Sunil Kapoor v. CIT

235 Taxmann 279High Court2015#4902 most cited

What is Sunil Kapoor v. CIT authority for?

Additions made by invoking Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act are deleted when the facts and circumstances are similar to prior judicial precedents and Board circulars.

24

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2022.

Also referred to as

Sunil Kapoor v CIT · 375 ITR 1 · Section 2(22)(e) · deemed dividend · addition deleted · CIT(A) relied on precedent · Madras High Court · Subba Reddy

Also reported as

375 ITR 1

Judgments citing Sunil Kapoor v. CIT

M.G.Surendranath, Chennai vs. ITO Non Corporate Ward 15(5), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2095/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Ble & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2095/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Mr.M.G.Surendranath, V. The Income Tax Officer, No.1/5, 4Th Cross Street, Non-Corporate Ward-15(5), Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai. Chennai. [Pan: Btlps 1112 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.S.Sridhar, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.03.2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.03.2022

For Respondent: Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.CIT
Section 2(22)(e)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी जी. मंजूनाथा, माननीय लेखा सद" एवं "ी अिनकेश बनज", माननीय "ाियक सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2095/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Mr.M.G.Surendranath, v. The Income Tax Officer, No.1/5, 4th Cross Street, Non-Corporate Ward-15(5), Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai. Chennai. [PAN: BTLPS 1112 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by Mr.S.Sridhar, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Responden…

Sunil Kapoor v. CIT (235 Taxmann 279) — Cited in 24 Judgments | BharatTax