Sumeet Taneja v. CIT

38 Taxmann.com 149High Court2013#16300 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Judgments citing Sumeet Taneja v. CIT

Jayant Avinash Dave, Pune vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle 5, Pune

In the result, the cross appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the CO is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 23/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.23/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016 Jayant Avinash Dave Vs. Dcit, Office No.801-804, 8Th Floor, Circle 5, Pune Amar Business Park, Sadanand Estates, Plot No.1, S.No.105, Baner Road, Pune – 411045 Pan: Aaqpd6875J Appellant Respondent आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.182/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016 Dcit, Vs. Jayant Avinash Dave Circle 5, Pune 46/2/1B, Kaka Halwai Industrial Estate, Pune Satara Road, Pune – 411009 Pan: Aaqpd6875J Appellant Respondent Cross Objection No.11/Pun/2022 (Arising Out Of Ita No.182/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016 Jayant Avinash Dave Vs. Dcit, Office No.801-804, 8Th Floor, Amar Circle 5, Pune Business Park, Sadanand Estates, Plot No.1, S.No.105, Baner Road, Pune – 411045 Pan: Aaqpd6875J Cross Objector Respondent & Co No.11/Pun/2022

Section 144ASection 28

…d also accepting negative covenants is business income alone. The ld. DR supported the view point of the AO of taxing the entire amount as business income u/s 28 by relying on the judgment of Hon‘ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Sumeet Taneja vs. CIT (2013) 261 CTR 494 (P&H). It was contended that the facts of that case were identical to those of the case under consideration inasmuch as the assessee therein transferred his full shareholding along with agreeing to not compete and the Hon‘ble Court held the entire amount chargeable as business income u/s 28(va) and not separately towards transfer of shares charge…

Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 5, Pune vs. Jayant Avinash Dave, Pune

In the result, the cross appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the CO is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 182/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.23/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016 Jayant Avinash Dave Vs. Dcit, Office No.801-804, 8Th Floor, Circle 5, Pune Amar Business Park, Sadanand Estates, Plot No.1, S.No.105, Baner Road, Pune – 411045 Pan: Aaqpd6875J Appellant Respondent आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.182/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016 Dcit, Vs. Jayant Avinash Dave Circle 5, Pune 46/2/1B, Kaka Halwai Industrial Estate, Pune Satara Road, Pune – 411009 Pan: Aaqpd6875J Appellant Respondent Cross Objection No.11/Pun/2022 (Arising Out Of Ita No.182/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-2016 Jayant Avinash Dave Vs. Dcit, Office No.801-804, 8Th Floor, Amar Circle 5, Pune Business Park, Sadanand Estates, Plot No.1, S.No.105, Baner Road, Pune – 411045 Pan: Aaqpd6875J Cross Objector Respondent & Co No.11/Pun/2022

Section 144ASection 28

…d also accepting negative covenants is business income alone. The ld. DR supported the view point of the AO of taxing the entire amount as business income u/s 28 by relying on the judgment of Hon‘ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Sumeet Taneja vs. CIT (2013) 261 CTR 494 (P&H). It was contended that the facts of that case were identical to those of the case under consideration inasmuch as the assessee therein transferred his full shareholding along with agreeing to not compete and the Hon‘ble Court held the entire amount chargeable as business income u/s 28(va) and not separately towards transfer of shares charge…

The ACIT 12(3), Mumbai vs. Shri Lemuir Air Express, Mumbai

In the result, both appeals of the assessee and revenue are dismissed

ITA 3245/MUM/2008[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Oct 2015AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri R.C. Sharmaआमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 3245/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2004-05 बिाम/ Asstt. Commissioner Of M/S Lemuir Air Express, Income Tax – 12(3), Oricon House, 2Nd Floor, Vs. Room No. 121, 12-K, Dubhash Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 023. Mumbai – 400 020. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aaafl2518C (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2430/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2004-05 बिाम/ M/S Lemuir Air Express, Asstt. Commissioner Of Oricon House, 2Nd Floor, Income Tax – 12(3), Vs. 12-K, Dubhash Marg, Room No. 121, Fort, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai 400 023. M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aaafl2518C (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) Assessee By Shri Hiro Rai & Shri Laxmikant Kothari Revenue By : Shri Ajit Kumar Srivastava – Cit Dr सुनवाई की तायीख /Date Of Hearing : 31-07-2015 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 9-10-2015 [

For Respondent: Shri Ajit Kumar Srivastava
Section 143(3)Section 28Section 54E

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “G” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.C. SHARMA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 3245/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2004-05 बिाम/ Asstt. Commissioner of M/s Lemuir Air Express, Income Tax – 12(3), Oricon House, 2nd floor, Vs. Room No. 121, 12-K, Dubhash Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 023. Mumbai – 400 020. स्थामी रेखा सं./ PAN : AAAFL2518C (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2430/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year…

The Lemuir Air Express, Mumbai vs. M/S. DCIT 12(3), Mumbai

In the result, both appeals of the assessee and revenue are dismissed

ITA 2430/MUM/2008[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Oct 2015AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri R.C. Sharmaआमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 3245/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2004-05 बिाम/ Asstt. Commissioner Of M/S Lemuir Air Express, Income Tax – 12(3), Oricon House, 2Nd Floor, Vs. Room No. 121, 12-K, Dubhash Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 023. Mumbai – 400 020. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aaafl2518C (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2430/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2004-05 बिाम/ M/S Lemuir Air Express, Asstt. Commissioner Of Oricon House, 2Nd Floor, Income Tax – 12(3), Vs. 12-K, Dubhash Marg, Room No. 121, Fort, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai 400 023. M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aaafl2518C (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) Assessee By Shri Hiro Rai & Shri Laxmikant Kothari Revenue By : Shri Ajit Kumar Srivastava – Cit Dr सुनवाई की तायीख /Date Of Hearing : 31-07-2015 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 9-10-2015 [

For Respondent: Shri Ajit Kumar Srivastava
Section 143(3)Section 28Section 54E

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “G” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.C. SHARMA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 3245/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2004-05 बिाम/ Asstt. Commissioner of M/s Lemuir Air Express, Income Tax – 12(3), Oricon House, 2nd floor, Vs. Room No. 121, 12-K, Dubhash Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 023. Mumbai – 400 020. स्थामी रेखा सं./ PAN : AAAFL2518C (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2430/Mum/2008 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year…

Sumeet Taneja v. CIT (38 Taxmann.com 149) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax