T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO

469 ITR 657High Court2024#1295 most cited

What is T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO authority for?

Section 144B of the Income Tax Act does not completely divest the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) of their power to assess or reassess, even with the introduction of the Faceless Reassessment Scheme.

88

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Also referred to as

T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO · 469 ITR 657 · Section 144B · Section 147 · Section 148 · Faceless Reassessment Scheme · Jurisdictional Assessing Officer · JAO power · income escaping assessment

Also reported as

167 Taxmann.com 759

Sections most often in play

Section 148Section 147Section 144BSection 151ASection 151Section 148ASection 69CSection 10(38)
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 144b(1)section 151asection 135asection 282a(1)doctrine of mergersection 65asection 282aincome escaping assessmentsection 148a(b)section 140asection 148a(d)non-speaking order

Judgments citing T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirunelveli vs. Srinivasagam Selvamathan, Tuticorin

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2654/CHNY/2025[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. SrinivasagamFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…ch Srinivasagam Selvamathan :: 5 :: of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri P. Raveendran ACIT Circle 1 Tirunelveli, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act on…

Sellandi Balasundaram, Namakkal vs. ITO, Ward-1, Namakkal

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2899/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.T.S. Lakshmi VentatramanFor Respondent: Mr. K.Ilaiyaraja, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Shanmugavelu Prabhu Ward 1 Namakkal, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act on 29…

Krishnan Nagarajan, Salem vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Salem

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2893/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.T.S. LakshmiFor Respondent: Mr. K.Ilaiyaraja, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Gurusamy Vasuki Ward 1(1) Salem, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act on 07.04.2…

Komaripalayam Pacs Ltd., Namakkal vs. ITO, Ward-2., Namakkal

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2891/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.T.S. Lakshmi VentatramanFor Respondent: Mr. K.Ilaiyaraja, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Chinniah Palvannan Ward 2 Namakkal, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act on 30.0…

Vargheesh Sathish Kumar, Thiruvattar, Kanyakumari vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Nagercoil, Income Tax Office

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2886/CHNY/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.T. Vasudevan AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. K.Ilaiyaraja, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Dr. B.S. Venu Kumar, Ward 1 Nagercoil, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act on 2…

Sathishkumar Sasikala, Chennai vs. Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 7(3), Chennai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2855/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Ms. K. Vishwa PadmanabanFor Respondent: Mr. K.Ilaiyaraja, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Krishnamurthy Hemalatha Non-Corp Ward 7(3) CHE, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Ac…

Gunasekaran Karpagam, Erode vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Erode

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2849/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.S.Senthil KumarFor Respondent: Mr. K.Ilaiyaraja, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Uppath Sanjayan Nair Ward 2 (4) TPR, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act on 30…

Sidhampoondi Pa Cultural Coop Bank Ltd. S 1392, Namakkal vs. ITO, Ward-2, Namakkal

ITA 3070/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3070/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 Sidhampoondi Pa Cultural Co-Op Bank Ltd S 1392, 2/173, Main Road, Kondarasampalayam Post P. Velur Tk, Namakkal-637203 Tamil Nadu [Pan: Aabas 0168 F] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. Ito, Ward-02, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu-6370001 (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : None प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By : Mr. Arv Srinivasan, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 19.12.2025 आदेश / Order Per Manu Kumar Giri, Jm: The Captioned Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 12.08.2025 For Ay 2019-20. 2. At The Outset, We Notice That The Assessee By The Ground No.2 Challenges The Jao Jurisdiction To Issue Notice U/S148 Dated 30.03.2023 Of The Act.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Mr. ARV Srinivasan, CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'डी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'D' BENCH: CHENNAI श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3070/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 SIDHAMPOONDI PA CULTURAL CO-OP BANK LTD S 1392, 2/173, main Road, Kondarasampalayam Post P. Velur TK, Namakkal-637203 Tamil Nadu [PAN: AABAS 0168 F] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) v. ITO, Ward-02, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu-6370001 (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant by : N…

Cpt Elecy System Employees Coop T&C Society, Kancheepuram vs. ITO, Ward-1, Kancheepuram

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms above

ITA 3058/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 3058/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 V. Cpt Elecy System Employees Ito, Coop T & C Society Che-W-(141) (91) No 30 S M Dass Avenue, Chennai, Iyappa Nagar, Tamil Nadu Kancheepuram-631501 [Pan: Aacac8508J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 144BSection 147Section 148

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ’डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 3058/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 v. CPT ELECY SYSTEM EMPLOYEES ITO, COOP T AND C SOCIETY Che-W-(141) (91) NO 30 S M DASS AVENUE, Chennai, IYAPPA NAGAR, Tamil Nadu KANCHEEPURAM-631501 [PAN: AACAC8508J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Mr. Reddy Prakash, CA अपीलाथ" क ओर से/ Appellant by : ""यथ" क ओर से /Respondent b…

