Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. CIT

99 Taxmann.com 152Supreme Court of India2018#863 most cited

What is Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

The Supreme Court, by dismissing the Special Leave Petition, affirmed that a penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act is invalid if the Assessing Officer fails to specify the exact limb (furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealment of income) under which the penalty is initiated. This failure to frame a specific charge vitiates the penalty proceedings.

121

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. CIT · Section 271(1)(c) · Section 274 · penalty notice validity · specifying limb · inaccurate particulars of income · concealment of income · SLP dismissal · failure to frame specific charge · vitiates penalty proceedings

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. CIT