circle-2, Room No. 505, 5th Floor, Nirman Industrial Estate, A.K. Road, Fulpada, Surat Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Vs. Surat-395001. Deputy Commissioner of Income- Rameshbai Raghavhai Bhadani Plot No.14-16, Nirman tax, Central Circle-2, Room No.505, 5th Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Industrial Estate…

TO(2004) 1 SOT 90 (Mum); CIT v. Daulatram Rawatmull 53 ITR 574 (SC); Umacharan Shaw & Bros. v. CIT (69 Taxmann.com 309) — Cited in 13 Judgments | BharatTax