Swamedas Panithasan, Chennai vs. ITO, Non-Corporate Ward 17(2), Chennai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms above

ITA 3056/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3056/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 V. Swamedas Panithasan Ito, No 14/82 New No 20 Anna Salai, Non-Corporate Ward-17(2), Periyar Nagar A, T. Nagar Chennai. Chennai Alwarthiru Nagar, Alwarthirunagar, Chennai-600087 Tamil Nadu [Pan: Axjpp4321R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 144BSection 147Section 148

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ’डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3056/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 v. SWAMEDAS PANITHASAN ITO, NO 14/82 NEW NO 20 ANNA SALAI, Non-Corporate Ward-17(2), PERIYAR NAGAR A, T. NAGAR CHENNAI. CHENNAI ALWARTHIRU NAGAR, ALWARTHIRUNAGAR, CHENNAI-600087 TAMIL NADU [PAN: AXJPP4321R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क ओर से/ Appellant by Mrs. Muthu Ab…

Meenakshisundaram Saravanan, Chennai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1, Tirunelveli

ITA 3034/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
For Respondent: Mr. ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'डी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'D' BENCH: CHENNAI श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3034/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2016-17 MEENAKSHISUNDARAM SARAVANAN 5122, Prestige Bella Vista, Tower 05, 11th Floor, Iyyappanthangal, Chennai-600056, Tamil Nadu [PAN: BAHPS 3185 A] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant by v. ACIT, Circle-1 Tirunelveli-627011, Tamil Nadu (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Mr. V…

Indiran Selvi, Vellore vs. ITO, Ward-3, Vellore

ITA 3024/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Mr. Venkataraman, CAFor Respondent: Mr. ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'डी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'D' BENCH: CHENNAI श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3024/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2015-16 Indiran Selvi v. The ITO, No. 82, Gandhi Road, Palanipet, Che-W-(146)(3), Arakkonam, Vellore District-631002 Chennai [PAN: BLRPS 5957 D] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr. Venkataraman, CA प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent by :…

Kamaraj Priya, Tiruvarur vs. ITO, Ward-1, Tiruvarur

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms above

ITA 2484/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2484/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 V. The Ito, Kamaraj Priya, 2/94, Chinnaian Street, Ward-1, Karuvakurichi, Tiruvarur 614 018. Tiruvarur. [Pan:Dwqpp1186K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gauthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2484/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 v. The ITO, Kamaraj Priya, 2/94, Chinnaian Street, Ward-1, Karuvakurichi, Tiruvarur 614 018. Tiruvarur. [PAN:DWQPP1186K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. Gauthami Manivasagam, JCIT सुनवाईक"…

Ammapalayam Basuvaptti Primary Agricultural Co Op Credit Society Limited, Erode vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1) Erode, Erode

ITA 2704/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Ms.A. Vijayalakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151ASection 271B

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Kumaresan Tirumalai, Ward-2 (1), Erode, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act o…

Ammapalayam Basuvaptti Primary Agricultural Co Op Credit Society Limited, Erode vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1) Erode, Erode

ITA 2703/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Ms.A. Vijayalakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151ASection 271B

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Kumaresan Tirumalai, Ward-2 (1), Erode, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Act o…

Arulmigu Vettudaiyar Kaliamman Thirukovil, Sivagangai vs. ITO, Exemptions Ward, Madurai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2682/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr.T.S.Lakshmi VenkatramanFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee for (i) AY 2015- 16 note that the JAO Shri Muthu Kalidoss, Exemptions Ward, Madurai, had issued notice…

Arulmigu Vettudaiyar Kaliamman Thirukovil, Sivagangai vs. ITO, Exmptions Ward, Madurai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2681/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr.T.S.Lakshmi VenkatramanFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee for (i) AY 2015- 16 note that the JAO Shri Muthu Kalidoss, Exemptions Ward, Madurai, had issued notice…

Niranjan Devikumari, Salem vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Salm

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2678/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr.T.S.Lakshmi VenkatramanFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 6. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Gurusamy Vasuki, Ward 1(1) Salem, had issued notice u/s.148 of the ITA Nos.2678…

Sundarraj Sujatha, Chennai vs. ITO, Ncw-19(4), Chennai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2662/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Ms.Srinithi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Vattikala Chenchalarao Non-Corporate Ward 19(4) Chennai, had issued notice u/s.1…

Mr. Siva Kumar Dhanapal, Tiruvallur vs. ITO, Ward-1, Tiruvallur

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2661/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr.Shrenik Chordia, C.AFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

…as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We on the legal issue raised by the assessee note that the JAO Shri Dravida Mani Gandhimadhi Ward 1 Tiruvallur, had issued notice u/s.148 of the Ac…