Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT

116 ITR 1Supreme Court of India1979#177 most cited

What is Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

A gain arising from the cancellation of a forward exchange contract entered into for the acquisition of a capital asset constitutes a capital receipt. Income-tax liability for such transactions is determined by the specific provisions of the Income Tax Act, independent of the accounting treatment in the books of account.

409

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2007 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd · 116 ITR 1 · capital receipt · foreign exchange gain · forward contract · capital asset · Section 43A · income tax liability · accounting treatment · capital gains

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT

Addl CIT RG 24(1), Mumbai vs. Arun Damji Gada, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in part in terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 105/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm Shri Arun Damji Gada Vs. Acit 24(1) A-103, God Gift Adarsha Pratyshakar Bhawan Dugdhalaya Lane, Bandra Kurla Complex Adarsh Nagar, Adarsh Dhughala Bandra (E) Lane, Malad (W) Mumbai – 400 050 Mumbai – 400 064 Pan/Gir No.Aabpg3923F Appellant) .. Respondent) Acit 24(1) Vs. Shri Arun Damji Gada C-13 R/Nop, 503 A-103, God Gift Adarsha Pratyshakar Bhawan Dugdhalaya Lane, Bandra Kurla Complex Adarsh Nagar, Adarsh Bandra (E) Dhughala Lane, Malad (W) Mumbai – 400 050 Mumbai – 400 064 Pan/Gir No. Aabpg3923F Appellant) .. Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 80I

…ly determinethe timing & incidence of and amount of taxation. To this extent the judgements of the Apex court in cases of Kedamath Jute Mfg Co Ltd vs CIT (1971) 82 ITR 363 (Supreme Court) , Tuticorin Alkalies Chemicals 227 ITR 172 (SC) and Sutlej Cotton Mills 116 ITR 1 (SC) are respected and to be followed without any qualifications to them in spirit and essence both. The appellant has claimed that if his projects are to be taxed on substantial completion then his expenditure of Rs.3.80 crores estimated on the basis of similar activities in other project of the appellant subjected to tax, as furnished to the Asse…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 4202/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year: 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2007-08 Dcit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No. 226/Del/2011 (Arising Ita No.2720/Del/2011) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.E. Dastur, Sr. Advocate and Shri Ankit Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

…of law that the treatment in the books of account is not conclusive or relevant for the purpose of income tax and in support he relied upon the following judgements:- (i) Kedarnath Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd. – 82 ITR 363 (SC) (ii) Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. CIT – 116 ITR 1 (SC) (iii) Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals &b Fertilizers Ltd. 227 ITR 172 (SC). ACIT vs. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. DCIT vs. M/s.Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. & M/s.Delhi International Airport Pvt.Ltd. vs.ACIT 20. Lastly, Mr Dastur submitted that from the perusal of all the materials placed on record as well as relevant terms of…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2720/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year: 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2007-08 Dcit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No. 226/Del/2011 (Arising Ita No.2720/Del/2011) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.E. Dastur, Sr. Advocate and Shri Ankit Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

…of law that the treatment in the books of account is not conclusive or relevant for the purpose of income tax and in support he relied upon the following judgements:- (i) Kedarnath Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd. – 82 ITR 363 (SC) (ii) Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. CIT – 116 ITR 1 (SC) (iii) Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals &b Fertilizers Ltd. 227 ITR 172 (SC). ACIT vs. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. DCIT vs. M/s.Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. & M/s.Delhi International Airport Pvt.Ltd. vs.ACIT 20. Lastly, Mr Dastur submitted that from the perusal of all the materials placed on record as well as relevant terms of…

The Madras Silks India Pvt. Ltd., Tiruppur vs. DCIT, Tiruppur

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 180/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 180/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Madras Silks India Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of No. 68-A, College Road, Vs. Income Tax, Tirupur 641 602. Circle 1, Tirupur. [Pan: Aacct4954H] (Appellant) (Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Swaminathan, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Asish Tripathi, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 30.08.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 3, Coimbatore Dated 27.10.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Addition Of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation Loss On Principal Repayment Of Wind Mill Loan.

For Appellant: Shri S. Swaminathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Asish Tripathi, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 37(1)Section 43A

…f the Act. The Assessing Officer, while completing the assessment, has treated the foreign currency fluctuation loss on account of repayment as cost of the asset by following the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sutlej Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT 116 ITR 1 and in pursuant to the provisions of section 43A of the Act and allowed depreciation thereon, whereas, the gain was assessed as income because it has resulted consequent to demerger. 6.1 The foreign exchange fluctuation loss is in relation to foreign currency loan attributable to acquisition of indigenous machinery. Thus, the substance of the issu…

S.M.Noorudheen Shajahan, Coimbatore vs. JCIT, Coimbatore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 256/CHNY/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.256/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2011-12 Shri S.M. Noorudheen Shajahan, The Joint Commissioner Of No. 25A-4/1, Ami Mid Town, Vs. Income Tax, Range Iii, D.B. Road, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore 641 018. Coimbatore 641 002. [Pan:Abcpn6465F] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ashish Tripathi, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 26.07.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Coimbatore, Dated 16.11.2015 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12, Wherein, The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Addition Of ₹.43,90,810/- From Sale Of Lands Treating The Same As Business Income.

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Tripathi, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 54F

…he assessee in his books of account, showing it as a fixed asset therein and, consequently, returning it as a part of his wealth (of which there is though no evidence) would, therefore, be of little consequence (ref: Sutlej Cotton Mills Limited vs. CIT [1979] 116 ITR 1 (SC)). 6.3 The assessee’s claim for exemption under section 54F of the Act stands, under the circumstances, in our view, rightly denied by the Revenue in-as-much as the gain arising on the sale of the housing sites is assessable as business income under section 28 of the Act. Accordingly, the ground raised by the assessee is dismissed. 7. In the…