Tej International Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT

118 Taxmann 59High Court2001#1752 most cited
64

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 153(1)Section 153(4)Section 158ABSection 144BSection 153Section 144C

Issues it is cited on

section 158absection 261section 144cofsection 22(1)section 11(3)stay of demandsection 153(4)section 144c(4)section 140reference to tposection 158asection 21

Judgments citing Tej International Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT

Kaybee P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 10(1)(3) (Erstwhile Juridictional ITO 8(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 4950/MUM/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2020AY 2006-07
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271ASection 271BSection 92ASection 92A(1)(b)Section 92A(2)Section 92DSection 92E

…ITA No. 4949 and 4950/Mum/15 Assessment year: 2006-07 Page 1 of 17 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Saktijit Dey (Judicial Member)] ITA No 4949 and 4950/Mum/18 Assessment year: 2006-07 Kaybee Pvt Ltd …………….Appellant 301, A Wing, Solaris I, Saki Vihar Road Andheri (East), Mumbai 400 072 [PAN: AAACK1715H] Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 10(1)(3), Mumbai …………….. Respondent Appearances by P J Pardiwalla along-with Madhur Agarwal for the appellant Ujjawal Kumar for the respondent Dates of hearing of the appeal : February 18 and 21, 2020 Date of pronou…

Kaybee P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 10(1)(3) (Erstwhile Juridictional ITO 8(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 4949/MUM/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2020AY 2006-07
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271ASection 271BSection 92ASection 92A(1)(b)Section 92A(2)Section 92DSection 92E

…ITA No. 4949 and 4950/Mum/15 Assessment year: 2006-07 Page 1 of 17 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Saktijit Dey (Judicial Member)] ITA No 4949 and 4950/Mum/18 Assessment year: 2006-07 Kaybee Pvt Ltd …………….Appellant 301, A Wing, Solaris I, Saki Vihar Road Andheri (East), Mumbai 400 072 [PAN: AAACK1715H] Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 10(1)(3), Mumbai …………….. Respondent Appearances by P J Pardiwalla along-with Madhur Agarwal for the appellant Ujjawal Kumar for the respondent Dates of hearing of the appeal : February 18 and 21, 2020 Date of pronou…

Kaybee P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 10(1)(3) (Erstwhile Juridictional ITO 8(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 2165/MUM/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2020AY 2007-08
Section 143(3)Section 92ASection 92A(1)Section 92A(1)(b)Section 92A(2)

…ITA No. 2165/Mum/15 Assessment year: 2007-08 Page 1 of 15 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Saktijit Dey (Judicial Member)] ITA No 2165/Mum/15 Assessment year: 2007-08 Kaybee Pvt Ltd ……………….............Appellant 301, A Wing, Solaris I, Saki Vihar Road Andheri (East), Mumbai 400 072 [PAN: AAACK1715H] Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 10(1)(3), Mumbai ………….……......Respondent Appearances by P J Pardiwalla along-with Madhur Agarwal for the appellant Ujjawal Kumar for the respondent Dates of hearing of the appeal : February 18 and 21, 2020 Date of prono…

Kaybee P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 10(1)(3) (Erstwhile Juridictional ITO 8(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 2164/MUM/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2020AY 2006-07
Section 143(3)Section 92ASection 92A(1)Section 92A(1)(b)Section 92A(2)

…ITA No. 2164/Mum/15 Assessment year: 2006-07 Page 1 of 15 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Saktijit Dey (Judicial Member)] ITA No 2164/Mum/15 Assessment year: 2006-07 Kaybee Pvt Ltd ……………….............Appellant 301, A Wing, Solaris I, Saki Vihar Road Andheri (East), Mumbai 400 072 [PAN: AAACK1715H] Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 10(1)(3), Mumbai ………….……......Respondent Appearances by P J Pardiwalla along-with Madhur Agarwal for the appellant Ujjawal Kumar for the respondent Dates of hearing of the appeal : February 18 and 21, 2020 Date of prono…