Tara Devi Goenka v. CIT

198 CTR 201High Court#7303 most cited

What is Tara Devi Goenka v. CIT authority for?

Accumulated jewellery found during a search is not automatically treated as unexplained income if it can be accounted for as 'stree dhan' or acquired on other occasions, especially if the quantity is considered normal for a long married life.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2023.

Also referred to as

Tara Devi Goenka v. CIT · jewellery found during search · unexplained jewellery · stree dhan · normal quantity of jewellery · section 131 · section 271aab · accumulated profits · corpus donation · child · paper company · section 131(1a) · colourable device · section 271aa · source of source

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Tara Devi Goenka v. CIT

Tara Devi Goenka v. CIT (198 CTR 201) — Cited in 15 Judgments | BharatTax