Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (preventive) Jam Nager

58 Taxmann.com 126Reported decision2015#7061 most cited

What is Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (preventive) Jam Nager authority for?

There can be no estoppel against the law. If a procedure is mandated by law, it must be followed strictly; otherwise, the action taken has no legal existence.

16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs · estoppel against law · mandatory procedure · no existence in eye of law · paragraph 18

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (preventive) Jam Nager

Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), Hyderabad vs. Dagumati Swathi, Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue being devoid and bereft of any substance is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1638/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 13Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)Section 151A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रवीश सूद, माननीय "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, माननीय लेखा सद"य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1638/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year:2013-14) Income Tax Officer, VS. Dagumati Swathi, Ward-8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN: FBMPS4778H (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) करदाताका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri Phaneedra Nag, CA Assessee Represented by राज"वका""त"न"ध"व/ : Shri A P Babu, Sr. AR Department Represented by सुनवाईसमा…