S.M.Noorudheen Shajahan, Coimbatore vs. JCIT, Coimbatore
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed
ITA 256/CHNY/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2011-2012
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.256/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2011-12 Shri S.M. Noorudheen Shajahan, The Joint Commissioner Of No. 25A-4/1, Ami Mid Town, Vs. Income Tax, Range Iii, D.B. Road, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore 641 018. Coimbatore 641 002. [Pan:Abcpn6465F] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ashish Tripathi, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 26.07.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Coimbatore, Dated 16.11.2015 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12, Wherein, The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Addition Of ₹.43,90,810/- From Sale Of Lands Treating The Same As Business Income.
For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Tripathi, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 54F
…he assessee in his books of account, showing it as a fixed asset therein and, consequently, returning it as a part of his wealth (of which there is though no evidence) would, therefore, be of little consequence (ref: Sutlej Cotton Mills Limited vs. CIT [1979] 116 ITR 1 (SC)). 6.3 The assessee’s claim for exemption under section 54F of the Act stands, under the circumstances, in our view, rightly denied by the Revenue in-as-much as the gain arising on the sale of the housing sites is assessable as business income under section 28 of the Act. Accordingly, the ground raised by the assessee is dismissed. 7. In the…