Tilda Riceland Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

161 TTJ 213Income Tax Appellate Tribunal#16881 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 350,364 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2023.

Judgments citing Tilda Riceland Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Dow Chemical Inernational Pvt. Ltd. As Successor of Roham and Haas (India) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs. ITO - 14(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the assessee in A

ITA 6577/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am M/S. Rohm & Haas India Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax-11(1)(1) 1St Floor, Block B, Room No.204, Aayakar 02, Godrej Business District Bhavan, M.K. Road, Priojshanagar, Lbs Marg Mumbai – 400 020 Vikhroli (W) Mumbai – 400 079 Pan/Gir No.Aaacr2855F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Sa No.261/Mum/2019 M/S. Dow Chemical Vs. Income Tax Officer – International Pvt. Ltd., As 14(1)(1), Room No. 431, Successor Of Rohm & Haas Aayakar Bhavan, Mk Road, (India) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai – 400 020 Godrej It Park – P2 1St Floor Block B, 02 Lbs Road, Godrej Business District, Pirojshahnagar Vikhroli (W) Mumbai – 400 079 Pan/Gir No.Aaacr2855F (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 92E

…l these decisions were relied upon by the ld. AR to drive home the point that CUP should be accepted as the MAM in the instant case. The ld. AR also placed reliance on the decision of Delhi Tribunal in the case of Tilda Riceland Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT reported in 161 TTJ 213 wherein acceptability of prices from TIPS Data Base was engaged and it was also held that in any event what TIPS software does is to collect the data, compile the same in easy to & SA No.261/Mum/2019 refer format and make it available to the end user of such data online (www.TIPSaxim.com) or on electrical media, but this data nonetheless, is pub…

Rohm and Haas India P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 11(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the assessee in A

ITA 2199/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am M/S. Rohm & Haas India Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax-11(1)(1) 1St Floor, Block B, Room No.204, Aayakar 02, Godrej Business District Bhavan, M.K. Road, Priojshanagar, Lbs Marg Mumbai – 400 020 Vikhroli (W) Mumbai – 400 079 Pan/Gir No.Aaacr2855F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Sa No.261/Mum/2019 M/S. Dow Chemical Vs. Income Tax Officer – International Pvt. Ltd., As 14(1)(1), Room No. 431, Successor Of Rohm & Haas Aayakar Bhavan, Mk Road, (India) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai – 400 020 Godrej It Park – P2 1St Floor Block B, 02 Lbs Road, Godrej Business District, Pirojshahnagar Vikhroli (W) Mumbai – 400 079 Pan/Gir No.Aaacr2855F (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 92E

…l these decisions were relied upon by the ld. AR to drive home the point that CUP should be accepted as the MAM in the instant case. The ld. AR also placed reliance on the decision of Delhi Tribunal in the case of Tilda Riceland Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT reported in 161 TTJ 213 wherein acceptability of prices from TIPS Data Base was engaged and it was also held that in any event what TIPS software does is to collect the data, compile the same in easy to & SA No.261/Mum/2019 refer format and make it available to the end user of such data online (www.TIPSaxim.com) or on electrical media, but this data nonetheless, is pub…

Tilda Riceland Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (161 TTJ 213) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax